Planning Commission - New Albany, Ohio
Planning Commission - New Albany, Ohio Planning Commission - New Albany, Ohio
Mr. Drown stated that the road should not be 50mph due to the increased traffic and condition of the road. When will the residence know what is going on. Mr. Kirby asked what the setbacks are for the property to the north. Mr. Reynolds responded. Mr. Drown asked if curb cuts could be made now on Beech Road. Mr. Rubey stated that the idea is that the existing condition of Beech Road. Improvements would be made prior to any development of this area or the area to the north. Mr. Drown asked why not show us that plan first. What is L-GE zoning? Mr. Rubey stated that it is a limitation text for general employment that staff could provide you with for the details. Mr. Drown asked why they couldn’t have something similar to Smith’s Mill Road where you can’t see the structures. Mr. Rubey responded. Mr. Drown asked we need some recognition to the safety concerns and what we are going through. Mr. Silverstein stated he has the L-GE code allows for general office, personal service, retail, product sales service, vehicle service, off premises signs and conditional activities that include industrial product sales, industrial service, manufacturing, production… Mr. Kirby stated that the applicant has agreed to exclude some of those uses. Mr. Drown stated that zoning allows for everything. Mr. Shockey stated that it is the same as the area north of 161. Mr. Greg asked for some consideration in the process for the current residents. Mr. Hamilton, 1451 Beech Road, stated that when they started annexation you needed to own both sides of the road. This piece that they are rezoning does not own both side of the road. We are now an island. Mr. Kirby confirmed that the question is connectivity for annexation. Mr. Hamilton stated that how were they able to annex when they don’t own both sides of the road. 12 0905 PC Minutes Page 4 of 8
Mr. Banchefsky stated that you do not need to annex both sides of the road. The law states that you need to be contiguous to property within city limits. Mr. Drown stated that they told us that they would not create an island. Mr. Kirby stated that your township. Mr. Drown stated they attended all the meetings when the master plan and 161 exchange were discussed. They told us that they would not create an island. They did not answer all of our questions. They said the water and sewer would be installed but we don’t want water and sewer. Our systems and wells are fine. Mr. King asked who they were. Mr. Drown stated that it was New Albany Company. Ms. Kathy Rose, 1526 Beech Road, stated that it was Ben Hale. I do zoning in Bexley and thinks that NACO has done some great development. I have the same concerns as Craig. Smith’s Mill Road has wonderful buffers, it’s a wonderful drive with the rolling hills. The utilities are not needed. I have a cistern and a well, I don’t need another source for water. Mr. Kirby stated that the service area agreement only allows us to extend services to city residents. Ms. Meyer clarified that the Health Department could require that you hook in the public services if needed. We are not allowed by our agreement to provide services to township residents. Mr. Kirby stated that if your system is not failing or if the county is not attacking failed systems. Mr. Shockey asked where the water & sewer lines will be located. Mr. Rubey stated that they are preliminary to extend water and sanitary sewer from Bob Evans south under 161, east on Dublin Granville, south on Beech Road on the city side of the street. Mr. Shockey asked if the Beech Road improvements would be similar to the north side. Mr. Rubey stated that it would be similar to the north but depends on the development. Mr. Shockey stated that improvements to Beech Road will occur either way. He then stated that the improvements continued to the northern city boundary of Beech Road. Mr. Rubey stated that additional improvements to the north to Jug are being discussed. 12 0905 PC Minutes Page 5 of 8
- Page 1 and 2: Planning Commission Informal Meetin
- Page 3: Mr. Rubey stated that it will not.
- Page 7 and 8: improved the roadway. We tried to r
Mr. Banchefsky stated that you do not need to annex both sides of the road. The law<br />
states that you need to be contiguous to property within city limits.<br />
Mr. Drown stated that they told us that they would not create an island.<br />
Mr. Kirby stated that your township.<br />
Mr. Drown stated they attended all the meetings when the master plan and 161<br />
exchange were discussed. They told us that they would not create an island. They did<br />
not answer all of our questions. They said the water and sewer would be installed but<br />
we don’t want water and sewer. Our systems and wells are fine.<br />
Mr. King asked who they were.<br />
Mr. Drown stated that it was <strong>New</strong> <strong>Albany</strong> Company.<br />
Ms. Kathy Rose, 1526 Beech Road, stated that it was Ben Hale. I do zoning in Bexley<br />
and thinks that NACO has done some great development. I have the same concerns as<br />
Craig. Smith’s Mill Road has wonderful buffers, it’s a wonderful drive with the rolling<br />
hills. The utilities are not needed. I have a cistern and a well, I don’t need another<br />
source for water.<br />
Mr. Kirby stated that the service area agreement only allows us to extend services to city<br />
residents.<br />
Ms. Meyer clarified that the Health Department could require that you hook in the<br />
public services if needed. We are not allowed by our agreement to provide services to<br />
township residents.<br />
Mr. Kirby stated that if your system is not failing or if the county is not attacking failed<br />
systems.<br />
Mr. Shockey asked where the water & sewer lines will be located.<br />
Mr. Rubey stated that they are preliminary to extend water and sanitary sewer from<br />
Bob Evans south under 161, east on Dublin Granville, south on Beech Road on the city<br />
side of the street.<br />
Mr. Shockey asked if the Beech Road improvements would be similar to the north side.<br />
Mr. Rubey stated that it would be similar to the north but depends on the development.<br />
Mr. Shockey stated that improvements to Beech Road will occur either way. He then<br />
stated that the improvements continued to the northern city boundary of Beech Road.<br />
Mr. Rubey stated that additional improvements to the north to Jug are being discussed.<br />
12 0905 PC Minutes Page 5 of 8
Change language