14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

knowledge and applying the new technologies required to resume agroecological<br />

production.<br />

These processes are based on other values of peasant cultures. Among<br />

them, that of community life, which favors the exchange of new knowledge,<br />

joint or cooperative work, the prospect of a supportive economy,<br />

and practices that favor new relations among democracy, food production<br />

and land care.<br />

BY WAY <strong>OF</strong> CONCLUSION: LIFE <strong>OF</strong> HUMANITY ON EARTH<br />

IN <strong>THE</strong> 21 ST CENTURY<br />

There is virtually unanimous awareness that, without making deep<br />

changes in its way of being, based on the mode of production and consumption<br />

imposed by capitalism, mankind will have immense difficulties,<br />

or even real impossibility, in adapting to the environmental conditions<br />

which will exist from the middle of this century on. In other words, either<br />

we all change, or we all die, as the environmentalist theologian Leonardo<br />

Boff insists. Those who do not accept this are those who, while being<br />

mostly responsible for the imbalance existing on Earth, insist on their<br />

selfish blindness and invest strongly to prevent the advancement of<br />

agreements in favor of deep changes among the peoples on the planet.<br />

It is within this context that Good Living and the cultural forms of peasants’<br />

life emerge like a light for all persons and peoples who want deep<br />

and structural changes, or rather, civilizing ones. A light for those who<br />

perceive that it is no longer possible to continue in the comings and goings<br />

of globalized capitalist neo-liberalism, but did not perceive alternatives;<br />

and light for the leftists who didn’t give in opportunistically to the<br />

extended preservation of democratic formalities in States at the service<br />

of capitalists, and who still have doubts on how to organize socialist societies<br />

different from those built in the countries of real socialism. As<br />

light, they constitute practices and proposals for a path to reach the<br />

Common Good of Humanity.<br />

This is about practices and proposals, not about models. Models should<br />

be rejected. Each people, each society, can be transformed, starting<br />

from the light shed by indigenous peoples’ ongoing and always limited<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!