14.02.2015 Views

Ancient Near Eastern Art: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v ...

Ancient Near Eastern Art: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v ...

Ancient Near Eastern Art: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Beginning in the early Neolithic period,<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> human figures in<br />

terracotta, stone, or bone were made all<br />

over the <strong>Near</strong> East. We cannot <strong>of</strong>ten tell<br />

whether the figures represent deities or<br />

humans, or if indeed such distinctions<br />

were intended. But by the late fourth and<br />

early third millennia B.C., background scenery<br />

or physical attributes and activities<br />

were included that can sometimes help<br />

us to distinguish gods from men. It is<br />

difficult, however, to tell an ordinary<br />

citizen-a priest or a worshiper, for<br />

example-from a ruler.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the third millennium<br />

B.C. various <strong>Near</strong> <strong>Eastern</strong> states were<br />

engaged in organized trade and imperial<br />

conquest, and then, politically and economically<br />

secure, their rulers began to<br />

have themselves portrayed unambiguously<br />

and sometimes with inscriptions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were depicted performing secular,<br />

military, and religious functions, and the<br />

forms employed were statuary in the<br />

round or carvings on cylinder seals and<br />

reliefs, usually in stone.<br />

<strong>The</strong> figures reproduced here are clearly<br />

rulers, identified as such either by inscriptions<br />

or their regal characteristics. Possibly<br />

the earliest is the heavy, almost<br />

solid-cast head (fig. 1), masterfully and<br />

subtly executed to indicate calm dignity<br />

and inherent power. <strong>The</strong> heavy-lidded<br />

eyes, the prominent but not overlarge<br />

nose, the full-lipped mouth, and the intricately<br />

coiffed beard are all so carefully<br />

and skillfully modeled that the head may<br />

well be a portrait, almost certainly <strong>of</strong> a<br />

ruler. If this is a portrait, then the head is<br />

unique among <strong>Near</strong> <strong>Eastern</strong> artifacts.<br />

Some scholars date it to the second<br />

millennium B.C., others to the late third<br />

millennium B.C., which, considering the<br />

style, seems more likely. <strong>The</strong> maker and<br />

the date <strong>of</strong> the piece remain unknown, as<br />

does the identity <strong>of</strong> this king, whose<br />

representation, mute and nameless, nevertheless<br />

remains one <strong>of</strong> the great works<br />

<strong>of</strong> ancient art.<br />

<strong>The</strong> seated stone figure (fig. 2) represents<br />

Gudea (2144-2124 B.C.), the ensi,<br />

or governor, <strong>of</strong> the ancient Sumerian<br />

state <strong>of</strong> Lagash, whose name and title<br />

are included in the long inscription. A<br />

number <strong>of</strong> stone statues <strong>of</strong> Gudea, seated<br />

or standing, were excavated at Tello<br />

(ancient Girsu), in southern Mesopotamia,<br />

while others, presumably from Tello, surfaced<br />

on the art market; many from both<br />

sources are fragmented, lacking heads<br />

or bodies. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Museum</strong>'s Gudea is complete<br />

and depicts the ruler characteristically<br />

dressed in a brimmed hat decorated<br />

with hairlike spirals and a long garment<br />

2<br />

that leaves one shoulder bare. His hands<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!