14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The climate crisis<br />

The climate crisis is well recognized and, every day, information becomes<br />

increasingly precise, thanks to the various conferences of the<br />

United Nations on the climate, on biodiversity, on glaciers, etc. Here we<br />

shall just briefly sum up the situation. While the present development<br />

model is emitting greenhouse gases (especially CO2), the carbon sinks<br />

- that is, the natural places where these gases are absorbed, particularly<br />

forests and oceans - are being destroyed. In addition, the destruction of<br />

ecosystems through the massive application of chemical products,<br />

monocultures, exploitation of natural resources like oil, gas and minerals<br />

are producing irreversible damage which can even affect the climate.<br />

There are two more aspects that are not always sufficiently emphasized.<br />

The first is the ‘ecological debt’. Since the beginning of mercantile capitalism,<br />

the natural resources of the South have been exploited at enormous<br />

human and ecological cost. The ‘externalities’ of this plundering<br />

have been borne exclusively by the colonized regions. The political independence<br />

of these countries did not change the logic of the relationship.<br />

Over the last few years, the land grabbing and over-exploitation of<br />

mines to satisfy the needs of the North have accelerated, causing ecological<br />

disasters, not to mention social conflicts. Thus the ecological debt<br />

must be taken into account in the external public and private debt of the<br />

countries of the South. It is only fair that the consumers of products that<br />

have been extracted from the South should be the ones to pay the consequences<br />

of these ‘externalities’ (ecological and social damages). Indeed,<br />

in this way, they really have contracted a debt. The other aspect<br />

is the ecological costs of military activities. First, wars are extremely<br />

wasteful and affect nature by the ecological destruction caused by<br />

bombing, the utilization of chemical products 4 and CO2 emissions.<br />

Moreover, the production of armaments involves using materials that<br />

4 Agent Orange, used during the Vietnam war to destroy forests where the guerrillas<br />

were fighting in the South, is still causing – forty years later – a huge amount of<br />

destruction and affects thousands of children who are born with deformities because<br />

of the accumulation of toxic products.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!