Winship Cancer Institute

Winship Cancer Institute Winship Cancer Institute

syntapharma.com
from syntapharma.com More from this publisher

HSP 90 Inhibitors in Lung <strong>Cancer</strong>:<br />

Shock and Awe<br />

Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD<br />

Associate Professor<br />

Director, Division of Medical Oncology<br />

Emory University<br />

<strong>Winship</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>


Will the Heat be Shocked


Hsp90: Background<br />

• Heat shock proteins<br />

represent 1‐2% of all<br />

cellular proteins<br />

• Facilitate protein‐folding<br />

and stabilization<br />

• Induced under stress,<br />

hypoxia and oxidative<br />

damage<br />

Soti et al, J Biol Chem, 2002.


Hsp90 Client Proteins Influence All Aspects of<br />

Neoplastic Transformation<br />

• > 200 Hsp90 client proteins<br />

have been described<br />

• Many oncoproteins are relevant in<br />

NSCLC<br />

Banerji U. Clin <strong>Cancer</strong> Res, 2009


Targeting Hsp90: Rationale<br />

• <strong>Cancer</strong> cells depend on Hsp90 machinery to<br />

preserve mutated and overexpressed<br />

oncoproteins<br />

– ‘Facilitates’ oncogene addiction<br />

• Hsp90 is overexpressed in cancer cells<br />

Trepel et al, Nature Reviews, 2010; Kamal et al, Nature, 2003.


Hsp90 Inhibitors are Selective to<br />

Tumor Cells<br />

‣ 17‐AAG has 100‐fold higher affinity for tumor‐derived Hsp90 than in normal cells<br />

‣ Tumor cells contain Hsp90 complexes in activated, high‐affinity conformation<br />

Kamal et al, Nature, 2003.


Hsp90 Inhibitors‐ The History<br />

1962 1970<br />

2000 2005<br />

2010<br />

Heat shock<br />

proteins<br />

discovered<br />

Geldanamycin<br />

purified for use as<br />

antibiotic<br />

1 st ‐generation<br />

• 17‐AAG, 17‐DMAG<br />

• Formulation issues, toxicity<br />

• Lack of robust efficacy<br />

2 nd ‐generation<br />

• Structurally unrelated to 17‐AAG<br />

• Higher potency, improved safety<br />

7<br />

7


HSP 90 Inhibitors in Clinical Development<br />

Agent Sponsor Administration<br />

17AAG (Tanespimycin) NCI/Kosan iv<br />

17DMAG Kosan iv & oral<br />

IPI-504 (Retaspimycin) Infinity iv<br />

STA-9090 (Ganetespib) Synta iv<br />

AUY-922 Novartis iv<br />

DS-2248 Daiichi Oral<br />

XL-888 Exelixis Oral<br />

IPI-493 Infinity Oral<br />

MPC-3100 Myrexis Oral<br />

SNX-5422 Serenex Oral<br />

CNF-2024 Biogen Idec Oral<br />

Source: Clinicaltrials.gov, accessed 3/29/2011.


Hsp90 Inhibition in NSCLC


Lower gene expression of HSP90 correlates with<br />

improved Survival in NSCLC<br />

Gallegos Ruiz et al, PLoS One. 2008 Mar 5;3(3):e0001722.


STA‐9090 in NSCLC: Salient Findings<br />

• Phase II study in advanced NSCLC<br />

• Patients had progressed following 2‐3 prior regimens<br />

• STA‐9090 was tolerated well and there were no undue<br />

safety concerns<br />

• Objective responses seen exclusively in ALK+ positive<br />

patients (all 4 responders were ALK+)<br />

• Disease stabilization noted in EGFR and KRAS mutated<br />

patients<br />

Wong, Shapiro et al, ASCO 2011, Abs # 7500


Significance<br />

• Among the earliest signs of success with Hsp90<br />

inhibition in lung cancer<br />

• Clear signal in a molecularly selected subset of<br />

adenocarcinoma patients<br />

• Improved safety profile over first‐generation<br />

Hsp90 inhibitors


IPI‐504 in Advanced NSCLC<br />

• Eligibility:<br />

– Histologically confirmed NSCLC, stage IIIb (with effusion) or IV.<br />

– Failed prior EGFR TKI therapy.<br />

• No limit to the number of prior therapies.<br />

• Dose and schedule:<br />

– Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each 21 day cycle; 225 mg/m 2 iv<br />

Mutant EGFR Cohort<br />

Enroll 10 patients<br />

Wild‐Type EGFR Cohort<br />

Enroll 10 patients<br />

If >1 CR, PR, or SD for at<br />

least 3 months<br />

If >1 CR, PR, or SD for at<br />

least 3 months<br />

Expand to a total of<br />

29 patients<br />

Expand to a total of<br />

29 patients<br />

Sequist et al, J Clin Oncol, 28:4953‐4960, 2010


Salient Results<br />

Number of patients<br />

Median age<br />

76 patients<br />

64 yrs<br />

Never-smokers 45%<br />

No. of prior regimens<br />

4<br />

(median)<br />

Objective responses 5 (7%)<br />

mPFS<br />

2.9 m<br />

• Two out of 3 patients with ALK positive NSCLC had major responses<br />

• Activity noted in patients with mutated EGFR and wild‐type KRAS


Role of Hsp90 Inhibition in ALK+ NSCLC


17‐AAG can Overcome Crizotinib Resistance<br />

Katayama R et al. PNAS 2011;108:7535-7540


17‐DMAG is Effective Against EML4‐ALK–driven NSCLC in Genetically Engineered<br />

Mouse Model.<br />

Though responses were seen, it was not durable with 17‐DMAG<br />

Chen Z et al. <strong>Cancer</strong> Res 2010;70:9827-9836


Association of EML4‐ALK proteins with the HSP complex.<br />

• EML4‐ALK associated proteins in complex<br />

– Hsp90<br />

– Hsp70<br />

– HSC70<br />

– BIP/Grp78<br />

– Cdc23<br />

– cdc37<br />

Chen Z et al. <strong>Cancer</strong> Res 2010;70:9827-9836<br />

©2010 by American Association for <strong>Cancer</strong> Research


IPI‐504 Inhibits ALK Signaling<br />

Normant et al, Oncogene, Jan 2011, Epub ahead of print.


Clinical Results: HSP90 Inhibition in ALK + NSCLC<br />

30<br />

Response(% change from baseline)<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

-40<br />

-50<br />

-60<br />

Patients<br />

IPI‐504<br />

STA‐9090<br />

*simulated waterfall plot<br />

based on reported results<br />

N=11<br />

*Durability of responses not reported


Hsp90 Inhibtion in ALK + NSCLC<br />

• There is now clear evidence of robust anticancer<br />

effects with Hsp90 inhibitors in ALK +<br />

NSCLC<br />

– Durability of responses is not established yet<br />

(mPFS)<br />

• Next steps<br />

– Combination of Crizotinib with Hsp90 inhibitors<br />

– Hsp90 inhibition in Crizotinib‐resistant ALK +NSCLC


APotential Follow‐up Study<br />

ALK + NSCLC<br />

Resistance to<br />

Crizotinib<br />

Crizotinib<br />

+<br />

Hsp90 Inhibition<br />

Hsp90 Inhibition


Hsp90 Inhibition in NSCLC<br />

• It is likely that other genetic backgrounds<br />

beyond ALK + disease are susceptible to Hsp90<br />

inhibition<br />

• The effects in KRAS mutated tumors provides<br />

the rationale for combining Hsp90 inhibitors<br />

with other novel agents<br />

• Patients with HER‐2 and RAF mutated tumors<br />

are also potential candidates


Other Strategies for Using Hsp90<br />

Inhibitors in NSCLC


Rationale for Combining Hsp90 inhibitors<br />

and Taxanes<br />

• Hsp90 inhibitors are<br />

synergistic with taxanes<br />

– 17-AAG sensitizes tumor<br />

cells to taxane-induced<br />

apoptosis by inhibition Akt<br />

activation<br />

– STA-9090 and docetaxel<br />

have synergistic effects<br />

• Phase I study of 17-AAG<br />

and paclitaxel<br />

– Tolerated well<br />

– No objective response<br />

Solit et al, <strong>Cancer</strong> Res, 2003; Sawai et al, <strong>Cancer</strong> Res, 2008; Proia et al, AACR 2010;<br />

Ramalingam et al, Clin <strong>Cancer</strong> Res, 2008.;


Emory Univ. Docetaxel + STA-9090<br />

Combination Phase I Study<br />

• Phase I study in patients with advanced solid organ<br />

malignancies (ongoing)<br />

– Docetaxel – day 1<br />

– Ganetespib- days 1 & 15<br />

• N=20 patients to date<br />

• Recommended phase II dose: Docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 ;<br />

Ganetespib 150 mg/m 2<br />

• DLTs- myelosuppression and diarrhea (with 200 mg/m 2 )<br />

• Promising anti-cancer activity<br />

PI: Drs. Harvey and Ramalingam


Phase Ib Study of Docetaxel + IPI-504 in Advanced<br />

NSCLC<br />

• Partial Response<br />

seen in 6 patients<br />

(ORR = 26%)<br />

• Stable Disease<br />

seen in 7 patients<br />

Riely et al, Abstract # 7516, ASCO 2011.


Hsp90 Inhibition: Some Gaps in<br />

Current Knowledge<br />

• Optimal biomarker to assess target modulation<br />

– Changes in Hsp70 do not have a consistent<br />

correlation with anti‐cancer or target effects<br />

• Use of imaging methods to detect target<br />

modulation<br />

– Recent study of HER2 PET in breast cancer<br />

• Targeting the C‐terminal of Hsp90


Conclusions<br />

• Hsp90 inhibitors have entered the therapeutic<br />

algorithm for ALK + NSCLC<br />

• Newer Hsp90 inhibitors have an improved<br />

safety profile and lend themselves for<br />

combination approaches<br />

• In the historically disappointing development of<br />

Hsp90 inhibitors, we have reached an<br />

important and exciting turning point


We are Beginning to Connect the Dots!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!