08.02.2015 Views

Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation

Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation

Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2.1 Directions: Economic<br />

Direction 1<br />

The government will continue to support <strong>and</strong> partner with industry, providing biotechnology research that<br />

enables industry participation <strong>and</strong> helps develop <strong>and</strong> transform bio-based industries in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.<br />

The government wants to ensure that all New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s key bio-based industry sectors are receiving<br />

maximum benefit from its biotechnology research<br />

investments. This includes the primary <strong>and</strong> the<br />

food <strong>and</strong> beverage sectors. To do this effectively<br />

government, research <strong>and</strong> industry need to work<br />

closely together. This ensures that the government’s<br />

biotechnology research investments are taken up by<br />

industry where it exists, <strong>and</strong> the resulting products are<br />

acceptable to <strong>and</strong> valued by global markets.<br />

Investing in higher risk, science-led research which<br />

extends the horizons of industry <strong>and</strong> provides the<br />

engine for a transformed future economy <strong>and</strong> new<br />

industries is another important role for government<br />

funded R&D.<br />

Achieving this range of outcomes requires public<br />

investment to retain a balanced portfolio of applied<br />

research that maintains <strong>and</strong> extends New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s<br />

comparative industry advantages <strong>and</strong> excellence<br />

focused earlier stage research with the potential for<br />

more transformational outcomes.<br />

Different outcomes require different approaches<br />

to setting research direction. For applied research<br />

investments, research <strong>and</strong> investment agencies need to<br />

set research directions <strong>and</strong> targets in partnership with<br />

industry. From this comes an expectation that research<br />

proposals supporting industry development will also<br />

be assessed on their connections with end-user groups<br />

both through the setting of research targets <strong>and</strong>/or cofunding<br />

commitments. The rationale for this approach<br />

is to actively involve industry end-users in the process<br />

so there will be more likelihood they will gain direct<br />

benefits from the research.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> priorities for earlier-stage biotechnology<br />

research with the potential to build new industry <strong>and</strong><br />

transform existing industry need to be primarily based<br />

on internationally competitive research excellence.<br />

However, the government also recognises that a<br />

greater degree of flexibility needs to be built into<br />

the research prioritisation <strong>and</strong> assessment process as<br />

research opportunities transition from early stage to<br />

more applied. This is because different industry groups<br />

may be at differing levels of maturity in terms of their<br />

capacity to co-invest, or in their own ability to take<br />

up <strong>and</strong> progress the results of research (for instance,<br />

research may be needed to prove to industry the value<br />

of “new animals” or “new crops”). FRST have started<br />

to build this increased flexibility into their investment<br />

processes as part of a “sector development” initiative. 79<br />

The government also has an important role to play in<br />

stimulating private sector investment in biotechnology<br />

R&D. Public-private research co-investment schemes<br />

act as an incentive to achieve this. Co-investment<br />

schemes also build important linkages between<br />

research <strong>and</strong> industry.<br />

Although the <strong>Research</strong> Consortia scheme has<br />

improved links between research <strong>and</strong> industry,<br />

a consistent theme in this <strong>Roadmap</strong> is that, in<br />

reality, one size does not fit all across all industries.<br />

Fragmented, heterogeneous industry sectors do not<br />

currently absorb <strong>and</strong> benefit from biotechnology<br />

research as well as centralised, vertically integrated<br />

industry sectors. Notable examples of fragmented<br />

sectors identified in this <strong>Roadmap</strong> are the marine <strong>and</strong><br />

food <strong>and</strong> beverage sectors (see Direction 2 below).<br />

The Seafood <strong>Innovation</strong> Ltd research consortium, in<br />

part due to sector diversity, has been predicated on a<br />

different co-investment model than the other research<br />

consortia.<br />

The government will continue investing in publicprivate<br />

co-funding partnerships with industry. It will<br />

also continue working to ensure the most effective<br />

models are adopted to support different types of<br />

industry groupings.<br />

79<br />

FRST (2006), Investment Signals for the Leveraging New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s Natural Resources Investment Process 2006-2007, p.19-20<br />

52 <strong>Roadmap</strong>s for <strong>Science</strong> : biotechnology research

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!