US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

176
112. Reinhard Drifte, ‘‘Japanese-Chinese territorial disputes in the East China
Sea—between military confrontation and economic cooperation,’’ Working paper,
Asia Research Centre (London School of Economics and Political Science, London,
UK: August 2008). http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/asiaResearchCentre/pdf/Working
Paper/ARCWorkingPaper24Drifte2008.pdf.
113. Reinhard Drifte, ‘‘Japanese-Chinese territorial disputes in the East China
Sea—between military confrontation and economic cooperation,’’ Working paper,
Asia Research Centre (London School of Economics and Political Science, London,
UK: August 2008). http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/asiaResearchCentre/pdf/Working
Paper/ARCWorkingPaper24Drifte2008.pdf.
114. Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China, ‘‘CNOOC Pledges to
Share Investment, Risk with Japan on Joint Development of East China Sea,’’ June
27, 2008. http://win.mofcom.gov.cn/en/topics/topicldetail.aspid=4324.
115. CIA [Central Intelligence Agency] World Factbook, ‘‘Paracel Islands.’’ https://
www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pf.html. Last updated on
October 23, 2008.
116. CIA World Factbook, ‘‘Spratly Islands.’’ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pg.
html. Last updated on October 23, 2008.
117. U.S. Institute of Peace, ‘‘The South China Sea Dispute: Prospects for Preventive
Diplomacy,’’ Special Report no. 18, August 1996. http://www.usip.org/pubs/
specialreports/early/snyder/SouthlChinalSea1.html.
118. ‘‘Whale and Spratlys,’’ Economist, December 13, 2007. http://www.economist.
com/world/asia/displaystory.cfmstorylid=10286863; CIA World Factbook, ‘‘Spratly
Islands.’’ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pg.html.
119. Cai Fengzhen et al., Kongtian Yiti Zuozhan Xue [Integrated Aerospace Operations]
(PLA Press, Beijing: 2006), pp. 90–91.
120. Baker Spring, ‘‘An Inchoate Process for the International Regulation of Military
Activities in Space,’’ Space and Defense, Fall 2006, 7.
121. Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration
and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, U.S. Department
of State, Signed at Washington, London, and Moscow on January 27,
1967. http://www.state.gov/t/ac/trt/5181.htm#signatory.
122. Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration
and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, U.S. Department
of State, Signed at Washington, London, and Moscow on January 27,
1967. http://www.state.gov/t/ac/trt/5181.htm#signatory.
123. John Sheldon et al., ‘‘Forum on National Security Space: Space Issues in
2007,’’ Washington Roundtable on Science & Public Policy (George Marshall Institute,
Washington, DC: January 22, 2007), p. 14.
124. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s
Views of Sovereignty and Methods of Access Control, testimony of Philip Meek, February
27, 2008.
125. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s
Views of Sovereignty and Methods of Access Control, testimony of Philip Meek, February
27, 2008.
126. Ren Xiaofeng, ‘‘Zhuanyu jingjiqu Junshi Liyong de Falu Wenti: Zhongguode
Guanjiao’’ [Legal Issues Regarding Military and Intelligence Gathering Activities in
the EEZ and Adjacent Airspace: A Chinese Perspective]. Chinalawinfo.com.
127. Statement by the Chinese Delegation at the Thematic Debate on Outer
Space at the First Committee of the 62nd Session of the UNGA (New York, October
22, 2007. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceun/eng/xw/t374868.htm. Statement by H.E.
Ambassador Hu Xiaodai at the Plenary of the 2003 Session of the Conference on
Disarmament on PAROS. Geneva, July 31, 2003. http://www.nti.org/db/china/
chindocs/huxiaodil073103.htm. The PAROS initiative is a response by some countries
to the fact that there is no multilateral agreement banning the deployment of
weapons (except WMD [weapons of mass destruction] in the Outer Space Treaty)
in outer space. The initial goals of member states to the PAROS initiative are confidence-building
and transparency measures.
128. Statement by Head of Chinese Delegation Ambassador Hu Xiaodi at the
Thematic Debate of 1st Committee of UNGA 60th Session on Outer Space, October
12, 2005. http://www.china-un.org/eng/xnyfgk/t216359.htm.
129. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s
Views of Sovereignty and Methods of Access Control, testimony of Philip Meek, February
27, 2008.
130. Chen Qiang, Chinese Practice in Public International Law, Chinese Journal
of International Law, 3, 2003, 17–28.
131. U.S. Department of Defense, Annual Report to Congress on the Military
Power of the People’s Republic of China (Washington, DC: March 2008), pp. 18–21.