Clifden Poor Law Union archive collection, Descriptive List, GPL3.pdf

Clifden Poor Law Union archive collection, Descriptive List, GPL3.pdf Clifden Poor Law Union archive collection, Descriptive List, GPL3.pdf

galwaycoco.ie
from galwaycoco.ie More from this publisher
20.02.2015 Views

Clifden Poor Law Union deem it necessary under the exceptional circumstances of the case to question the legality of the expenditure…‟ (GPL3/63, p189). In January 1889 the issue of the „…unfortunate state of indebtedness’ of the Union was again discussed, when the Board asked the Local Government Board to ‘…procure for us the power of borrowing a sufficient sum to be repaid with 3½ per cent spread over a number of years. We could then work our Union in a satisfactory manner. We feel that in bringing this matter under the notice of the LGB we are conveying to them the wishes of the Ratepayers of our Union’ (GPL3/66, p449). At the same time the Board again recommended the ‘…construction of a line of railway from Galway to Clifden‟ (GPL3/66, p450). Finally in May 1889 the Board was able to express its appreciation to the Chief Secretary ‘…for the warm interest he takes in the improvement of our long neglected county evinced by his statement that he is about to carry out the recommendations of Sir John Alport’s Royal Commission to have the Railway constructed from Galway to Clifden 9 . We feel that on the carrying out of this measure the prosperity of our country depends, and we trust the Bill will meet with no obstructions…’ (GPL3/67, p208). On 3 December 1890 the Board resolved „We the Board of Guardians of the Clifden Union representing the inhabitants of Connemara at this our first meeting since the Galway Grand Juries gave their sanction to the construction of the Galway and Clifden Railway feel it our duty to tender our grateful thanks to Her Majesty’s Government for the munificent grant of £264,000 for the construction of the line and especially to the Right Honourable Arthur J Balfour, Chief Secretary for Ireland, for his unwearied exertions in having the Railway Bill passed. We also tender our best thanks to the Grand Juries for the cordial manner in which they gave their sanction to the proposed measure. We also feel our best thanks are due to Sir Ralph Cusack, the Chairman of the M.G.W. Railway Company and his co-directors for the manner in which they have co-operated with the Government and the Grand Juries thereby securing to our county the inestimable benefit of internal communication’ (GPL3/69, p282b). It took several years to build the railway, and various delays were encountered with different contractors. The Board, in June 1892, urged the contractors to ‘press on the work’ of railway construction and noted that the „...works appear to be neglected this year as they were last year when they might be most satisfactorily proceeded with’ (GPL3/73, p211). In September 1892 the Board wrote to the Chief Secretary of Ireland regarding the debt incurred by the Union under the ‘Relief of Distress Act of 1896, when ¾ of the whole 9 The Light Railways (Ireland) Act was passed in 1889. Under the Act, the Midland Great Western Railway Company (MGWR) constructed rail links to Achill and Killala in County Mayo and to Clifden in County Galway. The line from Galway to Oughterard was opened on 1 January 1895 and the rest of the line came into operation in July. There were six stations between Clifden and Galway, each about 7 to 8 miles apart, Moycullen, Ross, Oughterard, Maam Cross, Recess, Ballynahinch. The total length of the line was 48 miles, 550ft. Cartlann Chomhairle Contae na Gaillimhe „…cuimhne dhoiciméadach Chontae na Gaillimhe a shealbhú, a chaomhnú agus a dhéanamh inrochtana’ Galway County Council - Archives „…to acquire, preserve and make accessible the documentary memory of county Galway’ xiv.

Clifden Poor Law Union population of the Union were in absolute want. The Grant to the Union under the Act was entirely inadequate to meet the widespread distress existing and the poverty of the Union is so great that it is simply impossible to pay the large balance due...’ (GPL3/73, p492). In December 1893 the minutes record that the work on the railway was ‘virtually suspended,’ and had thus ‘...thrown out of employment the greater number of the people working thereon’ (GPL3/75, p250). However, the railway finally opened in January 1895, and operated until its closure in 1935 10 . Due to the distress in 1890-91 caused by yet another crop failure relief works were again introduced. In 1890 Stephen Joyce, the Relieving Officer (RO) for the Renvyle district, reported that many of the people in the district were in ‘…a most destitute condition and stand in immediate need of relief, many of them have not a potato for the last month and some, having found their crops not worth digging have decided to leave them in the ground. They have been refused credit, a fact I have learned not alone from the statement of the parties themselves, but from inquiry I made in the shops. Though distress is more intense and widespread in Renvyle Division than in any other, equally extensive portions of my District there are other isolated spots where a very unsatisfactory state of things prevails....’ (GPL3/69, p282d). The statement made by the RO was disputed as being „untrue‟ by the Board of Guardians. However, at its meeting of 4 th February 1891 the Board of Guardians (BG) expressed their „…alarm at the large increase in number of persons in receipt of outdoor relief in the Union and the still more increasing demand for it. Last week the number was 725, the amount £31, this week the number was 694 the amount £32…‟. The Board applied to the Government for assistance, advising that they could not afford to provide all the required relief. They advised they would ‘…be obliged in future to refuse to sanction such provisional relief unless the LGB come to the aid of the Guardians. This will involve the breaking up of the homes of many families and becoming paupers in the workhouse and consequently a burthen for ever on the Union. Like the Turbot Island families who abandoned their homes last week and came into the workhouse…’ (GPL3/70, pp32j-k). In April 1891 the Guardians advised the LGB that the Union was „indebted‟ in the sum of £4,500, primarily due to the grants issue for seed, instigated by the Seed Supply Act of 1880, 10 Finance Committee Minute , „Clifden Railway Line: Submitted letter dated 11 April from the Department of Industry & Commerce stating that train service will be discontinued as from the 29th April 1935' (GCCA, GC/3/6, 13 Apr 1935, p150). Also „Galway -Clifden Railway: Co. Cooke proposed & Co. Ashe seconded that the County Surveyor of the Western Division and the County Secretary be requested to accompany a deputation from the Galway Urban Council to the Gt. S. Rly Co. Dublin with a view to prevent the removal of the Railway Bridge over the Corrib and the removal of the line with particular reference to that part of the line between Galway and Menlo' (GCCA, Galway County Council, Financial Committee Minutes, GC/3/6, p195). Cartlann Chomhairle Contae na Gaillimhe „…cuimhne dhoiciméadach Chontae na Gaillimhe a shealbhú, a chaomhnú agus a dhéanamh inrochtana’ Galway County Council - Archives „…to acquire, preserve and make accessible the documentary memory of county Galway’ xv.

<strong>Clifden</strong> <strong>Poor</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Union</strong><br />

population of the <strong>Union</strong> were in absolute want. The Grant to the <strong>Union</strong> under the Act was<br />

entirely inadequate to meet the widespread distress existing and the poverty of the <strong>Union</strong> is so<br />

great that it is simply impossible to pay the large balance due...’ (GPL3/73, p492).<br />

In December 1893 the minutes record that the work on the railway was ‘virtually suspended,’<br />

and had thus ‘...thrown out of employment the greater number of the people working thereon’<br />

(GPL3/75, p250).<br />

However, the railway finally opened in January 1895, and operated until its closure in 1935 10 .<br />

Due to the distress in 1890-91 caused by yet another crop failure relief works were again<br />

introduced. In 1890 Stephen Joyce, the Relieving Officer (RO) for the Renvyle district,<br />

reported that many of the people in the district were in ‘…a most destitute condition and stand<br />

in immediate need of relief, many of them have not a potato for the last month and some,<br />

having found their crops not worth digging have decided to leave them in the ground. They<br />

have been refused credit, a fact I have learned not alone from the statement of the parties<br />

themselves, but from inquiry I made in the shops. Though distress is more intense and<br />

widespread in Renvyle Division than in any other, equally extensive portions of my District<br />

there are other isolated spots where a very unsatisfactory state of things prevails....’<br />

(GPL3/69, p282d). The statement made by the RO was disputed as being „untrue‟ by the<br />

Board of Guardians.<br />

However, at its meeting of 4 th February 1891 the Board of Guardians (BG) expressed their<br />

„…alarm at the large increase in number of persons in receipt of outdoor relief in the <strong>Union</strong><br />

and the still more increasing demand for it. Last week the number was 725, the amount £31,<br />

this week the number was 694 the amount £32…‟. The Board applied to the Government for<br />

assistance, advising that they could not afford to provide all the required relief. They advised<br />

they would ‘…be obliged in future to refuse to sanction such provisional relief unless the LGB<br />

come to the aid of the Guardians. This will involve the breaking up of the homes of many<br />

families and becoming paupers in the workhouse and consequently a burthen for ever on the<br />

<strong>Union</strong>. Like the Turbot Island families who abandoned their homes last week and came into<br />

the workhouse…’ (GPL3/70, pp32j-k).<br />

In April 1891 the Guardians advised the LGB that the <strong>Union</strong> was „indebted‟ in the sum of<br />

£4,500, primarily due to the grants issue for seed, instigated by the Seed Supply Act of 1880,<br />

10<br />

Finance Committee Minute , „<strong>Clifden</strong> Railway Line: Submitted letter dated 11 April from the Department of Industry & Commerce<br />

stating that train service will be discontinued as from the 29th April 1935' (GCCA, GC/3/6, 13 Apr 1935, p150). Also „Galway -<strong>Clifden</strong><br />

Railway: Co. Cooke proposed & Co. Ashe seconded that the County Surveyor of the Western Division and the County Secretary be<br />

requested to accompany a deputation from the Galway Urban Council to the Gt. S. Rly Co. Dublin with a view to prevent the<br />

removal of the Railway Bridge over the Corrib and the removal of the line with particular reference to that part of the line between<br />

Galway and Menlo' (GCCA, Galway County Council, Financial Committee Minutes, GC/3/6, p195).<br />

Cartlann Chomhairle Contae na Gaillimhe „…cuimhne dhoiciméadach Chontae na Gaillimhe a shealbhú, a chaomhnú agus a dhéanamh inrochtana’<br />

Galway County Council - Archives „…to acquire, preserve and make accessible the documentary memory of county Galway’<br />

xv.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!