14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

So ‘another growth’ or even a ‘de-growth’ [63] is not only necessary, it’s<br />

also feasible. We have to reject consumerist delusions and orient the<br />

economy towards human development in harmony with the boundaries<br />

of nature. 73 According to Foster et. al., quantitative growth has to be<br />

substituted by qualitative growth. That means ‘bringing mere quantitative<br />

growth (in aggregate terms as currently measured) to a halt in the<br />

rich countries, and then reversing growth, while at the same time qualitatively<br />

expanding the range of human capacities and possibilities and<br />

the diversity of nature.’ 74 To achieve this goal, new measures of the economic<br />

activity are necessary. In the recent past there were interesting<br />

proposals to substitute GDP by the Genuine Progress Index (GPI) or the<br />

Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW). 75<br />

The idea of a fundamental change of the economic logic is slowly gaining<br />

ground in government circles. At the World Peoples’ Conference on Climate<br />

Change and the Rights of Mother Earth in Cochabamba, April<br />

2010, Maria Fernanda Espinosa, Minister of Cultural Patrimony of<br />

Ecuador stood up for a radical review of the economy: ‘We must no longer<br />

grow and accumulate. We must found a new way of building the<br />

economy and of interacting with nature. The structural causes of climate<br />

change and of all the world’s problems are of the same order, and so<br />

also must be the responses. They must be structural, revolutionary, and<br />

deep.’ 76 So it’s reassuring that the desire of another economic paradigm<br />

and practice is not limited to academic circles or pressure groups. But,<br />

as we all know, a lot remains to be done.<br />

I conclude this part mentioning two possible pitfalls. The first pitfall is<br />

to see consumption as the whipping boy. It is true that we will have to<br />

alter our consumption pattern. But it is production and not consumption<br />

73 Herrera R., Un autre capitlaisme n’est pas possible, Paris 2010, p. 80f.<br />

74 Foster J., Clark B. & York R., op. cit., p. 396.<br />

75 http://www.sustainablemeasures.com/Training/Indicators/GPI.html.<br />

76 Espinosa M., ‘Climate Crisis: A Symptom of the Development Model of the<br />

World Capitalist System’, Speech to the Panel on Structural Causes of Climate<br />

Change, World Peoples’ Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother<br />

Earth, Cochabamba, April 20, 2010, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/espinosa300610.html.<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!