A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

flicts and many other manifestations of the same kind. To extricate ourselves
from a situation that is globally so disturbing, we clearly need solutions.
The different opinions on the question can be classified in three
categories.
What solutions?
Changing the actors, not the system
Some people, preoccupied mainly with the financial crisis, are in favour
of castigating and replacing those directly responsible for the economic
mess – “the chicken thieves” as Michel Camdessus, former director of
the International Monetary Fund, calls them. This is the theory of the
capitalist system (the neoclassical theory in economics) that sees
favourable signs in all crises, since they make it possible to get rid of
weak or corrupt elements in order to resume accumulation on a sounder
basis. The actors are to be changed, not the system.
Establishing regulations
A second view proposes regulation. It is acknowledged that the market
does not regulate itself and that there should be national and international
bodies that take on the task. The State and specific international
institutions should intervene. Michel Camdessus himself, in a conference
with Catholic entrepreneurs in France, talked of the three hands:
the “invisible hand” of the market, that of regulation by the State and
charity for the victims who do not benefit from either of the two other
hands. One of the main theorists of this regulation was John Maynard
Keynes, the English economist. For this reason the term ‘neo-Keynesian’
is being used in the current context. To regulate the system means saving
it and thus redefining the role of the public bodies (the State and the
international institutions), so necessary for the replication of capital, a
fact that neoliberalism seems to have forgotten since the 1970s (Ernesto
Molina Molina, 2010, 25).
Nevertheless, there are various practical proposals. The G8, for example,
proposed certain regulations of the world economic system, but of a
25