Annexure XIV Continued… - Edelweiss

SMASL has filed a writ petition no. 23378/2010 before Orissa High Court under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India challenging the approval order dated December 8, 2010 regarding the recovery of the
excess payment from coal transport contract awarded for the works under the notice inviting tender 372 dated
October 18, 2005. Under the aforesaid order Mahanadi Coalfield Limited reduced the distance from 9-10
kilometres to 8-9 kilometres thereby reducing the rate from ` 36.49 per MT to ` 32.84 per MT. The Orissa
High Court issued notices to the parties and stayed the recovery till next date. The matter is currently pending.
3. SMASL v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Review petition no 66/2010 was filed before the Division
Bench, Orissa High Court
Review Petition No. 66 of 2010 before the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court
SMASL has filed a review petition no. 66 of 2010 before the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court arising
out of the judgement passed by the said Division Bench in writ petition no. 5203 of 2009 on March 11 2010.
SMASL filed a writ petition no. 5203 of 2009 before the Orissa High Court praying the illegal, arbitrary action
of Mahanadi Coalfield Limited in issuing the letter dated March 02, 2009 for cancelling the contract and
forfeiture of earnest money for ` 0.75 million deposited in pursuant to notice inviting tender 477 dated March
26, 2008. The matter is currently pending.
5. Shyam Indus Power Solution Private Limited (“SIPSPL”)
Cases filed against SIPSPL
Writ Petition
Writ Petition No.6656 of 09 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur
SIPSPL issued an assessment order no. 383 dated April 28, 2009 to Mr. Man Mohan Tanwani for the usage of
the electricity. Mr. Man Mohan Tanwani filed a writ petition no.6656 of 09 under article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India against the aforesaid assessment order issued by SIPSPL inter-alia praying for its
quashing. The matter is currently pending.
Consumer Cases
14 consumer complaints under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have been filed against SIPSL
before the District Consumer Forum Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. The complainants under the said complaints
have alleged deficiency in services by SIPSPL. The complaints are currently pending disposal at various stages
of adjudication.
Cases filed by SIPSPL
Criminal
SIPSPL has lodged 212 complaints before the Special Court under Electricity Act, 2003 against various
consumers in relation to theft of electricity. These complaints are currently pending and the aggregate amount
involved therein is ` 3.92 million.
6. Rudra Sen & Brothers (JV) Project Private Limited (“RSBJVPL”)
Cases filed by RSBJVPL
A scheme of arrangement with the existing shareholders of the RSBJVPL was filed under section 391-394 of
the Companies Act before the Delhi High Court whereby the immovable property situated at 23 and 25
Rajdoot Marg, New Delhi standing in the name of such shareholders shall be taken over by the company
which in turn will allot shares to those shareholders in lieu thereof.
7. Sindhu Farms Private Limited (“SFPL”)
Cases filed by SFPL
332