14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

presupposes a harmonious relationship between humanity and Mother<br />

Earth, thanks to putting into practice the ancestral calendar and its cosmovision,<br />

particularly as concerns Father Sun and Mother Moon. For<br />

Manuel Castro, it is a question of specific cultural values and also of ancestral<br />

science and technology (2010, 4-7). In this sense, both Josef Esterman<br />

(1993) and Eduardo Gudynas (2009) talk of a ‘cosmic ethic’.<br />

Non-indigenous intellectuals have also made statements on the subject.<br />

Alberto Acosta, a leftwing economist and former president of the Constituent<br />

Assembly, writes that the adoption of sumak kawsay into political<br />

thinking in Ecuador means that it is “a demonstration that it is<br />

possible to open the door to the construction of a democratic society,<br />

receiving both the proposals of the indigenous peoples and nationalities,<br />

as well as broad sectors of the rest of the population. At the same time<br />

it contributes considerably to the debates for change that are developing<br />

in the world” (2009, 7). Acosta had previously stated that the concept<br />

of sumak kawsay “is concerned with a series of social, economic and<br />

environmental rights and guarantees” (ibid.). As for Magdalena León,<br />

from a feminist viewpoint she introduces the concept of the “economy<br />

of human concern” (2010, 150) as an expression of sumak kawsay because<br />

“it recovers the idea of life as the basis and central key of the<br />

economy” (2009, 63). For Pablo Dávalos, the idea “reintegrates nature<br />

into history as it is inherent to social existence” (quoted by E. Gudynas,<br />

2011, 6). Jorge García has no hesitation in writing that sumak kawsay<br />

represents the “art of living” (2004). It is, however, Eduardo Gudynas<br />

who has published the most on the subject and we shall often be citing<br />

him on various occasions here. His position is very clear: the notion of<br />

‘buen vivir’ is a criticism of the current development model and a call to<br />

build a quality of life that includes both people and nature (E.Gudynas.<br />

2011, 2). René Ramírez, National Secretary for Planning, one of the authors<br />

of the National Development Plan, writes that the idea implies the<br />

satisfaction of needs, quality of life, loving and being loved, peace and<br />

harmony with nature, protection of culture and of biodiversity (René<br />

Ramírez, 2010, 139). In summing up his position, Ramírez refers to “bioequality<br />

and republican bio-socialism”, stressing the combination be-<br />

210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!