18.02.2015 Views

Alternative resilient livelihood option for fisher-folks tsunami victims

Alternative resilient livelihood option for fisher-folks tsunami victims

Alternative resilient livelihood option for fisher-folks tsunami victims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2: Growth, survival and production of crabs in the first farming cycle<br />

% of<br />

# of # of % of Avg. wt at Avg. wt at Avg. wt<br />

Cage #<br />

wt.<br />

stocked Harvested Survival stocking(g) Harvesting(g) gained<br />

gain<br />

C 1 10 10 100 540 915 375 69.44<br />

C 2 10 7 70 580 945 365 62.93<br />

C 3 10 8 80 740 1299 559 75.54<br />

C 4 10 10 100 600 1024 424 70.66<br />

C 5 10 9 90 475 825 350 73.68<br />

In this experiment, individual weight gained during fattening was 414.6 gms <strong>for</strong> crabs weighing<br />

587gms. These growth increments were seem to be very high in comparison with other studies done<br />

by Bensam, (1986), who recorded average monthly increments of 80- 162 gms <strong>for</strong> crabs of initially<br />

weighing 50 gms. Feeding was not a problem during the fattening period because all the crab feed<br />

employed such as trash fish, fine pieces of chicken gut wastes, shrimp heads, fish offal and kitchen<br />

leftovers were well accepted. The all Feed Consumption Rate (FCR) values <strong>for</strong> all cages showed<br />

values greater than one (Table 3).<br />

Table 3: Feed consumption and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) <strong>for</strong> the first farming cycle<br />

Cage # Total wt. of feed provided(kg) Total wt. gained(kg) FCR(on wet weight basis)<br />

C 1 16.275 3.570 4.56:1<br />

C 2 14.210 1.925 7.38:1<br />

C 3 15.440 2.352 6.56:1<br />

C 4 16.870 3.150 5.35:1<br />

C 5 14.940 2.412 6.19:1<br />

Maintenance costs of floating crab cages are minimal compared to the fish cages. The crawling of<br />

crabs along the wooden poles or side nettings of the cages helps to reduce fouling. Except <strong>for</strong><br />

attached seaweeds, there is no fouling by barnacles or other organisms. Such organisms probably<br />

serve as an alternative food source <strong>for</strong> the crab.<br />

The net profit of the operation was SL Rs.6388.00 per cage (Table 4). At the same time in our crab<br />

fattening programme the beneficiaries were provided with a wooden crab cage costs, Rs.2650.00<br />

and 10 watery crabs with costs of Rs.3000.00. Through the first farming cycle they obtained<br />

Rs.5650.00 per cage additionally. This amount of money is enough to establish another cage with<br />

watery crabs to continue the next fattening cycle. If one could run about maximum of 10 fattening

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!