07.02.2015 Views

For healthy potatoes - Bayer CropScience

For healthy potatoes - Bayer CropScience

For healthy potatoes - Bayer CropScience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ment. This can only occur if the recommended<br />

(and registered) rate is applied<br />

accurately. Careful calibration, maintenance<br />

and operation of the seed-treatment<br />

equipment are essential for achieving this;<br />

but other factors also play a major role,<br />

including the physico-chemical properties<br />

of the product; and the technical purity of<br />

the seed lot. The same parameters also<br />

determine how evenly the seed-treatment<br />

product is applied across the individual<br />

seeds. It is often possible to trace back a<br />

particular distribution pattern of a product<br />

to a particular combination of personnel<br />

and equipment. Graphical representation<br />

of the measured coverage of hundreds of<br />

individual seeds shows that a certain proportion<br />

of seeds always receives either significantly<br />

more, or significantly less than<br />

the target amount. This means that under<br />

practical conditions, every seed lot<br />

inevitably contains a certain number of<br />

over- or under-treated seeds. Even though<br />

the safety margin that has been incorporated<br />

into a product’s recommended application<br />

rate means that problems rarely<br />

arise in a crop grown from unevenlytreated<br />

seed, the consequences of intentional<br />

under-treating of seeds are often<br />

underestimated.<br />

Seed-treatment – an insurance<br />

policy for the farmer<br />

The pressure to continually decrease costs<br />

in cereal production has led to a situation<br />

in which various types of seed-treatment<br />

product are available that differ not only in<br />

terms of price, but also in terms of spectrum-of-action.<br />

This necessitates careful<br />

cost-benefit analysis: using a product containing<br />

a single active substance – and thus<br />

with a limited spectrum-of-action – is<br />

probably appropriate for (apparently) noninfected<br />

or only slightly-infected seeds<br />

lots, although the risk remains difficult to<br />

calculate. These products lack the versatility<br />

of premium products, which tend to<br />

maintain their broad activity even if unforeseen<br />

bad weather occurs, or if the risk<br />

of infection is higher than anticipated. The<br />

potential for efficacy offered by broadspectrum<br />

products under problematic conditions<br />

represents a cost-benefit investment<br />

that is probably unmatched by any<br />

other crop protection measure.<br />

Seed treatment should therefore not<br />

only be judged on the basis of cost. It<br />

should also be considered as an insurance<br />

policy, and this is reflected in the higher<br />

price paid for treated seed.<br />

Achieving an optimal seed-treatment<br />

that supports effective cereal cultivation<br />

depends on the use of high-quality products:<br />

these must show a spectrum-of-action<br />

and technical properties that meet the most<br />

demanding modern standards. ■<br />

Distribution of seed-treatment product across 100 seeds with 100% application rate<br />

Number of seeds<br />

Distribution of seed-treatment product across 100 seeds with 80% application rate<br />

Number of seeds<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1 2 5 4<br />

5<br />

1 2 5 4<br />

5<br />

9<br />

22<br />

10<br />

6<br />

9<br />

11<br />

22<br />

4<br />

10<br />

35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 160<br />

Coverage (%)<br />

7<br />

Fritz Brendler,<br />

Chamber of Agriculture, North Rhine-Westphalia,<br />

Crop protection service Bonn, Germany<br />

6<br />

4 3<br />

2<br />

35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 160<br />

Coverage (%)<br />

11<br />

4<br />

7<br />

3<br />

4 3<br />

2<br />

acceptable limits<br />

unacceptable limits<br />

3<br />

acceptable limits<br />

unacceptable limits<br />

1 1<br />

1 1<br />

In the first example, the amount of seed-treatment applied corresponded to 100%<br />

of the recommended application rate. Here, 78% of seeds had a coverage that was<br />

within acceptable limits (the region between 80 and 120 % coverage, blue bars).<br />

In the second example, only 80% of the recommended application rate was applied.<br />

The result: the proportion of seeds receiving coverage within the acceptable limits was<br />

reduced almost by half, to 40%. Coverage was too low for the majority (58%) of seeds.<br />

2/06 COURIER 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!