Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9. SMASL v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax before the CESTAT, Kolkata<br />
CESTAT STA no. 90 of 2010<br />
SMASL filed an appeal CESTAT STA no. 90 of 2010 on March 29, 2010 before CESTAT, Kolkata under the<br />
Finance Act against the order passed by Joint Commissioner with respect to show cause notice no.-<br />
IV(4)57.S.Tax/B-I/07/26605A dated October, 22, 2007 pertaining to recovery of Service Tax amounting to<br />
` 0.5 million (excluding interest and penalty, if any) chargeable on cargo handling services provided during<br />
the period August 16, 2002 to March 31, 2007. The demand of ` 0.5 million has already been deposited. The<br />
matter is currently pending.<br />
10. SMASL v. Joint Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax before the Commissioner Appeal,<br />
Ranchi<br />
SMASL filed an appeal on August 24, 2009 before Commissioner Appeal, Ranchi under the Finance Act<br />
against the order passed by Additional Commissioner of Central Excise , Ranchi on May 29, 2009 with respect<br />
to show cause notice no. V(17)(80)/75/Sainik/Adjn/Ran/07/3134dated April 11, 2008 pertaining to recovery of<br />
Service Tax amounting to ` 4.44 million (excluding interest and penalty if any) chargeable on business<br />
auxiliary and site formation services provided during the period October 1, 2006 to February 5, 2007.The<br />
Commissioner Appeal, Ranchi remanded back the case vide its order in original no.09/Ran/2010 dated January<br />
29, 2010 for re-adjudication by the Additional Commissioner. The matter is currently pending.<br />
Cases filed by SMASL<br />
Statutory<br />
1. Suo-moto application filed by SMASL for compounding<br />
SMASL filed a suo-moto application on January 12, 2009 under section 621A of the Companies Act, before<br />
Central Government through the RoC for compounding of offence committed under Section 297 of the<br />
Companies Act. The matter is currently pending.<br />
2. Application under section 11(4) under the Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment<br />
of arbitrator<br />
SMASL has filed an application under section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, 1996 before the<br />
Orissa High Court, at Cuttack for the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the matter related to work order<br />
issued pursuant to NIT-318 at Lakhanpur for the open cast project during the period July 17, 2004 to January<br />
11, 2009. The amount withheld by Mahanadi Coalfields Limited is ` 44.14 million on account of said work<br />
order. The case has been admitted and date of hearing is yet to be decided.<br />
Writ Petitions<br />
1. SMASL v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Writ Petition no. 22745/2010 before Orissa High Court, at<br />
Cuttack<br />
Writ Petition no. 22745 of 2010 before Orissa High Court<br />
SMASL has filed a writ petition no. 22745/2010 before Orissa High Court under Article 226/227 of the<br />
Constitution of India challenging the approval order dated December 8, 2010 regarding the recovery of the<br />
excess payment from coal transport contract awarded for the works under NIT 240 dated March 07, 2002<br />
wherein the Mahanadi Coalfield Limited reduced the distance from 9-10 kilometres to 8-9 kilometres thereby<br />
reducing the rate from ` 28.25 per MT to ` 26.70 per MT. The Orissa High Court issued notices to the parties<br />
and stayed the recovery till next date.<br />
2. SMASL v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Writ Petition no 23378/2010 before Orissa High Court<br />
Writ Petition no 23378 of 2010 before Orissa High Court<br />
331