14.11.2012 Views

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

A POSTCAPITALIST PARADIGM: THE COMMON GOOD OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The most extreme among them go so far as to call for the suppression,<br />

pure and simple, of State institutions – including the army – as well as<br />

a privatization of the currency. Of course they are aware that these<br />

measures would push capitalism towards chaos, but they think that,<br />

thanks to the market mechanism, such chaos would benefit capital and<br />

that capitalism would reconstitute itself faster and better than through<br />

State interventions in the form of artificial public assistance to enterprises<br />

that in any case were doomed to fail.<br />

3. And what about the reformist positions? The gravity of the situation<br />

has favoured a return to the theses of Keynes: “Keynes is today, more<br />

than ever the flavour of the month” wrote Paul Krugman, who is a neoclassical<br />

economist! In fact, even if they oppose the traditional neoclassical<br />

theses about State interventions, neo-Keynesian interpretations<br />

come from the same theoretical matrix, which we would call ‘bourgeois’.<br />

For the most advanced among them, in spite of nuances, variants and<br />

subtleties, their visions are hardly ‘reformist’ since they consist of introducing<br />

minimal changes in the functioning of capitalism in order that it<br />

can survive as long as possible.<br />

The report of the Stiglitz Commission is a good illustration. Its final document,<br />

drawn up in 2009 at the request of the president of the United<br />

Nations General Assembly, does not question the bases of the dominant<br />

ideology. The old neoliberal certainties have only to be re-vised, not to<br />

be abandoned: exchange rates should be flexible, the virtues of free<br />

trade are reaffirmed as against the ‘dangers of protectionism’, the defects<br />

of corporate governance should be corrected, but the management<br />

of risks continues to be entrusted to the financial oligopolies and the<br />

regulation of the world system remains under the hegemony of the US<br />

dollar.<br />

We are a long way from the rejection of globalized financial liberalization<br />

as expressed by an increasing number of the countries of the South –<br />

not without contradictions, it is true – from the People’s Republic of<br />

China to Bolivarian Venezuela.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!