10.02.2015 Views

CORDIO Status Report 1999.pdf

CORDIO Status Report 1999.pdf

CORDIO Status Report 1999.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

grow, but damage and loss of transplanted corals due to<br />

wave action is common (Birkeland, 1979; Bowden-<br />

Kerby, 1996; Clark, 1995; Harriott, 1988). Some of the<br />

methods applied so far to fix corals on the seabed<br />

involve the use of underwater epoxy glue (Kaly, 1995;<br />

Yap, 1992), terracotta tiles (Plucer-Rosario, 1977;<br />

Birkeland, 1979), steel bars hammered into the substrate<br />

(Guzmán, 1991) or large concrete structures placed on<br />

the seabed (Clark, 1995). These methods are labourintensive<br />

and require SCUBA diving and expensive<br />

materials and equipment, and therefore their application<br />

may be restricted to the reefs with the highest<br />

economic value, such as sites for dive tourism and<br />

recreation. However, most of the countries that are most<br />

seriously affected by coral reef degradation have limited<br />

resources for natural conservation, and it is clear that<br />

large-scale coral reef restoration can never be a realistic<br />

option in developing countries unless simpler methods<br />

are developed, methods that can be applied by the local<br />

community of reef-users without specialist skills and<br />

without great investments in materials.<br />

The need for more cost-effective methods for reef<br />

rehabilitation has led to the suggestion that corals<br />

should be transplanted to low-energy environments<br />

without being attached (Woodley, 1989; Yap, 1990;<br />

Kojis, 1981). Studies on transplantation of unattached<br />

corals performed so far (Birkeland, 1979; Bouchon,<br />

1981; Bowden-Kerby, 1996; Lindahl, 1998; Harriott,<br />

1988; Plucer-Rosario, 1977) have yielded variable results,<br />

possibly due to the different species, methods and<br />

habitats that have been used.<br />

Staghorn corals and other branching corals in the<br />

genus Acropora generally show good survival and rapid<br />

growth after transplantation, and the most promising<br />

results stem from studies of unattached staghorn corals<br />

placed in shallow habitats protected from strong wave<br />

action (Bowden-Kerby, 1996). However, this growth<br />

form has often been dislodged and killed by strong<br />

wave action after transplantation (Bowden-Kerby, 1996;<br />

Harriott, 1988). Likewise, Clark and Edwards (1995)<br />

found higher mortality of branching acroporids transplanted<br />

to a high-energy environment compared to<br />

species with massive growth forms. The branching<br />

growth form and small area of attachment of staghorn<br />

corals makes them vulnerable to strong water movement<br />

even if the corals are firmly attached to a stable<br />

substrate, whereas in a protected or moderately exposed<br />

environment this growth form has the ability to survive<br />

and attain stability even on loose substrate (Gilmore,<br />

1976; Bowden-Kerby, 1996; Tunnicliffe, 1981).<br />

In a recent two-year study, aimed at developing<br />

simple and cost-effective methods for reef rehabilitation,<br />

transplanted staghorn corals showed good survival and<br />

growth on unconsolidated substrate in a moderately<br />

exposed environment (Lindahl, 1998). The method of<br />

tying the corals together on strings before placing them<br />

on the seabed was shown to significantly increase their<br />

ability to colonize the target area.<br />

Staghorn corals are common in shallow waters on<br />

many reefs worldwide; they grow rapidly and have a<br />

natural ability to reproduce through fragmentation and<br />

to colonise unstable substrate. Connell (1985) noted that<br />

small patches and clearings within existing coral<br />

populations are invaded quicker by branching and<br />

fragmenting species than by massive growth forms.<br />

Therefore, staghorn corals are especially suitable for<br />

rehabilitation purposes, not only because of their<br />

capacity to populate a specific target area, but also for<br />

the possibility of rapid regeneration of clearings and<br />

other damages on the source populations. This may not<br />

be the case with most of the slow-growing massive<br />

corals, and that should make them less suitable for<br />

transplantation. However, the usefulness of staghorn<br />

corals may be restricted to habitats with ”sufficient”<br />

shelter from wave action.<br />

IDEAS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH<br />

Experimental data is needed on the suitability for<br />

transplantation of a wide range of coral species in<br />

different habitats (i.e. depth, wave-exposure, water<br />

quality and sediment structure), and on the effects of<br />

– 77 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!