Implications of change management in public administration
Implications of change management in public administration
Implications of change management in public administration
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
or, <strong>in</strong> the equivalent form<br />
Economic Theories – International Economic Relations<br />
2 2 2 2 2<br />
2<br />
2 2 2<br />
(1 ) p1<br />
( p2<br />
p3<br />
) x p1<br />
p1<br />
( p2<br />
p3<br />
) x<br />
H <br />
<br />
<br />
.<br />
2 2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2 2<br />
2<br />
2(1 ) 2(1 ) 1<br />
(1 ) 1<br />
<br />
In the case x 0 we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
2<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g Lagrange multipliers we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
2<br />
1 L F<br />
2 (1 )<br />
2 u =<br />
1<br />
2<br />
. .<br />
1<br />
L 1<br />
y<br />
2<br />
z<br />
L<br />
and from Legendre transformation it results<br />
2<br />
1 p1<br />
H<br />
1<br />
<br />
2 (1 )<br />
For x 0 from (8‟) we have<br />
1 p1<br />
H <br />
2<br />
2 1<br />
<br />
this leads us to the next equality<br />
Next, if we denote<br />
<br />
2<br />
p1<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
<br />
H x 0<br />
H 1<br />
.<br />
p<br />
( p<br />
2<br />
2 2<br />
1<br />
2 3<br />
<br />
2 2<br />
2<br />
( 1<br />
) 1<br />
<br />
2<br />
.<br />
. .<br />
with the constra<strong>in</strong>ts y 0 , z 0<br />
2<br />
1 p1<br />
,<br />
2<br />
2 (1 )<br />
p<br />
then the Hamilton‟s equations (5) lead to the follow<strong>in</strong>g differential equations<br />
2<br />
2<br />
dx H<br />
(1 ) p1<br />
p1<br />
1<br />
<br />
, (9)<br />
2 2<br />
2<br />
2 3<br />
dt p<br />
(1 ) 1<br />
(1 ) <br />
dp<br />
dt<br />
1<br />
1 <br />
dy<br />
dt<br />
dz<br />
dt<br />
H<br />
<br />
x<br />
H<br />
<br />
p<br />
H<br />
<br />
p<br />
2<br />
p2x<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
p1<br />
p<br />
<br />
(1 <br />
2<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
p3x<br />
<br />
2<br />
1<br />
<br />
x<br />
2<br />
)<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2 2<br />
3 )<br />
2<br />
p1<br />
p x<br />
<br />
(1 <br />
2<br />
) x<br />
2 2<br />
2 2<br />
( p2<br />
p3<br />
) x p1<br />
( p2<br />
p3<br />
) x<br />
<br />
2<br />
2 2<br />
1<br />
(1 )<br />
dp2<br />
H<br />
<br />
dt y<br />
dp3<br />
H<br />
<br />
dt z<br />
0 p2<br />
0 p3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
, (10)<br />
<br />
1<br />
, (11)<br />
<br />
a const.<br />
b const.<br />
1<br />
, (12)<br />
<br />
2<br />
2 2<br />
p1<br />
( a b ) x<br />
In these conditions the relation <br />
2 2<br />
2<br />
( 1<br />
) 1<br />
<br />
<strong>change</strong> <strong>of</strong> variables:<br />
2<br />
leads to the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
111