Annexure XIV Continued… - Edelweiss

sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC, sections 5, 9-B, 9-C of the Explosives Act and sections 5
and 6 of Explosive Substances Act. The aforementioned chargesheets in relation to no. F.I. R No. 161/2010,
F.I. R No. 310/2010 and F.I. R. No. 427/2010 are currently pending before Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,
Madhya Pradesh, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chanderi, Madhya Pradesh and court at Dholpur, Rajasthan,
respectively.
In these cases the employees of RECL namely, Mr. B.D. Aggarwal, managing director, Mr. Edward Kelly,
director marketing, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal, marketing manager, Mr. Vinod Kumar Garg, chief
marketing manager were arrested and their bail applications are currently pending.
Tax
1. RECL v. Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal before High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur
RECL has filed an appeal with Rajasthan High Court against the order no. A/184/05 NBS dated February 23,
2005 passed by CESTAT. The matter pertains to demand of ` 0.97 million raised vide case no. 82/CE -
demand -98 dated December 21, 1998. RECL has filed an appeal against this order with CESTAT who in its
order no. A/1736/01-NB(S/M) dated December 10, 2001 dismissed the appeal. RECL approached Rajasthan
High Court and remanded back the case to CESTAT vide its order dated April 30, 2003. CEGAT vide its order
no A/1387/03 dated November 12, 2003 remanded back the matter to Commissioner, Jaipur. The
Commissioner, Jaipur rejected the submissions of RECL in its order no. 185(SN) dated April 28, 2004. An
appeal was filed with CESTAT which was rejected vide its order no. A/184/05/NBS dated February, 2005. An
appeal has been filed against this order before Rajasthan High Court. The amount involved in this appeal is `
0.97 million. The matter is currently pending.
2. RECL v. Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal before Rajasthan High Court
RECL has filed an appeal with Rajasthan High Court on May 26, 2010 against the order passed by CESTAT
dated July 27, 2009. The matter pertains to a demand of ` 15.45 million raised vide order no. dated 36/2000
dated October 31, 2000. The matter was earlier with CESTAT which remanded the same to the Commissioner,
Jaipur vide order no. A/403-411/2002 NBD dated April 15, 2002 and the Commissioner by his order No. V
(3602)15/ off/38/98/3243 dated August 29, 2006 has confirmed the earlier order. Against this order RECL
again filed an appeal before the CESTAT and the CESTAT in its order No. 120-23/08-EX dated March 19,
2008 set aside the earlier order and again remanded back to the Commissioner Jaipur for cross examination.
The Commissioner after due cross examination, in his order dated May 05, 2009 again confirmed the original
demand, penalty and interest, however, the penalty imposed upon the employees have been waived. The
Company had filed an appeal before the CESTAT on July 27, 2009. CESTAT dismissed the appeal. RECL has
filed an appeal with Rajasthan High Court against the said order of CESTAT. The amount involved in this
appeal is ` 15.45 million. The matter is currently pending.
3. RECL v. CESTAT before Rajasthan High Court
RECL has filed an appeal with the Rajasthan High Court on March 29, 2004 against the order no.
M/172/2003passed by CESTAT dated September 16, 2003. The matter pertains to a demand of ` 43.13 million
raised on February 23, 2001 on account of Excise Duty.
4. RECL v. CESTAT before Rajasthan High Court
RECL has filed an appeal with Rajasthan High Court against the order no. A/1553 passed by CESTAT dated
December 16, 2003. The matter pertains to a demand of ` 0.02 million towards Excise Duty raised on April
30, 1998. The amount involved in this appeal is ` 0.02 million. The matter is currently pending.
5. RECL v. Sales Tax Department before Tax Board, Ajmer
The Sales Tax Department has raised a demand of ` 35.59 million vide order dated May 4, 2001 on the basis
of an order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. The company has filed an appeal on July
26, 2001 before the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal), Jaipur. The case was transferred to
assistant commissioner commercial taxes, Bharatpur and a demand of ` 53.96 million including interest was
raised by assistant commissioner commercial taxes. RECL filed an appeal before Deputy Commissioner.
335