18.02.2015 Views

目錄 - 研究發展處 - 稻江科技暨管理學院

目錄 - 研究發展處 - 稻江科技暨管理學院

目錄 - 研究發展處 - 稻江科技暨管理學院

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

稻 江 學 報 第 五 卷 第 一 期<br />

Table 1. (continued) ANOVA Comparisons of Overall Satisfaction According to Education Level<br />

Descriptive Statistics<br />

ANOVA<br />

Education Level N Mean SD Sources Sum of Squares df Mean square F p<br />

Senior High 16 3.5 .9 Between Groups .473 2 .237 .484 .619<br />

Vocational school 36 3.4 .7 Within Groups 36.221 74 .489<br />

College 25 3.5 .6 Total 36.695 76<br />

Conclusion<br />

In refer to the results, the information indicated the most elder learners can take advantage the Web-based<br />

courses, and received good satisfaction for the learning activities involved Web 2.0 technology. As a positive<br />

outgrowth of technology, designers have many different opportunities to use Web 2.0 technology for their<br />

instructional activities. Web 2.0 makes possible development of an e-learning activities plan that includes three<br />

important educational factors for learning efficiency: interaction, participation, and collaboration for older adults’<br />

learning. E-learning systems have become more and more popular and many adaptive learning environments have<br />

been proposed to offer elder learners customized courses which consider their aptitudes and learning outcomes<br />

(Tseng, et al., 2007).<br />

Moreover, Web 2.0 enables older adults who are willing to contribute their time and thinking to the<br />

development of knowledge, together, in the learning communities. An instructor can utilize different kinds of<br />

teaching tools that are related to Web 2.0 in order to motivate elder students’ learning interests. A successful<br />

educational result rarely occurs for reluctant students; using Web 2.0 technology may overcome this resistance and<br />

can make teaching more fun and learning more interesting.<br />

Reference<br />

Coombs, K. A. (2007). Building a Library Web Site on the Pillars of Web 2.0.<br />

Computers in Libraries, 27(1), 16-19<br />

Dekeyser, S., & Watson, R. (2006). Extending Google Docs to Collaborate on<br />

Research Papers. The University of Southern Queens-land, Australia, Retrieved<br />

March 06, 2009, from http://www.citeulike.org/user/snyder84/author/Dekeyser<br />

Diehl, W. C. (2007). The new social networking technologies: educators get<br />

a Second Life. Paper presented at the Twelfth Cambridge Conference on Open and<br />

Distance Learning, London, UK.<br />

Duffy, P. D., & Bruns, A. (2006). The Use of Blogs, Wikis and RSS in Education: A<br />

Conversation of Possibilities. Paper presented at the In Proceedings Online<br />

Learning and Teaching Conference 2006, pages pp. 31-38, Brisbane.<br />

Duffy, P., (2007). Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for<br />

Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. In: D. Remenyi, ed. 6th European<br />

Conference on e-Learning, 4-5 October 2007 Copenhagen. Reading, Academic<br />

Conferences Limited, 173-182.<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!