14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The dominant classes are convinced that these will result in growth –<br />

evidently a growth in the form of a champagne goblet, as was shown<br />

by the UNDP, increasing concentration in the wealthier categories of the<br />

population.<br />

However, in the meantime there is a price to pay. This could be so high<br />

that it would be socially and ecologically insupportable. This is why, to<br />

take a long-term view, alternatives are necessary. In other words, a new<br />

paradigm of human development must be established. The present situation<br />

is affecting the very basics of life on the planet, particularly human<br />

life. It is a question of 1) the responsibility of the human species for the<br />

survival of the Earth; 2) finding ways to produce the material bases of<br />

life; 3) collective social and political organization; 4) understanding reality<br />

and the ethics of social construction (culture). Redefining a new paradigm<br />

involves revising these four aspects of the present system.<br />

Obviously, opting for alternatives to the present system and proposing<br />

a new paradigm for human development does not hinder the adoption<br />

of measures to resolve the immediate problems that are the products<br />

of capitalist logic. It is in this sense that Rosa Luxemburg proposed a dialectical<br />

vision of the relationship between reforms and revolution. Thus<br />

it is not possible to scorn social policies that try to remedy the effects<br />

of neo-liberalism: we shall return to this further on. To find a solution,<br />

theoretical and practical, it is necessary to raise again the whole question<br />

of transition.<br />

The transition<br />

As we know, Karl Marx used the concept of transition to describe the<br />

passing from feudalism to capitalism, showing how, little by little, the<br />

forms of the former were incapable of ensuring the conditions of social<br />

survival and its progress, and how new forms developed that transformed<br />

the general mode of production and social formation. Today the<br />

situation is different because, while capitalism has developed new contradictions<br />

and while some forms of socialism have appeared, the<br />

process must be planned in order to accelerate the latter. We do not<br />

366

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!