Financial sector development - Sida
Financial sector development - Sida
Financial sector development - Sida
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Attitudinal change in favour of the informal <strong>sector</strong><br />
• Enabling regulation based on a notion of ”hands-off”.<br />
• Expanding research on the informal <strong>sector</strong>.<br />
2. Extending formal <strong>sector</strong> services to informal <strong>sector</strong> clients, involving:<br />
• Changing the modes of operation of formal financial institutions to make them relevant<br />
to the clients rather than attempting to change the clients (through graduation).<br />
• Profoundly rethink how to handle transaction costs and risks when dealing with small<br />
clients and subsequent modification of financial products and modes of operation.<br />
• Major efforts on institution building.<br />
3. Linking formal and informal financial institutions, involving:<br />
• Attitudinal change towards the actors on the informal markets.<br />
• Modification of financial products and modes of operation of formal <strong>sector</strong> actors.<br />
• Major efforts on institution building directed at formal institutions.<br />
4. Creation of new institutions for informal finance, involving:<br />
• Focusing on financial service requirements among small farm households.<br />
• Promoting further experimentation, notably with community based credit and savings<br />
associations and village banks with simultaneous efforts to modify operations of<br />
(selected) formal institutions and establishment of linkages.<br />
• Making institution building the centre piece of any effort.<br />
• Expanding the role of credit unions.<br />
• Refraining from initiating and supporting ad hoc efforts, generally limited to provision of<br />
credit.<br />
7.4.2 Provision of microfinance 2<br />
An increasing number of relatively successful informal <strong>sector</strong> and microfinance<br />
institutions have been set up in Asia and Latin America. Basically two models have<br />
emerged which have proved sustainable despite the fact that their clientele belongs to<br />
the poorest clientele. One model could be called the ”BRI-model” based on the<br />
experiences made by Bank Rakyat Indonesia, the other the ”Grameen model” which<br />
incorporates experiences made by Grameen Bank in Bangladesh and its many<br />
successor banks.<br />
The ”BRI model” is based on a formal commercial bank with a large network of branches<br />
which covers the rural areas and which makes the bank being close to its customers. By<br />
recruiting fresh graduates and intensive training and retraining the bank officers have<br />
changed attitudes towards the rural clients seeing them as creditworthy and worth the<br />
attention of the bank in line with that of larger clients. Most of the lending are made<br />
against formal collateral on land and property. A precondition for such a system is that<br />
there is an efficient cadastral and land registration system, which enables the clients to<br />
provide formal collateral and to give the necessary assurances to the bank that the<br />
ownership rights of the property are not possible to challenge. The interest rates charged<br />
by BRI to its microcredit clients are higher than the rates of its larger borrowers, as the<br />
transaction costs are higher. This segmentation of interest rates are possible as the<br />
2 In this report interpreted as financial services provided to individuals, households and enterprises with up to<br />
ten employees.<br />
43