06.02.2015 Views

US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118<br />

302. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, written testimony of Charles McMillion, July 16, 2008.<br />

303. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Ernest H. Preeg, July 16, 2008.<br />

304. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), ‘‘OECD<br />

Reviews of Innovation Policy: <strong>China</strong> Synthesis <strong>Report</strong>,’’ September 2007, p. 14, chart<br />

1.15. http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3343,enl2649l201185l39160380l1l1l<br />

1l1,00.html.<br />

305. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Kathleen Walsh, July 16, 2008.<br />

306. Ernest H. Preeg, India and <strong>China</strong>; An Advanced Technology Race and How<br />

the United States Should Respond (Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, Arlington, Virginia:<br />

2008), p. 11.<br />

307. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Kent Hughes, July 16, 2008.<br />

308. Alan William Wolff, ‘‘<strong>China</strong>’s Drive Toward Innovation,’’ Issues in Science<br />

and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, Spring 2007.<br />

309. World Trade Organization, ‘‘Accession of the People’s Republic of <strong>China</strong>’’ (Geneva,<br />

Switzerland: November 23, 2001), p. 5.<br />

310. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Kathleen Walsh, July 16, 2008.<br />

311. Some of the result of <strong>China</strong>’s currency policy also can be seen in the trade<br />

surplus in the manufacturing sector, which rose from $45 billion in 2000 to $465<br />

billion in 2007 and was up 32 percent in the first five months of 2008 compared<br />

with the same period in 2007. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>,<br />

Hearing on Research and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries,<br />

and Changing Trade Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Ernest H. Preeg, July<br />

16, 2008.<br />

312. Stephen J. Ezell and Robert Atkinson, ‘‘RAND’s Rose Colored Glasses: How<br />

RAND’s <strong>Report</strong> on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong,’’<br />

The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (Washington, DC: August<br />

2008), p. 8.<br />

313. Stephen J. Ezell and Robert Atkinson, ‘‘RAND’s Rose Colored Glasses: How<br />

RAND’s <strong>Report</strong> on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong,’’<br />

The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (Washington, DC: August<br />

2008), p. 8.<br />

314. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Qingjiu Tao, July 16, 2008.<br />

315. globalEDGE, ‘‘Aerospace and Defense Trade Statistics’’ (Michigan State University,<br />

2005). http://globaledge.msu.edu/industries/tradeInfo.aspSortBy=&Industry<br />

ID=42&View=&sector=8800.<br />

316. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />

and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />

Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Charles McMillion, July 16, 2008.<br />

317. globalEDGE, ‘‘Technology Industry Trade Statistics’’ (Michigan State University:<br />

2005). http://globaledge.msu.edu/industries/tradeInfo.aspindustryID=35.<br />

318. Titus Galama and James Hosek, ‘‘U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology’’<br />

(National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC:<br />

2008), p. xvi.<br />

319. Titus Galama and James Hosek, ‘‘U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology’’<br />

(National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC:<br />

2008), p. xxi.<br />

320. Titus Galama and James Hosek, ‘‘U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology’’<br />

(National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC:<br />

2008), p. xxiii.<br />

321. The ITIF is a two-year-old, Washington-based nonprofit educational 501(c)(3)<br />

foundation promoting advanced technological innovation.<br />

322. Stephen J. Ezell and Robert Atkinson, ‘‘RAND’s Rose Colored Glasses: How<br />

RAND’s <strong>Report</strong> on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong’’<br />

(The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC: August<br />

2008), p. 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!