15.02.2015 Views

Introduction to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

Introduction to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

Introduction to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fer, or in a breastfeeding infant (68). According <strong>to</strong> measurements conducted by the<br />

United Nations Environmental Programme and the World Health Organization<br />

from 2001- 2013, high DDT levels in human breast milk were found in Ethiopia<br />

(2013), Tajikistan (2009), Solomon Islands (2011), India (2009), Haiti (2005), Pacific<br />

States (2011), Hong Kong SAR (2002), Mauritius (2009), Mali (2009), Moldova<br />

(2009), Togo (2010), Uganda (2009), Fiji (2002), Sudan (2006), Philippines<br />

(2002), Ukraine (2001), Djibouti (2011), Côte d’Ivoire (2010), and others (listed<br />

from highest level first) (Figure 2). However, breast feeding has very important<br />

health benefits <strong>to</strong> children, including decreased risk of infections, Sudden Infant<br />

Death Syndrome, and childhood obesity (69). The World Health Organization recommends<br />

women breast-feed their children for at least the first two years of life.<br />

Elderly people also tend <strong>to</strong> have higher levels of DDTs because the DDTs accumulate<br />

throughout life and because exposures in the past tended <strong>to</strong> be much greater<br />

than in the present in many countries. Indeed, age is often the most powerful predic<strong>to</strong>r<br />

of levels of DDTs (70). For instance, in a community living near an old DDT<br />

manufacturing plant, average adults had 159 ng DDT/ml serum, while the average<br />

DDT level in people over 70 years old was 350 ng/ml (66). This raises the possibility<br />

that elderly persons, who also have a higher chronic disease burden, may have<br />

a greater sensitivity <strong>to</strong> their DDT burden than younger adults, and this should be<br />

kept in mind when working with populations exposed <strong>to</strong> DDTs.<br />

The persistence of DDTs from prior use, coupled with global migration patterns of<br />

humans, both contribute <strong>to</strong> high levels of DDTs in people even in countries with<br />

long-time bans. It takes between four and 10 years for concentrations of DDTs in<br />

people <strong>to</strong> decrease by half (the so-called “half-life” (71)). Hence, while moni<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

studies have established that banning DDT succeeds in lowering human exposure,<br />

levels of DDTs can remain high in people years later (67). For instance, more than<br />

30 years after DDT was banned in the United States and near the time of the<br />

phase-out and ban of DDT in Mexico, agricultural workers who migrated from<br />

Mexico had much higher levels of DDTs than typically seen in the US. Further,<br />

people living in a US community 10 km from a manufacturing plant site that used<br />

<strong>to</strong> produce DDT also had substantially higher levels of DDTs in their bodies than<br />

the general population (66). Thus even countries that do not use DDT should<br />

recognize the possibility of higher exposures <strong>to</strong> DDTs within their population, such<br />

as in migrants and in people living in communities that are near sites of previous<br />

DDT production.<br />

There is elevated exposure <strong>to</strong> DDTs in circumpolar countries because these chemicals<br />

are semi-volatile and undergo long-range transport, meaning they rise in<strong>to</strong><br />

the air in temperate regions and deposit at the earth’s surface in colder regions.<br />

<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> EDCs (December 2014) 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!