14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

quency associated with black people still continues in spite of the Constitution<br />

having made us citizens with all human rights. Legal action<br />

needs to be taken that condemns these discriminatory practices based<br />

on racial hatred as a crime. Life as a common good must first of all involve<br />

the principle of freedom, which means empowerment both in time<br />

and space. One of these is the body, which is affected by gender, race<br />

and class and this extends to the community bodies in their diverse<br />

forms, discursive and symbolic.<br />

Aware of the results of capitalism, neo-liberal economists are making<br />

alternative proposals from alternative theoretical bases, like those of<br />

Stiglitz, one of the greatest and best critics of the neo-classical model<br />

and Nobel Prizewinner for Economics in 1994. There are also the proposals<br />

of Armartya Sen who starts with the idea of ‘development as<br />

freedom’, taking into account the ethno-cultural and economic particularities<br />

of each people, so that we feel it is important to put forward<br />

some of the notions that contribute to the ‘common good’.<br />

Sen (2000) takes the notion of agency and uses it to give priority to generating<br />

proposals that start from the grassroots upwards, and not the<br />

other way round, while the person who takes action to bring about<br />

changes that become the ‘common good’ will be the motor for generating<br />

action for development with social justice. He bases his proposal<br />

for work with agencies and the public debate on the social participation<br />

of an economic policy that transforms the democratic system based on<br />

basic political, economic and human rights in accordance with the specific<br />

needs and values, both of use and of exchange and not only of<br />

rents, and usefulness based on the priorities of human groups. In this<br />

sense, his position goes further than the concept of human capital as is<br />

utilized in neo-liberalism, using it for an integral, relational and complementary<br />

life that includes harmonious links with nature. Only in this way<br />

can we understand conflictual situations like the famine experienced in<br />

countries that have a high percentage of Afro-descendants – where the<br />

problem is not necessarily one of production but poor mechanisms of<br />

distribution – and the link of production with nature, or between mortality<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!