Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation
Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation
Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 Introduction<br />
1.1 Why a <strong>Biotechnology</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong><br />
In deciding to develop this <strong>Roadmap</strong> the Minister<br />
of RS&T recognised a number of distinctive aspects<br />
about the role that biotechnology research plays in<br />
New Zeal<strong>and</strong>:<br />
• <strong>Biotechnology</strong> research has a key role to play in<br />
driving economic transformation in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>,<br />
both through incremental productivity gains in<br />
the primary sector <strong>and</strong> diversifying the economy<br />
through the emergence of new firms <strong>and</strong> economic<br />
niches.<br />
• <strong>Biotechnology</strong> research also has an important<br />
environmental role to play, for example, through<br />
the development of tools <strong>and</strong> techniques to protect<br />
New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s environment from biosecurity<br />
incursions, as well as assisting our industries in<br />
developing cleaner, more sustainable industrial<br />
processes.<br />
• New Zeal<strong>and</strong> cannot invest in the full range of<br />
R&D associated with biotechnology or compete<br />
effectively with global efforts in some areas. New<br />
Zeal<strong>and</strong> needs to be selective in the areas it<br />
chooses, <strong>and</strong> this <strong>Roadmap</strong> has a role in helping<br />
guide those investment choices.<br />
• <strong>Biotechnology</strong> applications can raise cultural <strong>and</strong><br />
ethical issues <strong>and</strong> ongoing research is required to<br />
gauge how New Zeal<strong>and</strong>ers view them <strong>and</strong> how we<br />
can best respond to these issues.<br />
In preparing this <strong>Roadmap</strong> we have:<br />
• worked closely with an Advisory Group 1 that has<br />
advised on the context, issues <strong>and</strong> directions;<br />
• developed an analysis of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
current biotechnology R&D, The New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Biotechnology</strong> <strong>Research</strong> L<strong>and</strong>scape;<br />
• held a series of regional workshops (May 2006)<br />
with, <strong>and</strong> received formal submissions from,<br />
research, industry <strong>and</strong> government agency<br />
representatives (October 2006);<br />
• commissioned a report to quantify the<br />
Government’s investments in biotechnology<br />
research; 2<br />
• built on the work that has been completed<br />
following on from the publication of the<br />
New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Strategy <strong>and</strong> The<br />
<strong>Biotechnology</strong> Taskforce Report; <strong>and</strong><br />
• drawn information from a range of research <strong>and</strong><br />
policy reports (listed in Annex One: References).<br />
1<br />
Representatives on the Advisory Group were from the Foundation for <strong>Research</strong>, <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> Technology (FRST), the Health <strong>Research</strong> Council (HRC), the Royal Society<br />
of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, the Ministry of Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Forestry, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Trade <strong>and</strong> Enterprise (NZTE), the <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Taskforce <strong>and</strong> NZBio.<br />
2<br />
Gilbertson (2005): Analysis of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Government Investment in <strong>Biotechnology</strong> R&D 2004/05 Funding Year (partially updated by MoRST, March 2006)<br />
6 <strong>Roadmap</strong>s for <strong>Science</strong> : biotechnology research