US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error
US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error
US-China Commission Report - Fatal System Error
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
118<br />
302. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, written testimony of Charles McMillion, July 16, 2008.<br />
303. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Ernest H. Preeg, July 16, 2008.<br />
304. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), ‘‘OECD<br />
Reviews of Innovation Policy: <strong>China</strong> Synthesis <strong>Report</strong>,’’ September 2007, p. 14, chart<br />
1.15. http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3343,enl2649l201185l39160380l1l1l<br />
1l1,00.html.<br />
305. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Kathleen Walsh, July 16, 2008.<br />
306. Ernest H. Preeg, India and <strong>China</strong>; An Advanced Technology Race and How<br />
the United States Should Respond (Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI, Arlington, Virginia:<br />
2008), p. 11.<br />
307. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Kent Hughes, July 16, 2008.<br />
308. Alan William Wolff, ‘‘<strong>China</strong>’s Drive Toward Innovation,’’ Issues in Science<br />
and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, Spring 2007.<br />
309. World Trade Organization, ‘‘Accession of the People’s Republic of <strong>China</strong>’’ (Geneva,<br />
Switzerland: November 23, 2001), p. 5.<br />
310. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Kathleen Walsh, July 16, 2008.<br />
311. Some of the result of <strong>China</strong>’s currency policy also can be seen in the trade<br />
surplus in the manufacturing sector, which rose from $45 billion in 2000 to $465<br />
billion in 2007 and was up 32 percent in the first five months of 2008 compared<br />
with the same period in 2007. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>,<br />
Hearing on Research and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries,<br />
and Changing Trade Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Ernest H. Preeg, July<br />
16, 2008.<br />
312. Stephen J. Ezell and Robert Atkinson, ‘‘RAND’s Rose Colored Glasses: How<br />
RAND’s <strong>Report</strong> on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong,’’<br />
The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (Washington, DC: August<br />
2008), p. 8.<br />
313. Stephen J. Ezell and Robert Atkinson, ‘‘RAND’s Rose Colored Glasses: How<br />
RAND’s <strong>Report</strong> on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong,’’<br />
The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (Washington, DC: August<br />
2008), p. 8.<br />
314. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Qingjiu Tao, July 16, 2008.<br />
315. globalEDGE, ‘‘Aerospace and Defense Trade Statistics’’ (Michigan State University,<br />
2005). http://globaledge.msu.edu/industries/tradeInfo.aspSortBy=&Industry<br />
ID=42&View=§or=8800.<br />
316. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Economic and Security Review <strong>Commission</strong>, Hearing on Research<br />
and Development, Technological Advances in Key Industries, and Changing Trade<br />
Flows with <strong>China</strong>, testimony of Charles McMillion, July 16, 2008.<br />
317. globalEDGE, ‘‘Technology Industry Trade Statistics’’ (Michigan State University:<br />
2005). http://globaledge.msu.edu/industries/tradeInfo.aspindustryID=35.<br />
318. Titus Galama and James Hosek, ‘‘U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology’’<br />
(National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC:<br />
2008), p. xvi.<br />
319. Titus Galama and James Hosek, ‘‘U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology’’<br />
(National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC:<br />
2008), p. xxi.<br />
320. Titus Galama and James Hosek, ‘‘U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology’’<br />
(National Defense Research Institute, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC:<br />
2008), p. xxiii.<br />
321. The ITIF is a two-year-old, Washington-based nonprofit educational 501(c)(3)<br />
foundation promoting advanced technological innovation.<br />
322. Stephen J. Ezell and Robert Atkinson, ‘‘RAND’s Rose Colored Glasses: How<br />
RAND’s <strong>Report</strong> on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong’’<br />
(The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC: August<br />
2008), p. 10.