16.02.2015 Views

Implications of change management in public administration

Implications of change management in public administration

Implications of change management in public administration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Statistics – Economic Informatics<br />

rate, low level <strong>of</strong> development and high unemployment. Yet, let us consider the Fifth<br />

EU Enlargement. Here eight Central and Easter European countries (Czech Re<strong>public</strong>,<br />

Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia) and the<br />

Mediterranean islands <strong>of</strong> Malta and Cyprus jo<strong>in</strong>t the EU <strong>in</strong> 2004. This was the largest<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle enlargement <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> people, landmass and number <strong>of</strong> countries, and not <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> GDP. Romania and Bulgaria jo<strong>in</strong>ed the EU <strong>in</strong> 2009, as part <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

enlargement. Many <strong>of</strong> current the member states were concerned that these are less<br />

developed countries and as a result <strong>of</strong> this placed number <strong>of</strong> travel and work rights<br />

restrictions.<br />

The conclusion is that European Union has expanded with the countries that are<br />

less developed than the current member states and probably don‟t fulfill all the required<br />

Maastricht criteria for Economic and Monetary Union. This was the reason why this<br />

analysis was encouraged. Fact is certa<strong>in</strong> countries <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the analysis are not yet<br />

prepared for the EU accession, accord<strong>in</strong>g the economic criteria. Yet, EU <strong>in</strong>tegration is<br />

possible process, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the past enlargements.<br />

In order to def<strong>in</strong>e the work<strong>in</strong>g hypotheses, analysis <strong>of</strong> the economic structure<br />

previously expla<strong>in</strong>ed was taken <strong>in</strong>to account. The hypotheses are:<br />

H<br />

1<br />

: Very low developed countries Albania, Bosnia and Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a and<br />

Macedonia should not be classified as EU members <strong>in</strong> the discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis.<br />

H<br />

2<br />

: Low developed countries Serbia and Montenegro could be classified as<br />

EU members <strong>in</strong> the discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis.<br />

H<br />

3<br />

: Relatively developed countries Iceland, Croatia and Turkey are most<br />

likely to be classified as EU members.<br />

H<br />

4<br />

: Countries that are not part <strong>of</strong> the EU due to political and not economical<br />

reasons are most likely to be classified as EU members.<br />

The validity <strong>of</strong> the formulated hypothesis will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the procedure <strong>of</strong><br />

the discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis.<br />

4. Data and methodology<br />

Discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis is useful for build<strong>in</strong>g a model for separation <strong>of</strong> group<br />

membership based on observed characteristics <strong>of</strong> each country. This analysis is used to<br />

model the value <strong>of</strong> a dependent categorical variable EU membership based on its<br />

relationship to seven predictors as important variables for EU <strong>in</strong>tegration. The<br />

procedure generates a discrim<strong>in</strong>ant function based on l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

predictor variables that provide the best discrim<strong>in</strong>ation between two groups <strong>of</strong><br />

countries: EU members and non EU members. Analysis shows which countries should<br />

be part <strong>of</strong> their group and which are misclassified on the basis <strong>of</strong> the considered<br />

variables.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to perform discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

countries which are members <strong>of</strong> the European Union and countries which are not<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the European Union us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependent and cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

variables: foreign direct <strong>in</strong>vestments, gross domestic product, <strong>change</strong> <strong>in</strong> the gross<br />

domestic product (<strong>in</strong> percentage), <strong>in</strong>flation, users <strong>of</strong> the mobile telephony, population<br />

and country’s surface area. Except for the last two variables, it is considered that all<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g variables are <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> one country‟s growth and development, which is<br />

important prerequisite for European Union membership. The discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!