Connie Millar, Climate Change Symposium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tiered Approaches to Priority Setting From Amy Luers & Susi Moser, 2006 I. “No Regrets” - Actions that provide benefits in current and future climate conditions even if no climate change occurs II. “Low Regrets” - Actions that provide important benefits at relatively little additional cost or risk III.“Win-Win” - Actions that reduce the impacts of climate change while providing other benefits
Triage Approaches to Priority-Setting triare (Fr): to sort Condor: Should it be sorted red or black? TRIAGE Categories: Red Urgent, treatable: immediate priority Yellow Mid urgency; soon to become red Green Stable, low priority Black Urgent, untreatable with available resources: no action ************************* Re-assess & re-sort
Page 1 and 2: Managing for Climate and Climate Im
Page 3 and 4: TOOLBOX APPROACH No single solutio
Page 5 and 6: “Adaptation” in a climate-chang
Page 7 and 8: Resisting the effects of climate ch
Page 9 and 10: 3. Enable Ecosystems to Respond to
Page 11 and 12: * Anticipate and Plan for Associate
Page 13 and 14: * Increase Diversity In the forest
Page 15 and 16: 5. Reduce Greenhouse Gases & Reduce
Page 17: Overall: Setting Priorities Managem
Page 21 and 22: Two Case Studies on National Forest
Page 23 and 24: Web Tools for Forest Managers: The
Page 25 and 26: Complex Climatology Rules in Mounta
Page 27 and 28: Modeled Cold-Air Pooling and Draina
Page 29 and 30: Inyo National Forest: Pilot Study F
Page 31 and 32: A New & Distinct Threat? Sudden Asp
Page 33 and 34: Managing In The Face of Change A To

Connie Millar, Climate Change Symposium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?