16.02.2015 Views

Implications of change management in public administration

Implications of change management in public administration

Implications of change management in public administration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Revista T<strong>in</strong>erilor Economişti (The Young Economists Journal)<br />

requirements and assumptions <strong>of</strong> the discrim<strong>in</strong>ant analysis are be<strong>in</strong>g met. On the other<br />

side, the paper <strong>in</strong>terprets the results <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the considered problem, or which <strong>of</strong> the<br />

countries mostly resemble to the EU countries. The fourth part has the f<strong>in</strong>al conclusions<br />

and recommendations.<br />

2. EU enlargement for south – eastern european countries<br />

2.1 Economic structure<br />

In 2010 there are 9 countries - applicants for EU accession accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

latest data <strong>of</strong> the European Commission. Only 3 countries have the status “candidate<br />

country”, while the other 6 countries are still “potential candidates”. All countries,<br />

except for Turkey, Albania and Iceland, are countries from the former Yugoslavia<br />

(Table no. 1).<br />

Table no. 1 Applications for EU accession<br />

Country<br />

Status<br />

Croatia<br />

Macedonia<br />

Turkey<br />

Albania<br />

Bosnia and Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Kosovo<br />

Iceland<br />

Montenegro<br />

Candidate country<br />

Candidate country<br />

Candidate country<br />

Potential candidate<br />

Potential candidate<br />

Potential candidate<br />

Potential candidate<br />

Potential candidate<br />

Serbia<br />

Potential candidate<br />

The 8 accession countries (without Kosovo) could br<strong>in</strong>g additional 94 millions<br />

<strong>of</strong> consumers to the European Union market.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> development represented by the GDP per capita (Table no. 2)<br />

proves that the accession countries are at a far lower level <strong>of</strong> development than the<br />

average GDP per capita for the Euro Area which <strong>in</strong> 2007 was 12.228 US dollars,<br />

especially countries like Albania, Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a, Montenegro<br />

and Serbia. On the other side Iceland, Croatia and Turkey have high level <strong>of</strong><br />

development, if <strong>in</strong>dicated by the GDP per capita. Thus, there are three dist<strong>in</strong>ct groups <strong>of</strong><br />

candidates for the European Union:<br />

1. The first group represents very low developed countries with GDP per<br />

capita lower than 4.000 US dollars: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a<br />

and Macedonia.<br />

2. The second group represents low developed countries: Serbia and<br />

Montenegro.<br />

3. The third group represents relatively developed countries: Iceland,<br />

Croatia and Turkey.<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!