14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Two world wars, the Great Depression<br />

of 1929 – which brought capitalism to the brink of collapse –<br />

fascism and the Holocaust were the results. The state socialist etatism<br />

and communism that arose as counter-movements degenerated for<br />

decades into the Stalinist Terror and the Chinese Cultural Revolution.<br />

After the Second World War, a solution seemed to have been found<br />

which would reconcile capitalism and democracy and end the self-destruction<br />

of modern capitalism. Capitalism, the welfare state and democracy<br />

entered into a state of symbiosis (Marshall 1992). A permanently<br />

high growth rate lasting almost three decades enabled the Western<br />

world to reach the so-called Fordist distribution compromise between<br />

employers and wage earners, the development of the welfare state, and<br />

a consolidation of representative democracy – not least as a result of<br />

concessions made to the workers out of fear of the competing system.<br />

The slackening of economic growth in the 1970s caused the short-lived<br />

“dream of everlasting prosperity” (Burckhardt Lutz) to burst. The overaccumulation<br />

of capital made a comeback. New capital investments<br />

brought in ever lower returns, or turned out to be completely unprofitable.<br />

The domination of capital ran up against the very same limits<br />

drawn by the welfare state and democracy: a strong working class; an<br />

expanded social sector; demands for democratic co-determination at<br />

the workplace, in the enterprise, in community and society; the call for<br />

self-determination at work and in the individual’s own life. The “old” social<br />

movements became radicalized, while “new” ones arose.<br />

Society was faced with a choice: either there would be a further repulse<br />

of the domination of capital and increasing democratization of the economy<br />

and of enterprises, as well as a shortening of working hours and<br />

the creation of individual leisure opportunities going beyond mere consumption,<br />

or else new sources of accumulation would have to be created<br />

by unleashing capitalism and deregulating the financial, capital,<br />

commodity and labour markets in the course of “globalization”. The latter<br />

included expropriation through privatization of facilities built by and<br />

for the public, or the reduction of social assets, rights and achievements<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!