14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Science however was not just production; it was above all a different<br />

vision of life and society – it was reason. The societies of the World had<br />

evolved under strict religious or obscurantist dogmas, with rules and<br />

codes that not only decided human, household or societal behaviours<br />

and functioning’s, but also of governance systems. These were often<br />

based on strict authorities, based on religious texts or edicts, and subservience<br />

to these authorities could be undermined at the risk of death.<br />

Science and reason secularized not only the civil society, but more importantly<br />

jurisprudence and governance systems. Arguments based on<br />

reason rather than on religious or similar dogmas, evidence, logical thinking<br />

were aspects that truly transformed many societies. Science was<br />

therefore seen not only as the force behind machines, more importantly<br />

it was perceived as the harbinger of a different social structure and discourse,<br />

firmly anchored in democracy. And that is how ‘progress’ was<br />

defined. Science was therefore not supposed to mean merely adding<br />

more scientific knowledge, techniques and machines; it was seen as<br />

the true source of human progress.<br />

The Marxist thinkers of science saw great opportunity in achieving such<br />

progress under the socialist state. They argued that under capitalism,<br />

personal profit rather than the progress of the masses had become the<br />

agenda of the scientific endeavour. Therefore the potential benefit of<br />

science to humanity at large would unravel only under socialist practices.<br />

Even someone as influential and big as Einstein underlined this in his<br />

essay, ‘Why Socialism?’. Since in the 1940s there was no socialist state<br />

except the Soviet Union, but many countries were on the threshold of<br />

gaining freedom from colonial rule, proponents of socialist science like<br />

Bernal, Haldane, Joliot-Curie amongst others particularly stressed on the<br />

need for state planning for science, rather than it being left to industry<br />

and other capitalist interests.<br />

In a sense they cannot be faulted. The achievements of science and its<br />

impacts on society in the twentieth century were simply spectacular.<br />

Airplanes, ships, fast automobiles and trains, radio and television, films,<br />

CDs and DVDs and other entertainment technologies, nylon and other<br />

314

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!