14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Counter Dynamics<br />

To realise the Common Good of Humanity, we need to stop the Common<br />

Bad. That means that we have to put a stop to the dynamic de -<br />

scribed above and reinstall another, new dynamic. Such a new dynamic<br />

or logic is in some way a reflection and antitype of the old one.<br />

Buen vivir<br />

The most fundamental task is to restore the hierarchy of the spheres.<br />

In this respect Aristotle is very useful, but one has to notice that nature<br />

and environment were not present in his view. So we have to add this<br />

vital dimension. With this indigenous traditions (Pacha Mama) can be<br />

very helpful. The good life (eudamonia) has to be completed with respect<br />

for nature [The first of the new paradigms]. I think this combination<br />

comes close to the meaning of the concept buen vivir. [50]<br />

In the first place the economic sphere has to be submitted to the political.<br />

The allocation of capital and distribution of economic surplus, trade and<br />

finance, etc. must be subordinated to the priorities and needs of the community<br />

of the present and future generations. That implies that the economy<br />

must be regulated within a democratic framework of citizen-based<br />

social accountability. 45 In the second place both economic activities as the<br />

political decision making have to be thoroughly permeated by values like<br />

tenderness and carefulness(towards men and nature), equality, solidarity,<br />

cooperation, responsibility, altruism, respect, dignity... 46<br />

The October Revolution (1917) and the Chinese Revolution (1949) were<br />

the first to break with the capitalist system and logic. Both societies<br />

changed the capitalist hierarchy of spheres. In the Soviet Union – and<br />

later in the Eastern bloc – the economic sphere was again submitted to<br />

the political sphere, i.e. the communist party. But for various reasons<br />

the sphere of the ideas and ideals was gradually neglected, alienating<br />

the population from the political line. There was a gap between the leadership<br />

and the people and the system finally collapsed.<br />

45 Dierckxsens W., op. cit., p. 140.<br />

46 Mészáros I., The Structural Crisis of Capital, New York 2010, p. 162-3.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!