14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aggravated the economic disaster. This is the result of a ‘capitalism of<br />

generalized monopolies’, as described by Samir Amin, 182 that imposes<br />

its own political solutions.<br />

As regards the climate crisis, the United Nations has organized several<br />

conferences: Rio de Janeiro, Kyoto, Copenhagen, Cancún, Durban, not<br />

to mention conferences on specific themes like the oceans, biodiversity,<br />

etc. Precise measures have been proposed to reduce the emission of<br />

greenhouse gases and diminish environmental destruction. But the industrialized<br />

countries have put brakes on the decision-making and refused<br />

any kind of international agreement (in particular, the United States<br />

of America). Nevertheless in this sector, too, acceptable regulations have<br />

their limits: they must be market friendly.<br />

The food crisis, as Jean Ziegler 183 has so well illustrated, is the result of<br />

the logic of the economic system. In a world in which has produced<br />

more wealth than ever before, the political will is lacking to apply effective<br />

measures. The United States, for example, with fewer agricultural<br />

surpluses, is indeed reducing its assistance to the World Food Programme<br />

(WFP). The integration of agriculture into the logic of monopolistic capitalism<br />

requires the growing concentration of land, the development of<br />

monoculture and the disappearance of family agriculture, and all this<br />

greatly increases the food problem.<br />

The social crisis resulting from the growth of inequalities needs solutions<br />

for structural, agrarian, financial and political reforms that go further than<br />

would be acceptable by the bourgeois classes. The system that they<br />

dominate is so dogmatic that only light and provisional regulations are<br />

tolerated, such as programmes to combat poverty to reduce social pressures<br />

and ecological measures when environmental destruction affects<br />

the rate of profit.<br />

182 Samir Amin, Audace, plus d’Audace, website of the World Forum for Alternatives,<br />

2011<br />

183 Jean Ziegler, Destruction massive – Géopolitique de la Faim, Le Seuil, Paris, 2011<br />

365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!