06.02.2015 Views

US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

29<br />

were lifted by 5 percent; and additional bank loans are to be directed<br />

toward small- and medium-sized businesses and agriculture. 23<br />

The RMB undervaluation also limits the policy options of other<br />

countries—notably countries like Taiwan, Japan, and Malaysia<br />

that compete with <strong>China</strong> for export markets and do not want to see<br />

their exchange rates appreciate relative to the RMB. A coordinated<br />

appreciation of Asian currencies might be the only option, as no<br />

Asian country wants its currency to appreciate too much relative<br />

to the others for fear of being priced out of the global market by<br />

<strong>China</strong>’s products. <strong>China</strong>’s undervaluation, then, spurs other nations<br />

in the region to ensure artificially that their currencies remain undervalued,<br />

and the ultimate result is that the entire Asian region<br />

realizes large trade surpluses. This necessarily means other regions<br />

will have large trade deficits, inhibiting global adjustment.<br />

The economic impacts of <strong>China</strong>’s currency undervaluation and<br />

the concern about their effects on the global economy have not<br />

prompted the IMF to depart from its long-standing conclusion on<br />

the issue. In its half-yearly World Economic Outlook 2008 report,<br />

the IMF said the RMB ‘‘remains substantially undervalued,’’ an understated<br />

conclusion compared to a determination that the RMB is<br />

‘‘fundamentally misaligned.’’ 24 The latter conclusion would have indicated<br />

that <strong>China</strong> does not conform to guidelines prohibiting members<br />

from valuing their currency in a way that creates international<br />

instability and gives an unfair competitive advantage to<br />

its exporters, which would trigger significant IMF pressure on<br />

<strong>China</strong> to change its currency policy.* 25<br />

In August 2008, the People’s Bank of <strong>China</strong> launched a new exchange<br />

rate department. 26 This may indicate that <strong>China</strong> now sees<br />

the RMB exchange rate as a more important monetary policy instrument.<br />

27 In the first half of 2008, for example, the People’s<br />

Bank of <strong>China</strong> allowed the RMB to appreciate in order to stem inflation,<br />

but later, as the global economic situation began to deteriorate,<br />

it stopped the appreciation to boost exports. According to the<br />

bank’s statement issued at that time, the new department’s objectives<br />

will be tracking the foreign exchange market, implementing<br />

currency policy, formulating and implementing foreign exchange<br />

market regulations and controls, adjusting and controlling supply<br />

and demand in the domestic foreign exchange market, and seeking<br />

to create an offshore market for the RMB, in tandem with the process<br />

of internationalizing the RMB. 28<br />

An exchange rate office currently operates under the Monetary<br />

Policy Department of the People’s Bank of <strong>China</strong>. After the reshuffle,<br />

the new exchange rate department will absorb the office of<br />

exchange rates and office of foreign exchange transactions but also<br />

may take on the duties of ‘‘analyz[ing] and predict[ing] the changes<br />

* The administration thus far has chosen not to bring a WTO case against <strong>China</strong> on the currency<br />

issue or to bring a formal complaint to the International Monetary Fund, which has some<br />

jurisdiction over international currency matters. Nor has the U.S. Department of the Treasury<br />

in its biannual reports on global currency manipulation been willing to cite <strong>China</strong> for that transgression.<br />

The administration has justified its decision not to cite <strong>China</strong> by pointing, in the 1988<br />

law that requires the report, to a provision stating that a country can be cited only if it has<br />

deliberately manipulated its currency value to gain an export advantage. The administration argues<br />

that it cannot discern Chinese leaders’ intent and therefore cannot cite <strong>China</strong> for currency<br />

manipulation. See U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee<br />

on Trade, testimony of Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Mark Sobel, May 9,<br />

2007. The 1988 law is The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!