Financial sector development - Sida
Financial sector development - Sida
Financial sector development - Sida
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Source: A. Chhibber, Journal of Africa Economies - May 1995.<br />
The impression gained from this picture, for instance the ranking order of the three<br />
countries, can be reinforced by looking at a number of other variables, such as income<br />
per capita, relative prevalance of poverty etc. Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and other<br />
countries of interest in the Swedish aid context, would show a pattern similar to that of<br />
Ghana in this picture.<br />
The focus here is on the financial aspects of <strong>development</strong> in Africa and East Asia. The<br />
financial systems in most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have a number of<br />
characteristics in common. They are part and parcel of, and to some extent a cause of<br />
the stagnation in the African economies. By contrast, the East Asian economies have on<br />
the whole created financial environments which have been conducive to economic<br />
progress -- although there are substantial differences between the countries.<br />
In Africa, as well as in East Asia, banks and other financial institutions operate in a policy<br />
environment which is largely determined by the countries' governments, including central<br />
banks and regulatory agencies. It may be useful to divide the "policy environment" into<br />
two spheres. One has to do with fiscal and monetary policies, including the modes of<br />
financing government deficits. These policies largely determine the growth and stability of<br />
the economy. The second sphere of the "policy environment" relates more specifically to<br />
the legislative and regulatory rules and frameworks surrounding the operations of<br />
financial institutions and markets.<br />
The most notable differences between the financial systems in African and East Asian<br />
economies concern the first aspect of policies, i.e. those that define the macro-economic<br />
frameworks and, specifically, the degree of stability of the economies. Table 3 below<br />
illustrates some of the relevant differences in the "stability record" between Sub-Saharan<br />
African and East Asia.<br />
Table 3. Some macroeconomic indicators for Africa and East Asia<br />
(1960-1992)<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Budget Inflation Black market Real interest<br />
balance 1 rate 2 exchange rate rates 3<br />
premium<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Africa (SSA) -5.5 26.9 76.6 -67.0<br />
East Asia -1.8 16.4 7.6 +2.0<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
1 Including foreign grants.<br />
2 GDP deflators.<br />
3 Banks’ deposit rates deflated by consumer price indices. Data cover only the period 1986-1993.<br />
Main source: Collins and Bosworth, "Economic Growth in East Asia", in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,<br />
1996:2.<br />
Source for real interest rates: IMF, Sub-Saharan Africa, Growth, Savings and Investment, 1986-93.<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
The effects of the macroeconomic and financial instability in African economies on<br />
financial markets have been compounded by some other features, common to most<br />
37