14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the different cultures. And when the cult of the Indians receded, when<br />

they had fragmented into social groups, when money for development<br />

was finished, it was clear that the idea of interculturality was for people<br />

to be all together in the same space, without showing the power relationships<br />

and hiding the class conflicts, including those within the indigenous<br />

populations themselves. From interculturality as a utopia, the<br />

move was to interculturality as goods for tourism.<br />

Emphasis on the ‘lite’ characteristics of the cultures (those that make<br />

differentiation possible without contesting the logic of capitalism) led to<br />

interculturality being experienced as multiculturalism, which is certainly<br />

a point of departure, but which is very far from the interculturality proposal<br />

that had been worked out by the Ecuadorian indigenous organizations<br />

of the 1980s. This interculturality ‘lite’ always conceals the fact<br />

that the development discourse, with all the money poured into the<br />

structural poverty of everyone, actually maintains intact the logic of capitalist<br />

colonial domination.<br />

When rural living ends, the challenges of the city begin<br />

It has already been mentioned that space and time are the two key elements<br />

underpinning domination based on cultural difference. When entire<br />

peoples are condemned to live eternally in the past because of their<br />

culture, it in fact essentializes them: forcing on them models that are always<br />

rigid, static and dead. No living culture can be essentialized. Defining<br />

and demarcating the spaces for peoples with specific cultures to<br />

live, makes them exotic. The idea of existence as a place where everything<br />

good or everything bad exists in total forms, obscures and dehumanizes<br />

entire peoples and regions. And behind the essentializing and<br />

exoticizing, the voices of power are concealed, fixing the parameters of<br />

who is who and where and how they may exist. Existence outside these<br />

systems is persecuted or, more easily, delegitimized by a judgement<br />

that excludes someone from membership of a group: acculturalization<br />

or mixed-race status as a verdict of that judgement are two of the strategies<br />

most utilized.<br />

.<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!