Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation
Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation
Biotechnology Research Roadmap - Science and Innovation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.2.1 Directions: Economic<br />
Direction 1<br />
The government will continue to support <strong>and</strong> partner with industry, providing biotechnology research that<br />
enables industry participation <strong>and</strong> helps develop <strong>and</strong> transform bio-based industries in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.<br />
The government wants to ensure that all New<br />
Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s key bio-based industry sectors are receiving<br />
maximum benefit from its biotechnology research<br />
investments. This includes the primary <strong>and</strong> the<br />
food <strong>and</strong> beverage sectors. To do this effectively<br />
government, research <strong>and</strong> industry need to work<br />
closely together. This ensures that the government’s<br />
biotechnology research investments are taken up by<br />
industry where it exists, <strong>and</strong> the resulting products are<br />
acceptable to <strong>and</strong> valued by global markets.<br />
Investing in higher risk, science-led research which<br />
extends the horizons of industry <strong>and</strong> provides the<br />
engine for a transformed future economy <strong>and</strong> new<br />
industries is another important role for government<br />
funded R&D.<br />
Achieving this range of outcomes requires public<br />
investment to retain a balanced portfolio of applied<br />
research that maintains <strong>and</strong> extends New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
comparative industry advantages <strong>and</strong> excellence<br />
focused earlier stage research with the potential for<br />
more transformational outcomes.<br />
Different outcomes require different approaches<br />
to setting research direction. For applied research<br />
investments, research <strong>and</strong> investment agencies need to<br />
set research directions <strong>and</strong> targets in partnership with<br />
industry. From this comes an expectation that research<br />
proposals supporting industry development will also<br />
be assessed on their connections with end-user groups<br />
both through the setting of research targets <strong>and</strong>/or cofunding<br />
commitments. The rationale for this approach<br />
is to actively involve industry end-users in the process<br />
so there will be more likelihood they will gain direct<br />
benefits from the research.<br />
<strong>Research</strong> priorities for earlier-stage biotechnology<br />
research with the potential to build new industry <strong>and</strong><br />
transform existing industry need to be primarily based<br />
on internationally competitive research excellence.<br />
However, the government also recognises that a<br />
greater degree of flexibility needs to be built into<br />
the research prioritisation <strong>and</strong> assessment process as<br />
research opportunities transition from early stage to<br />
more applied. This is because different industry groups<br />
may be at differing levels of maturity in terms of their<br />
capacity to co-invest, or in their own ability to take<br />
up <strong>and</strong> progress the results of research (for instance,<br />
research may be needed to prove to industry the value<br />
of “new animals” or “new crops”). FRST have started<br />
to build this increased flexibility into their investment<br />
processes as part of a “sector development” initiative. 79<br />
The government also has an important role to play in<br />
stimulating private sector investment in biotechnology<br />
R&D. Public-private research co-investment schemes<br />
act as an incentive to achieve this. Co-investment<br />
schemes also build important linkages between<br />
research <strong>and</strong> industry.<br />
Although the <strong>Research</strong> Consortia scheme has<br />
improved links between research <strong>and</strong> industry,<br />
a consistent theme in this <strong>Roadmap</strong> is that, in<br />
reality, one size does not fit all across all industries.<br />
Fragmented, heterogeneous industry sectors do not<br />
currently absorb <strong>and</strong> benefit from biotechnology<br />
research as well as centralised, vertically integrated<br />
industry sectors. Notable examples of fragmented<br />
sectors identified in this <strong>Roadmap</strong> are the marine <strong>and</strong><br />
food <strong>and</strong> beverage sectors (see Direction 2 below).<br />
The Seafood <strong>Innovation</strong> Ltd research consortium, in<br />
part due to sector diversity, has been predicated on a<br />
different co-investment model than the other research<br />
consortia.<br />
The government will continue investing in publicprivate<br />
co-funding partnerships with industry. It will<br />
also continue working to ensure the most effective<br />
models are adopted to support different types of<br />
industry groupings.<br />
79<br />
FRST (2006), Investment Signals for the Leveraging New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s Natural Resources Investment Process 2006-2007, p.19-20<br />
52 <strong>Roadmap</strong>s for <strong>Science</strong> : biotechnology research