Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. SHL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8(1), New Delhi before CIT Appeals – XI, New<br />
Delhi for A.Y. 2008-2009<br />
Appeal no. 262/10-11 of 2011 before the CIT Appeal– XI, New Delhi<br />
SHL filed an appeal no. 262/10-11 before the CIT Appeals – XI, New Delhi on January 31, 2011 against the<br />
Assessment order dated December 30, 2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8(1),<br />
New Delhi. The assessing officer has disallowed interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the I.T. Act of ` 0.134<br />
million; ` 27 million on account of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the I.T. Act and ` 0.10 million<br />
on account of disallowance under section 14A of the I.T. Act. Accordingly a demand of ` 12.38 million was<br />
raised. An amount totalling ` 2.47 million has already been deposited/adjusted and the matter is currently<br />
pending.<br />
2. Notice received from Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax for scrutiny proceeding for A.Y. 2009-2010<br />
SHL has received a notice under section 143(2) of the I.T. Act dated August 18, 2010 from Deputy<br />
Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8(1), New Delhi for scrutiny assessment proceedings calling for certain<br />
information and record. SHL has submitted the details and information as sought by the Income Tax Officer<br />
from time to time and the assessment proceedings are currently pending.<br />
3. SHL v. Bijender and others before the Assistant Collector, Kalanour<br />
SHL and Sindhu Farms Private Limited jointly filed an application on October 19, 2010 under Land Revenue<br />
Act before Assistant Collector, 1 st Grade, Kalanaur, Rohtak, Haryana against Bijender and others for partition<br />
of Khewat No.31/20. The said application is currently pending.<br />
3.4 Uttaranchal Finance Limited<br />
Due to non compliance with the provisions of the listing agreement, the Delhi Stock Exchange vide its order<br />
dated May 6, 2002 suspended trading in the securities of Uttaranchal Finance Limited. However, this<br />
suspension was revoked by Delhi Stock Exchange vide letter no. DSE/LIST/8267/R/323 dated April 21, 2009.<br />
3.5 Parnami Habitat Developers Limited<br />
Due to non Compliance with the listing agreement, the Delhi Stock Exchange suspended the trading in the<br />
securities of Parnami Habitat Developers Limited. This suspension was revoked by DSE vide letter no.<br />
DSE/LIST/9383/R/322 dated April 21, 2009.<br />
4. Sainik Mining and Allied Services Limited (“SMASL”)<br />
Cases filed against SMASL<br />
Labour<br />
1. Labour Enforcement Officer (Central) v. SMASL before Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad<br />
Case no. 169/2007 before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad under section 23 and 24 of CLRA<br />
A prosecution report under section 23 and 24 of the CLRA was filed by the Labour Enforcement Officer<br />
(Central), Katrasgarh against SMASL with the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad for the alleged violation of<br />
the provisions of CLRA. The matter was transferred to the court of 1 st Class Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad for<br />
disposal in accordance with law. Summons for appearance were issued to Mr. Rudra Sen Sindhu and Kuldeep<br />
Singh Solanki. The matter is currently pending.<br />
2. Labour Enforcement Officer (Central) v. SMASL before Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad<br />
Case No. 163/2008 was registered before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad under section 23 and 24 of<br />
CLRA<br />
328
Change language