Annexure XIV Continued… - Edelweiss

Appeal, Bharatpur who disallowed the appeal. RECL has filed an appeal before Tax Board, Ajmer. The
amount involved in this appeal is ` 53.96 million. The matter is currently pending.
6. RECL v. CTO, Dholpur before JCCT (Appeal), Dhanbad
The CTO Dholpur passed an order dated December 9, 2002 for non submission of C forms. A demand of
` 10.04 million was raised. RECL filed an appeal before the DC (Appeal), Bharatpur. The amount involved in
this appeal is ` 10.04 million. The matter is currently pending.
11. Blastec (India) Private Limited (“BIPL”)
Cases filed against BIPL
Tax
BIPL v. Sales Tax Commissioner, Satna
BIPL filed an appeal before Sales Tax Commissioner, Satna against the order of Assistant Commissioner of
Sales Tax wherein the said authority has made an addition of ` 0.49 million on account of Value Added tax,
Central Sales Tax and Entry Tax. The matter is currently pending.
12. Kalinga Coal Mining Private Limited (“KCMPL”)
Cases filed against KCMPL
Tax
KCMPL v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Bhubaneswar for Notice under section 148
of the I.T. Act for A.Y. 2008-2009
KCMPL has received a notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act from Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Circle 1(1), Bhubaneswar dated September 21, 2010 requiring filing of return pursuant to section 148 since the
assessing officer has reasons to believe that income of the company for A.Y. 2008-2009 has escaped
assessment. A reply was submitted on October 21, 2010 declaring the original return filed as return pursuant to
notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act and requesting the assessing officer to give reasons recorded for
issuance of notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act. However no reply has been received and the matter is
currently pending.
13. Orichem Limited (“OL”)
Cases filed against OL
Tax
1. OL v. Sales Tax Department before Sales Tax Tribunal, Cuttak, Orissa
OL has filed various cases before the Central Sales Tax Tribunal in respect of the pending demands for ` 0.28
million, 0.66 million, 0.01 million, ` 0.04 million, ` 0.12 million and ` 0.04 million for the A.Y. 1990-91,
1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-1996 and 1998-1999, respectively. The cases pertain to various
demands like disallowance of freight and insurance for calculation of taxable turnover. The cases are currently
pending.
2. OL v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax for A.Y. 1998-1999
OL has filed an appeal with Sales Tax Tribunal against the order of Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax
wherein a demand of ` 10.74 million has been raised on account of unpaid ‘C’ forms and for tax calculated at
12% instead of 4%.The matter is currently pending.
3. OL v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax for A.Y. 1999-2000
336