14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

demands egalitarian distribution (ibid., 38) and implies promoting use<br />

value over exchange value. It poses the question of limits to growth in<br />

order to preserve the natural surroundings (respect for Mother Earth).<br />

For this reason, the vision of sumak kawsay has to take into account,<br />

not only the processes of production, but also those of reproduction<br />

(ibid., 38). Finally it is a question of giving new meaning to geographical<br />

space (ibid., 20): that is, to the territories that play a central role in the<br />

life of the indigenous communities.<br />

c) Organizing another State<br />

The long struggles of the indigenous peoples have shown that they have<br />

a very negative view of the State. Not only did the colonial State radically<br />

destroy them; the post-colonial nation-State excluded them from public<br />

life. In addition, with neoliberalism the nation-State has lost much of its<br />

national status through globalized commerce. Hence the concept of a<br />

pluri-national State has been taken up by the Constitutions of Ecuador<br />

and Bolivia. It is a question of finding a difficult equilibrium between, on<br />

the one hand, the nation-State that is emerging from a neoliberal period<br />

that had reduced its functions in order to open up space for the market<br />

and, on the other, the indigenous people, who are recovering their identities<br />

and seeking their autonomy. For the National Plan of Ecuador, this<br />

means a decentralization and the organization of a ‘polycentric’ State,<br />

but not a weakened one (38). The conflicts between the indigenous organization<br />

in Ecuador and in Bolivia show that it is not easy to find practical<br />

solutions to this problem.<br />

There are two different conceptions of the communal: the first conceives<br />

the community as a way of organizing a reduced segment of society (particularly<br />

rural), which, according to Floresmilo Simbaña is an achronistic<br />

and ineffectual in the contemporary situation. The other, quoting Luis<br />

Macas, considers the community as one of the key institutions “in the<br />

process of reconstructing the peoples and the ancestral nations … [necessary]<br />

… for the historical and ideological reproduction of the Indian<br />

peoples”. According to the former leader of CONAIE, in this sense, the<br />

commune and the territory is a living totality that, as Norma Aguilar says,<br />

“is the fundamental axis that expresses and gives coherence to indige-<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!