18.02.2015 Views

Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Campylobacter jejuni ... - SVA

Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Campylobacter jejuni ... - SVA

Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Campylobacter jejuni ... - SVA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Company<br />

LOGO<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN<br />

POULTRY CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI<br />

ISOLATES FROM SLOVENIA<br />

Igor Gruntar, Majda Golob, Jasna Mićunovi<br />

unović, , Irena Zdovc<br />

National Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Institute<br />

Veter<strong>in</strong>ary faculty, , Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology<br />

2012 EURL- <strong>Campylobacter</strong> workshop, , Uppsala


1. 1. Intro<br />

2. 2. Materials and methods<br />

3. 3. Results and comparison to to EU situation<br />

4. 4. Conclusions


Introduction<br />

<strong>Campylobacter</strong> sp.:<br />

the most frequent<br />

bacterial cause of<br />

human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al<br />

<strong>in</strong>fections <strong>in</strong> EU<br />

Intest<strong>in</strong>al campylobacteriosis,<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> causative agens:<br />

<strong>Campylobacter</strong> <strong>jejuni</strong><br />

- normal <strong>in</strong>habitant/commensal of<br />

poultry <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>es<br />

- common / regular poultry meat<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ant<br />

Incidence (EFSA, 2010):<br />

- EU 45,57/100.000<br />

- SLO 46,84/100.000<br />

Aims:<br />

- to analise AMR trends <strong>in</strong> poultry C.<br />

<strong>jejuni</strong> isolates from various matrices <strong>in</strong><br />

2008 – 2011 <strong>in</strong> Slovenia<br />

The problem:<br />

- <strong>in</strong>cidence is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- C. <strong>jejuni</strong> antimicrobial resistance<br />

(AMR) is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- Especially qu<strong>in</strong>olones<br />

- Especially Central and South Europe.


Materials and methods<br />

Isolates<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong><br />

Method<br />

339 339 C. C. <strong>jejuni</strong> <strong>jejuni</strong>isolates<br />

isolates<br />

-<br />

-<br />

broiler<br />

broiler<br />

caecal<br />

caecal<br />

contents<br />

contents<br />

(faeces;<br />

(faeces;<br />

n = 110)<br />

110)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

broiler<br />

broiler<br />

carcasses<br />

carcasses<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

slaughter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

slaughter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(sk<strong>in</strong>;<br />

(sk<strong>in</strong>;<br />

n = 117)<br />

117)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

broiler<br />

broiler<br />

meat,<br />

meat,<br />

before<br />

before<br />

refrigeration<br />

refrigeration<br />

(n<br />

(n<br />

= 112)<br />

112)<br />

--2008: 2008: BS BS Salmonella, Salmonella,<br />

<strong>Campylobacter</strong><br />

<strong>Campylobacter</strong><br />

--2009 2009 – 2011: 2011: national national<br />

<strong>Campylobacter</strong><br />

<strong>Campylobacter</strong><br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g monitor<strong>in</strong>gprogram <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

broilers broilers<br />

--VARS VARS --coord<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

--MIC: MIC: m<strong>in</strong>imal m<strong>in</strong>imal<strong>in</strong>hibitory<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibitory<br />

concentration<br />

concentration<br />

--breakpo<strong>in</strong>ts breakpo<strong>in</strong>tsaccord<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>gto<br />

to<br />

EUCAST EUCAST // AMR-EuRL AMR-EuRLcriteria<br />

--EUCAMP EUCAMP Sensititre Sensititreplates<br />

(TREK (TREK Diagnostics)<br />

Diagnostics)<br />

--ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong>, ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong>, nalidixic nalidixicacid,<br />

acid,<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e, tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e, gentamic<strong>in</strong>, gentamic<strong>in</strong>,<br />

erythromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />

erythromyc<strong>in</strong>,<br />

chloramphenicol chloramphenicoland<br />

and<br />

streptomyc<strong>in</strong><br />

streptomyc<strong>in</strong>


Results<br />

I<br />

2008<br />

EU<br />

2008 2008<br />

2009<br />

SLO<br />

SLO<br />

average<br />

2010<br />

SLO<br />

2011<br />

SLO<br />

% R<br />

% R<br />

% R<br />

% R<br />

% R<br />

CIP 50,0<br />

NAL 51,0<br />

TC 37,0<br />

GM 4,0<br />

ERY 3,0<br />

CHL -<br />

STR -<br />

CIP 72,2<br />

NAL 64,9<br />

TC 32,0<br />

GM 2,1<br />

ERY 0,0<br />

CHL 0,0<br />

STR 4,1<br />

CIP 85,1<br />

NAL 58,1<br />

TC 64,8<br />

GM 0,0<br />

ERY 0,0<br />

CHL 0,0<br />

STR 2,7<br />

CIP 78,0<br />

NAL 46,0<br />

TC 56,0<br />

GM 0,0<br />

ERY 0,0<br />

CHL 0,0<br />

STR 3,0<br />

CIP 91,2<br />

NAL 70,6<br />

TC 51,5<br />

GM 2,9<br />

ERY 2,9<br />

CHL 0,0<br />

STR 2,9


Results II<br />

<strong>Antimicrobial</strong> resistance <strong>in</strong> C. <strong>jejuni</strong> <strong>in</strong> broilers<br />

from Slovenia; 2008-2011<br />

100,0<br />

% R<br />

90,0<br />

80,0<br />

70,0<br />

60,0<br />

50,0<br />

40,0<br />

30,0<br />

20,0<br />

10,0<br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - EU average 2008<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - EU average 2008<br />

nalidixic acid - EU average 2008<br />

gentam ic<strong>in</strong><br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - all sam ples<br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - fecal sam ples<br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - sk<strong>in</strong> and m eat sam ples<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - all sam ples<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - fecal sam ples<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - sk<strong>in</strong> and m eat sam ples<br />

erythrom ic<strong>in</strong><br />

nalidixic acid - all s am ples<br />

nalidixic acid - fecal sam ples<br />

nalidixic acid - sk<strong>in</strong> and m eat sam ples<br />

chloram phenicol<br />

streptom yc<strong>in</strong><br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - hum ans SLO<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - hum ans SLO<br />

nalidixic acid - hum ans SLO<br />

0,0<br />

-10,0<br />

2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Year


Results III<br />

<strong>Antimicrobial</strong> resistance <strong>in</strong> C. <strong>jejuni</strong> <strong>in</strong> broilers<br />

from Slovenia; 2008-2011<br />

100,0<br />

90,0<br />

80,0<br />

% R<br />

70,0<br />

60,0<br />

50,0<br />

40,0<br />

30,0<br />

20,0<br />

10,0<br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - EU average 2008<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - EU average 2008<br />

nalidixic acid - EU average 2008<br />

gentam ic<strong>in</strong><br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - all s am ples<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - all s am ples<br />

erythrom ic<strong>in</strong><br />

nalidixic acid - all s am ples<br />

chloram phenicol<br />

s treptom yc<strong>in</strong><br />

ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong> - hum ans SLO<br />

tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e - hum ans SLO<br />

nalidixic acid - hum ans SLO<br />

0,0<br />

-10,0<br />

2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Year


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010)<br />

2011: 88,7 % !!!<br />

2011: 70,6 % !!! 2011: 44,5 %<br />

2nd place 3rd place 1st place


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010) – C. <strong>jejuni</strong>,<br />

broiler feces, AMR aga<strong>in</strong>st different ABs<br />

SLO 2011: 95 % !!! SLO 2011: 70 % !!! SLO 2011: 65 % !!!


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010) – TC, trends<br />

2011


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010) - CIP<br />

under 20 %<br />

SLO 2011<br />

~ 50 %<br />

under 20 %<br />

more than 80 %


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010) - CIP


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010) – C. coli, TC, pigs


Situation <strong>in</strong> EU (EFSA 2010) – C. <strong>jejuni</strong><br />

SLO 2011: 95 % !!! SLO 2011: 88,7 % !!!


Company<br />

LOGO<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN<br />

POULTRY CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI<br />

ISOLATES FROM SLOVENIA: CONCLUSIONS<br />

• Irrespectively<br />

of the type of sample, from which they were isolated and <strong>in</strong><br />

accordance with the results from other EU countries, the antibiotic tic resistance <strong>in</strong><br />

poultry C. <strong>jejuni</strong> isolates from Slovenia is most commonly found aga<strong>in</strong>st three<br />

antibiotics: ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong>, nalidixic acid and tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

• <strong>Resistance</strong> rate to these antibiotics is substantially above the European<br />

average and with an 2010-2011 2011 upward trend <strong>in</strong> case of both qu<strong>in</strong>olones.<br />

• The worst situation recorded was for 2011 C. <strong>jejuni</strong> faecal stra<strong>in</strong>s, when 95%<br />

resistance rate to ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong>, 70% resistance rate to nalidixic acid and 65%<br />

resistance rate to tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e was recorded<br />

• <strong>Resistance</strong> was very rarely observed aga<strong>in</strong>st erythromyc<strong>in</strong>, gentamic<strong>in</strong>,<br />

chloramphenicol and streptomyc<strong>in</strong>: <strong>in</strong> this area Slovenian isolates ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> good<br />

sensitivity and fall below the European average.


Company<br />

LOGO<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN<br />

POULTRY CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI<br />

ISOLATES FROM SLOVENIA<br />

Do we agree that …<br />

… C. <strong>jejuni</strong> resistance to ciprofloxac<strong>in</strong>, tetracycl<strong>in</strong>e and<br />

nalidixic acid has reached alarm<strong>in</strong>g proportions <strong>in</strong><br />

Slovenia ?<br />

… reasons for such a high percentage of resistant isolates<br />

should be further <strong>in</strong>vestigated, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the possibility of<br />

<strong>in</strong>apropriate use of antibiotics <strong>in</strong> poultry production<br />

… C. <strong>jejuni</strong> AMR studies needed <strong>in</strong> EFSA non-report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries ?<br />

… C. <strong>jejuni</strong> might be used as a sent<strong>in</strong>el/<strong>in</strong>dicator<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator bacterium<br />

to detect the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g AMR on a farm/region<br />

region/country<br />

?


Time … is runn<strong>in</strong>g out …

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!