14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHAT MODERNITY? WHAT INTERCULTURALITY?<br />

REFLECTIONS FROM SOUTH AMERICA<br />

GABRIELA BERNAL CARRERA<br />

Introduction: what modernity?<br />

It is a complicated task to try and trace the convergences between European,<br />

Latin American, African and Asian priorities because, in spite of<br />

all our new communications techniques, we simply cannot connect ourselves<br />

with the daily reality of all these worlds. The new technology has<br />

opened a door which it is impossible to pass through, even cursorily.<br />

The pressure of our everyday experiences is so intense that it is impossible<br />

to transmit them across these technological thresholds. This<br />

makes it difficult to find a starting point for analyzing the urgent needs<br />

felt by humanity at this complex historical moment.<br />

Setting aside the discourses that write off the historical responses of<br />

colonized peoples as ‘social resentment’, it is precisely in the re-reading<br />

of colonial history that we can find a point of departure. As far as the<br />

present work is concerned, which seeks to reflect on the role that interculturality<br />

should play in forming the notion of the ‘Common Good of<br />

Humanity’, history enables us to identify the oppressive forms that cultural<br />

differences have created for a large part of humanity.<br />

In the long process that is history, we can identify the conquest of the<br />

Americas as a departure point for both colonizers and colonized. We<br />

choose this as a milestone, not so much for its geographical relevance,<br />

but because after the ‘Discovery’ there was a change in the notion of<br />

‘We’ as Humanity in the European world: the ‘We’ which took shape<br />

first in theological discussions about the humanity of ‘The Other’ (in<br />

other words Indian) and which has reasserted itself these days with discussions<br />

about the parameters for implementing or measuring the development<br />

of underdeveloped peoples. The arguments that are made<br />

from time to time in scientific circles and international organizations<br />

when discussing the plight of ‘the losers’ are more or less a continuation<br />

233

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!