Updates on the Edition4 Angular Distribution Models - ceres
Updates on the Edition4 Angular Distribution Models - ceres
Updates on the Edition4 Angular Distribution Models - ceres
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Outline<br />
• Ed4 <strong>Angular</strong> Distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>Models</strong><br />
• Cloud property differences between Ed2 and Ed4<br />
• Flux differences due to changes in cloud properties<br />
and ADMs<br />
• Separate Terra/Aqua ADM or combined Terra+Aqua<br />
ADM<br />
• Validati<strong>on</strong>: shortwave direct integrati<strong>on</strong><br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
1
Normalize predicted and observed radiance<br />
R(θ 0 , θ, φ) = πÎ(θ 0, θ, φ)<br />
ˆF (θ 0 )<br />
F (θ 0 )= πI o(θ 0 , θ, φ)<br />
R(θ 0 , θ, φ)<br />
F (θ 0 )= I o(θ 0 , θ, φ)<br />
Î(θ 0 , θ, φ)<br />
ˆF (θ 0 )<br />
1°<br />
Observed radiance:<br />
I o j ,<br />
Predicted radiance:<br />
Î j ,<br />
j =1, ···,n<br />
j =1, ···,n<br />
1°<br />
I o = 1 n<br />
RMS =<br />
n<br />
j=1<br />
I o j<br />
1 n<br />
n<br />
j=1<br />
Îj<br />
Î<br />
Î = 1 n<br />
n<br />
j=1<br />
Î j<br />
− Io j<br />
I o 2<br />
• RMS error between normalized predicted radiance and normalized<br />
observed radiance is used to assess <strong>the</strong> ADM error<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
2
SW angular distributi<strong>on</strong> model over clear land: Modified RossLi<br />
• Collect clear-sky reflectance over 1°✕1° regi<strong>on</strong>s for every<br />
calendar m<strong>on</strong>th;<br />
• Stratify reflectance within each 1°✕1° regi<strong>on</strong> by NDVI (0.1) and<br />
cosθ 0 (0.2);<br />
• Apply modified RossLi fit to produce BRDF and ADM for each<br />
NDVI and cosθ 0 intervals within each 1°✕1° regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
ρ(µ 0 ,µ,φ) =k 0 + k 1 · B 1 (µ 0 ,µ,φ)+k 2 · B 2 (µ 0 ,µ,φ)<br />
from Maignan et al., 2004<br />
Evergreen broadleaf forest<br />
Woody Savannas<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
3
Ed4 clear land ADM reduces <strong>the</strong> RMS error<br />
• Apply Ed4 ADM to Ed4 SSF<br />
RMS = 1 n Îj<br />
n<br />
j=1 Î<br />
− Io j<br />
I o 2<br />
%<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
4
Ed4 clear land ADM reduces <strong>the</strong> RMS error<br />
• Apply Ed2 ADM to Ed3 SSF<br />
%<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM 5
RMS error as a functi<strong>on</strong> of AOD<br />
%<br />
%<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
6
Ed4ADM over clear ocean accounts for aerosol loading and type<br />
• AOD retrieval based<br />
up<strong>on</strong> a fine-mode aerosol<br />
look-up table (urban) and<br />
a coarse-mode aerosol<br />
look up table (maritime);<br />
Ilut j (τ c k)<br />
Ij<br />
obs<br />
SZA=30-32<br />
C1 C2<br />
C3<br />
I lut<br />
f1 f2 f3<br />
j (τ f k )<br />
coarse<br />
fine<br />
• Stratify fine-mode<br />
aerosols into 3 AOD bins<br />
c =<br />
and coarse-mode<br />
aerosols into 3 AOD bins;<br />
6<br />
j=1<br />
I<br />
obs<br />
j − Ij lut (τk c ) <br />
Ij obs +0.01<br />
2<br />
f =<br />
6<br />
j=1<br />
I<br />
obs<br />
j − Ij lut (τ f k<br />
) <br />
Ij obs +0.01<br />
2<br />
• Build ADM for each AOD<br />
bin and type separately<br />
(6 ADMs).<br />
c < f<br />
Y<br />
n<br />
τ = τ c k <br />
τ = τ f k <br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
7
Ed4ADM reduces <strong>the</strong> RMS error over clear ocean<br />
Clear ocean with AOD retrieval 2002 Ed4SSF/Ed4ADM: Ed4SSF/UpEd2ADM: RMS RMS =4.3% =6.4%<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM 8
RMS error increases for <strong>the</strong> largest coarse mode AOD bin<br />
coarse-mode-like<br />
fine-mode-like<br />
ΔRMS=-0.9%<br />
ΔRMS=-0.5%<br />
0-33%<br />
ΔRMS=-0.3%<br />
ΔRMS=-0.3%<br />
33-66%<br />
ΔRMS=0.2%<br />
ΔRMS=-0.4%<br />
66-100%<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
(Terra 2002 cross-track) 9
Is <strong>the</strong> largest coarse mode AOD bin c<strong>on</strong>taminated by clouds?<br />
• Use cloud mask clear_Str<strong>on</strong>g percentage to eliminate<br />
footprints that are possibly c<strong>on</strong>taminated by clouds<br />
% of samples with Clr_str<strong>on</strong>g < 1%<br />
%<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
10
Develop clear-ocean ADM excluding questi<strong>on</strong>able clear FOVs<br />
• Ed4ADMc: including all clear FOVs;<br />
• Ed4ADM1: excluding clear FOVs with clear_str<strong>on</strong>g < 1%;<br />
• Ed4ADM50: excluding clear FOVs with clear_str<strong>on</strong>g < 50%;<br />
• Ed4ADM99: excluding clear FOVs with clear_str<strong>on</strong>g < 99%;<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
11
<strong>Angular</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> model over cloudy ocean<br />
• For glint angle > 20°, or glint angle < 20° and ln(f)> 6:<br />
– Average instantaneous radiances into 775 intervals of ln(f) for<br />
each angular bin (2°) separately for liquid, mixed, and ice clouds;<br />
– Apply a five-parameter sigmoidal fit to mean radiance and ln(f);<br />
I = I 0 +<br />
a<br />
[1 + e −(x−x 0)/b<br />
] c<br />
• For glint angle < 20° and ln(f) < 6:<br />
– Calculate mean radiance for 6 wind speed bins and 4 ln(f) bins;<br />
– Use mean radiance to build ADM<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
12
Ed4SSF produces tighter sigmoidal fit over ocean: liquid<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
13
Ed4SSF produces tighter sigmoidal fit over ocean: ice<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
14
Ed4 ADM decreases <strong>the</strong> RMS error over cloudy ocean:<br />
Terra FM1<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
15
Ed4 ADM decreases <strong>the</strong> RMS error over cloudy ocean:<br />
Auua FM4<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
16
<strong>Angular</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> model over cloudy land/desert<br />
• Derive cloudy area c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> from observed radiance:<br />
fI cld (µ 0 ,µ,φ) =I(µ 0 ,µ,φ) − (1 − f) µ 0E 0<br />
π<br />
ρclr (µ 0 ,µ,φ)−<br />
f µ 0E 0<br />
π<br />
<br />
ρ clr (µ 0 ,µ,φ)e −τ<br />
µ 0 e −τ<br />
µ + α<br />
clr tcld (τ,µ 0 )t cld (τ,µ)<br />
1 − α clr α cld (τ)<br />
• Average instantaneous fI cld into 380 intervals of ln(f)<br />
for each angular bin (5°) for three cloud phases;<br />
• Apply a five-parameter sigmoidal fit to mean fI cld and<br />
ln(f);<br />
I = I 0 +<br />
a<br />
[1 + e −(x−x 0)/b<br />
] c<br />
• Ed4 ADM reduces <strong>the</strong> RMS error over cloudy land.<br />
<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
17
Sea ice index to quantify <strong>the</strong> brightness of sea ice surface<br />
η =1− ρ 0.47 − ρ 0.86<br />
ρ 0.47 + ρ 0.86<br />
High sea ice index<br />
Snow<br />
Bare ice<br />
~0.8-1.0<br />
Wet snow<br />
Melting first year ice<br />
Young melting p<strong>on</strong>d<br />
Melting p<strong>on</strong>ds<br />
~0.1-0.5<br />
Open water<br />
Rosel et al 2012, surface values<br />
Low sea ice index<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
18
Sea ice index decreases as ice starts melting<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
19
• Clear-sky<br />
Shortwave Ed4ADMs over sea ice<br />
– 6 sea ice fracti<strong>on</strong> bins<br />
– 3 sea ice index bins for scenes with sea ice fracti<strong>on</strong> >99%<br />
• Partly cloudy<br />
– 4 cloud fracti<strong>on</strong> bins<br />
– 2 ln(τ) bins<br />
– 6 sea ice fracti<strong>on</strong> bins<br />
– 3 sea ice index bins for scenes with sea ice fracti<strong>on</strong> >99%<br />
• Overcast<br />
– Linear fit between mean reflectance and ln(τ), separately for<br />
liquid and ice clouds and 5 sea ice index ranges derived from<br />
m<strong>on</strong>thly maps<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
20
RMS error for sea ice<br />
July 2003 all-sky<br />
Jan 2003 all-sky<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM 21
Clear-sky l<strong>on</strong>gwave/window angular distributi<strong>on</strong> models<br />
• Over clear land/ocean/snow/ice:<br />
– Ed4 ADMs increased <strong>the</strong> surface skin temperature (Ts) bins and<br />
interpolati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> Ts bins;<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
22
Cloudy-sky LW/WN angular distributi<strong>on</strong> models<br />
• Ed2 ADM uses third-order polynomial fits between<br />
radiance and pseudoradiance () to determine anisotropic<br />
factor;<br />
• Ed4 ADM uses mean radiance for each 1 Wm -2 sr -1 bin,<br />
and interpolates between <strong>the</strong> bins. Third-order<br />
polynomial fits are used as backup;<br />
• Will evaluate if more bins are needed.<br />
Ψ(w, T s ,T c ,f, s , c )=<br />
2<br />
<br />
<br />
(1 − f) s B(T s )+ s B(T s )(1 − cj )+ cj B(T cj )<br />
j=1<br />
f j<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
23
LW RMS error comparis<strong>on</strong> between Ed2ADM and Ed4ADM:<br />
Jan 2001 daytime Terra<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
24
LW RMS error comparis<strong>on</strong> between Ed2ADM and Ed4ADM:<br />
Jan 2001 nighttime Terra<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
25
Daytime Cloud property difference between Ed3 and Ed4<br />
% %<br />
f<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
26
SW flux change between Ed3 and Ed4<br />
Ed4ADM: clear land, cloudy ocean, cloudy land, and sea ice<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
27
Daytime LW flux change between Ed3 and Ed4<br />
Ed4ADM: clear ocean/land/desert, cloudy ocean/land/desert<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
28
Nighttime Cloud property difference between Ed3 and Ed4<br />
% %<br />
f<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
29
Nighttime LW flux change between Ed3 and Ed4<br />
Ed4ADM: clear ocean/land/desert, cloudy ocean/land/desert<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM 30
Terra ADM vs. combined Terra+Aqua ADM<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
31
Aqua ADM vs. combined Terra+Aqua ADM<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
32
Direct integrati<strong>on</strong> for SW flux<br />
I o<br />
• Use observed ( ) and ADM-predicted ( ) radiances to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>struct two sets of regi<strong>on</strong>al (10 ° X 10 ° ) all-sky ADMs<br />
for each seas<strong>on</strong><br />
F (θ 0 )= πI o(θ 0 , θ, φ)<br />
R(θ 0 , θ, φ)<br />
R(θ 0 , θ, φ) = πÎ(θ 0, θ, φ)<br />
ˆF (θ 0 )<br />
• Both sets of regi<strong>on</strong>al all-sky ADMs have <strong>the</strong> same<br />
sampling<br />
Î<br />
• Compare fluxes derived from <strong>the</strong>se two sets of ADMs<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
33
Direct integrati<strong>on</strong> flux error for 2002 Terra FM1<br />
(flux from predicted radiance ADM – flux from observed radiance ADM)<br />
Wm -2<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
34
Z<strong>on</strong>al mean flux error for 2002 Terra FM1<br />
Jan.<br />
Apr.<br />
July<br />
Oct.<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
35
Summary<br />
• We have worked through most scene types and have seen some<br />
improvement in <strong>the</strong> new Ed4 ADMs<br />
• Ed4 cloud algorithm produces higher cloud fracti<strong>on</strong> and more liquid<br />
clouds than Ed2 cloud algorithm<br />
• Initial assessment indicates m<strong>on</strong>thly global mean instantaneous SW<br />
flux will increase (~1.0 Wm-2) due to changes in cloud properties and<br />
ADMs. Changes in LW flux are small (~0.1 Wm-2)<br />
• Combined Terra/Aqua ADMs (clear land, cloudy land, cloudy ocean)<br />
increase <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>thly global mean fluxes from Terra (up to 0.3<br />
Wm -2 ), but decrease <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>thly global mean fluxes from Aqua (up<br />
to 0.8 Wm -2 ).<br />
• Direct integrati<strong>on</strong> of SW indicates that z<strong>on</strong>al mean flux error is less<br />
than 0.5 Wm-2 over most n<strong>on</strong>e-polar regi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
5/7/13 CERES STM <br />
36