17.02.2015 Views

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

English - Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>English</strong> “Multi-national” is commonly used<br />

<strong>in</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess sec<strong>to</strong>r, for example a mult<strong>in</strong>ational<br />

company is one that operates<br />

throughout the world. There is a provision<br />

<strong>in</strong> the constitution <strong>to</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>ate the vice<br />

president from a different nationality than<br />

the President. Thus <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Nepal</strong>i context<br />

“national” refers <strong>to</strong> ethnicity. Literally Dalit<br />

means daliyeko <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong>i. In India, cobblers<br />

have been named Harijan and they write it<br />

as their last name. The word Dalit has been<br />

established as an identity with<strong>in</strong> the Dalit<br />

community and it has been also accepted<br />

politically and socially. However, their<br />

issues relate <strong>to</strong> social justice rather than<br />

identification.<br />

Q. How is the right <strong>to</strong><br />

self determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

ensured for <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

populations? -Pan<br />

Bahadur Gharti<br />

A. Regard<strong>in</strong>g the right<br />

<strong>to</strong> self determ<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

the <strong>in</strong>digenous NGO<br />

Federation and other<br />

<strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

people<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> different political parties have<br />

different op<strong>in</strong>ions. Therefore it is necessary<br />

<strong>to</strong> ensure that the constitution represents<br />

our sentiment.<br />

Q. In the context of <strong>Nepal</strong>, what type of<br />

right <strong>to</strong> self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation would be<br />

appropriate? -Tika Gauchan<br />

A. There are two thoughts about the right<br />

<strong>to</strong> self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation. Len<strong>in</strong> recognized that<br />

the right <strong>to</strong> self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation is the right<br />

<strong>to</strong> secede and compares it with the right <strong>to</strong><br />

divorce. Though there is the right <strong>to</strong> divorce,<br />

it is not used by all. The United Nations<br />

declaration and ILO 169 regard the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

and collective right <strong>to</strong> self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

as the fundamental right of <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

people and also ensures that <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

people will be <strong>in</strong>formed <strong>in</strong> advance of any<br />

activities be<strong>in</strong>g carried out which will affect<br />

them. However, <strong>in</strong> the context of Madhesh,<br />

the right <strong>to</strong> self determ<strong>in</strong>ation is l<strong>in</strong>ked with<br />

Madhesh Prov<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the old mechanism<br />

did not address the issue of<br />

disadvantage, this change<br />

<strong>in</strong> (Federal) structure has <strong>to</strong><br />

be accepted.<br />

- Yam Bahadur Gurung<br />

Ethiopia has guaranteed the right <strong>to</strong> selfdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

as the right <strong>to</strong> secede, but<br />

with the provision <strong>to</strong> conduct a referendum<br />

three years after a bill of secession is brought<br />

<strong>in</strong> the parliament. This is <strong>to</strong> provide sufficient<br />

time for the people <strong>to</strong> have second thoughts<br />

about secession.<br />

Other questions related<br />

with m<strong>in</strong>orities and their<br />

rights are <strong>in</strong>cluded later <strong>in</strong><br />

this report.<br />

Presentation on Fiscal<br />

Federalism:<br />

Prof Krishna Hachhethu<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed that the proposed federal f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

system has a provision of centralized<br />

revenue collection. The draft constitution has<br />

projected 88% revenue (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fore<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aid) concentrated <strong>in</strong> the center and and only<br />

12% <strong>to</strong> the 14 proposed prov<strong>in</strong>ces. This is<br />

similar <strong>to</strong> the practice of the Australian federal<br />

system. However, follow<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of<br />

equalization, the center has the responsibility<br />

<strong>to</strong> support the less developed prov<strong>in</strong>ces by<br />

collect<strong>in</strong>g revenue from more developed<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces and redistribut<strong>in</strong>g it. He stressed<br />

that <strong>in</strong> the federal system, one prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

can be more developed than another but<br />

18 Federalism Dialogues Series 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!