Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Annexure XIV Continued⦠- Edelweiss
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SCPL has filed an appeal no. (3778/Mum-2010) dated May 11, 2010 before ITAT, Mumbai against the CIT<br />
Appeals – 2, Mumbai order dated February 22, 2010 where the CIT held the penalty appeal filed by SCPL is<br />
invalid as the said appeal was signed by the director of SCPL instead of its managing director. The amount<br />
involved in the appeal is ` 5.57 million and matter is currently pending.<br />
7. SCPL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai before the CIT Appeals for the<br />
A.Y. 2001-2002<br />
SCPL has filed an appeal dated September 23, 2009 before CIT Appeals against the assessment order dated<br />
August 25, 2009 passed by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Circle 1(3), Mumbai under section 143(3)<br />
read with section 254 of the I.T. Act. The assessing officer has reduced the unabsorbed depreciation claim by `<br />
21.51 million. The matter is currently pending before CIT Appeal.<br />
8. SCPL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai before ITAT for Assessment Year<br />
2001-2002<br />
SCPL has filed an appeal no. (3779/Mum-2010) dated May 11, 2010 before ITAT Mumbai against the CIT<br />
Appeals – 2, Mumbai order dated February 22, 2010. SCPL had filed an appeal before the CIT Appeal-<br />
Mumbai against the penalty levied by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai vide<br />
penalty order dated August 31, 2009. The CIT Appeals vide its aforesaid order held the penalty appeal filed by<br />
SCPL is invalid since the same was signed by director instead of managing director of SCPL and dismissed the<br />
penalty appeal filed by SCPL. The amount involved in the appeal is ` 8.51 million and matter is currently<br />
pending.<br />
9. SCPL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai before ITAT for the A.Y. 2002-<br />
2003<br />
SCPL has filed an appeal no. (1075/Mum-2011) dated February 7, 2011 to ITAT, Mumbai against the CIT<br />
Appeals – 2, Mumbai order dated February 22, 2010. The CIT Appeals has held the appeal as invalid since the<br />
same was signed by director instead of managing director of SCPL and dismissed the appeal filed by SCPL.<br />
SCPL was in appeal before the CIT Appeals – 2, Mumbai against the assessment order dated August 25, 2009<br />
passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai under section 143(3) read with<br />
section 254 of the I.T. Act. The assessing officer has reduced the unabsorbed depreciation claim by ` 16.11<br />
million and revised the set off of losses claimed in A.Y. 2002-2003. Accordingly, a demand of<br />
` 17.73 million was raised which has been deposited / adjusted against refunds due to SCPL. The amount<br />
involved in the appeal is ` 17.73 million and the matter is currently pending.<br />
10. SCPL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai before CIT Appeals for the A.Y.<br />
2002-2003<br />
Without prejudice to its right to appeal before ITAT for A.Y. 2002-2003, SCPL has filed an appeal before CIT<br />
Appeals on January 24 2011 once again with condonation request to decide the appeal on merits. SCPL was in<br />
appeal before CIT Appeals – 2, Mumbai against the assessment order dated August 25 2009 passed by Deputy<br />
Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the I.T. Act.<br />
The assessing officer has reduced the unabsorbed depreciation claim by ` 16.11 million and revised the set off<br />
of losses claimed in A.Y. 2002-2003. As a result, demand of ` 17.73 million was raised which has been<br />
deposited / adjusted against refunds due to SCPL. The amount involved in the appeal is ` 17.73 million and<br />
matter is currently pending.<br />
11. SCPL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai before ITAT for A.Y. 2002-2003<br />
SCPL has filed an appeal no. (3780/Mum-2010) dated May 11, 2010 before the ITAT Mumbai against the CIT<br />
Appeals - 2 Mumbai order dated February 22, 2010. The CIT Appeals has held the penalty appeal as invalid<br />
since the same was signed by director instead of managing director and dismissed the penalty appeal filed by<br />
SCPL. SCPL was in appeal before the CIT Appeal-2 Mumbai against the penalty levied by the Deputy<br />
Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-I (3) Mumbai vide penalty order dated August 31, 2009. The amount<br />
involved in the appeal is ` 5.75 million and the matter is currently pending.<br />
12. SCPL v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3), Mumbai before the ITAT for the A.Y. 2004-<br />
2005<br />
321
Change language