2D NMR Experiments gCOSY (gradient COrrelation SpectroscopY ...

2D NMR Experiments gCOSY (gradient COrrelation SpectroscopY ... 2D NMR Experiments gCOSY (gradient COrrelation SpectroscopY ...

chem.ucsb.edu
from chem.ucsb.edu More from this publisher
10.02.2015 Views

2D NMR Experiments gCOSY (gradient COrrelation SpectroscopY): a two‐dimensional NMR technique where the cross‐peaks appear between protons that have 3‐ bond proton‐proton scalar coupling, 3 J HH ROESY (Rotating‐frame Overhauser Effect SpectroscopY): a twodimensional NMR technique where the cross‐peaks appear between protons that are within 6 Å of each other, the closer in space the two protons are to each other the more intense the cross‐peak NOESY (Nuclear Overhauser Effect SpectropY): a two‐dimensional NMR technique where the cross‐peaks appear between protons that are within 6 Å of each other, the closer in space the two protons are to each other the more intense the cross‐peak gHSQC (gradient Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence): a two gHSQC (gradient Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence): a twodimensional NMR technique where one axis is 1 H and the other is 13 C. This experiment does not have a diagonal and peaks appear for one‐bond H,Ccorrelation.

<strong>2D</strong> <strong>NMR</strong> <strong>Experiments</strong><br />

<strong>gCOSY</strong> (<strong>gradient</strong> <strong>COrrelation</strong> <strong>SpectroscopY</strong>): a two‐dimensional <strong>NMR</strong><br />

technique where the cross‐peaks appear between protons that have 3‐<br />

bond proton‐proton scalar coupling, 3 J HH<br />

ROESY (Rotating‐frame Overhauser Effect <strong>SpectroscopY</strong>): a twodimensional<br />

<strong>NMR</strong> technique where the cross‐peaks appear between<br />

protons that are within 6 Å of each other, the closer in space the two<br />

protons are to each other the more intense the cross‐peak<br />

NOESY (Nuclear Overhauser Effect SpectropY): a two‐dimensional <strong>NMR</strong><br />

technique where the cross‐peaks appear between protons that are within 6<br />

Å of each other, the closer in space the two protons are to each other the<br />

more intense the cross‐peak<br />

gHSQC (<strong>gradient</strong> Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence): a two<br />

gHSQC (<strong>gradient</strong> Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence): a twodimensional<br />

<strong>NMR</strong> technique where one axis is 1 H and the other is 13 C. This<br />

experiment does not have a diagonal and peaks appear for one‐bond H,Ccorrelation.


Optimizing your setup<br />

Step 1 Tune the <strong>NMR</strong> to your sample gives you the best sensitivity/resolution for <strong>2D</strong><br />

use mtune to adjust to get best dip<br />

Step 2 Lock and shim gives you best resolution/lineshape<br />

If you want to ensure that the instrument is in a good state when you begin do 3<br />

things, load in fresh parameters for your experiment and load in fresh shims then type su.<br />

Step 3 Determine the 1 H and 13 C pw 90 for your sample give best sensitivity with least<br />

amount of artifacts for <strong>2D</strong> experiments<br />

a. 1 H pw 90<br />

not that important for <strong>gCOSY</strong><br />

b. only need to do 1 H pw for ROESY and NOESY but you need to determine the<br />

1 90<br />

H pw 90<br />

and the 13 C pw 90<br />

for gHSQC<br />

How to determine pw 90<br />

for your sample<br />

array the parameter pw and look for the 360⁰ null and then divide that<br />

number by 4<br />

Procedure:<br />

load in 1D 1 H proton experiment<br />

tune and shim your sample<br />

type d1=10<br />

type pw90 to get default pw 90<br />

value<br />

array parameter pw to 4*pw 90<br />

±10 (type (yp array follow instructions)<br />

repeat array command with 0.2 µsec step size around best 4*pw 90<br />

value determined above


Determining the optimum mix time for your sample<br />

Run a 1D <strong>NMR</strong> of your sample<br />

Load the selective 1D experiment that you plan to do a <strong>2D</strong> version of later<br />

Select an area of the spectrum to excite by putting cursors around it and clicking first<br />

select then proceed<br />

Array the mix time for 0.2 to 1<br />

Find the NOE/ROE peak that has the highest intensity and use it’s mixing time in your <strong>2D</strong><br />

experiment<br />

What am I observing<br />

Lets say you select an aromatic peak in your 1D 1 H spectrum to selectively<br />

excite then you run the Noesy1d. The spectrometer will acquire a 1D 1 H spectrum and<br />

only excite the peak you selected, any other peaks that appear in the spectrum are NOE<br />

peaks whose intensity depends on the mixing time.


Setting up the <strong>2D</strong> experiment<br />

1) In setting up a <strong>2D</strong> experiment you either add a proton experiment or one will be added<br />

for you before your <strong>2D</strong> experiment.<br />

In the proton experiment either set the spectral width to the desired range or<br />

turn off minsw<br />

Type pw90=your empirically determined pw 90<br />

for your sample<br />

then type pw=pw90<br />

2) For all <strong>NMR</strong> experiments the number of scans is a function of concentration, ti less<br />

concentrated means you need to do more scans<br />

Signal‐to‐noise is proportional to (number of scans) 2<br />

‐so if you half the concentration you need to do four times the number<br />

of scans<br />

*In general it is better to increase the number of scans over the number of<br />

increments


Experiment specifics<br />

<strong>gCOSY</strong><br />

What to change<br />

two parameters<br />

1. number of scans that you do per increment improves signal‐to‐noise<br />

2. number of increments improves resolution<br />

both of these will increase experimental time<br />

generally 1 scan and 128 increments will give you acceptable spectra<br />

NOESY<br />

What to change<br />

three parameters<br />

1. number of scans that you do per increment improves signal‐to‐noise<br />

noise<br />

2. number of increments improves resolution<br />

3. mixing time this is a parameter that affects the intensity of the crosspeak you<br />

observe, too short of the time and the crosspeak intensity will not have time to develop, too<br />

long of a time and the signal will relax back to equilibrium i and you’ll lose the crosspeak<br />

‐either determine mix experimentally or use 800 milliseconds<br />

8 scans and 128 increments is acceptable


ROESY<br />

What to change<br />

three parameters<br />

1. number of scans that you do per increment improves signal‐to‐noise<br />

noise<br />

2. number of increments improves resolution<br />

3. mixing time this is a parameter that affects the intensity of the crosspeak you<br />

observe, too short of the time and the crosspeak intensity will not have time to develop, too<br />

long of a time and the signal will relax back to equilibrium and you’ll lose the crosspeak<br />

‐either determine mix experimentally or use 800 milliseconds<br />

8 scans and 128 increments is acceptable<br />

gHSQC<br />

What to change<br />

five parameters<br />

1. number of scans that you do per increment improves signal‐to‐noise<br />

2. number of increments improves resolution<br />

3. how you want to handle multiplicity (yes or no)<br />

4. spectral range of the 13 C axis<br />

5. 1 J CH<br />

one‐bond carbon‐proton coupling constant, default is 140 Hz<br />

2 scans and 128 increments is acceptable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!