04.02.2015 Views

Right of free movement for EU citizenship.pdf - Andreas Neocleous ...

Right of free movement for EU citizenship.pdf - Andreas Neocleous ...

Right of free movement for EU citizenship.pdf - Andreas Neocleous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Can the right <strong>of</strong> <strong>free</strong> <strong>movement</strong> deriving from Union <strong>citizenship</strong> be<br />

invoked by <strong>EU</strong> citizens in order to regularise the residence <strong>of</strong> their<br />

non-<strong>EU</strong> spouse<br />

Under <strong>EU</strong> law, when a national <strong>of</strong> a Member State resides legally in another<br />

Member State, his or her spouse is allowed to remain with him or her even when<br />

the spouse is not a national <strong>of</strong> an <strong>EU</strong> Member State.<br />

In a case referred to it by the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> the United Kingdom, the<br />

European Court recently decided that a national <strong>of</strong> a Member State who had<br />

never made use <strong>of</strong> her right <strong>of</strong> <strong>free</strong> <strong>movement</strong> and had always resided in the<br />

Member State <strong>of</strong> her nationality has no right to invoke the rules <strong>of</strong> <strong>EU</strong> law<br />

designed to facilitate the <strong>movement</strong> <strong>of</strong> persons within the territory <strong>of</strong> the Member<br />

States. In its judgment, the European Court stated that Directive 2004/38, which<br />

relates to the right <strong>of</strong> <strong>free</strong> <strong>movement</strong> <strong>of</strong> persons, determines the way in which<br />

European citizens can exercise their right to <strong>free</strong>dom <strong>of</strong> <strong>movement</strong> within the<br />

territory <strong>of</strong> the Member States and the conditions attaching to the exercise <strong>of</strong> that<br />

right. It regulates the rules governing an individual's right to travel and reside<br />

within Member States other than that <strong>of</strong> which he or she is a national, not his or<br />

her Member State <strong>of</strong> nationality.<br />

According to the international law principle reaffirmed in the European<br />

Convention on Human <strong>Right</strong>s and Fundamental Freedoms signed in Rome on 4<br />

November 1950, <strong>EU</strong> citizens residing in the Member State <strong>of</strong> which they are<br />

nationals enjoy the unconditional right <strong>of</strong> residence in that State. The fact that<br />

an individual is a national <strong>of</strong> more than one Member State does not mean that he<br />

or she has already used the right <strong>of</strong> <strong>free</strong> <strong>movement</strong>. Dual nationality does not<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer an automatic right to benefit from the <strong>free</strong>dom <strong>of</strong> <strong>movement</strong> and the rights<br />

conferred by the directive.<br />

In its decision the European Court notes that a person who is national <strong>of</strong> at least<br />

one Member State enjoys the status <strong>of</strong> <strong>EU</strong> citizen and may there<strong>for</strong>e rely on the<br />

rights pertaining to that status and, in particular, the right to move and reside<br />

within the territory <strong>of</strong> the Member States. However, if the individual does not<br />

exercise this right, his or her non-European spouse is not automatically entitled<br />

to the same benefit.<br />

According to the European Court’s ruling, this situation has no connection with<br />

European Union law but is covered exclusively by national law. Under these<br />

circumstances, the right <strong>of</strong> residence in a Member State cannot be based on the<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> European <strong>citizenship</strong>.<br />

The applicability <strong>of</strong> Directive 2004/38<br />

According to article 3(1) <strong>of</strong> Directive 2004/38 all <strong>EU</strong> citizens who move to or<br />

reside in an <strong>EU</strong> Member State other than that <strong>of</strong> which they are a national are


eneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the Directive. The Directive does not set out in detail the<br />

conditions governing the exercise <strong>of</strong> this right.<br />

The provisions <strong>of</strong> article 21 TF<strong>EU</strong> governing <strong>free</strong>dom <strong>of</strong> <strong>movement</strong> <strong>for</strong> persons<br />

and the measures adopted to implement them cannot be applied to situations<br />

which have no factor linking them with any <strong>of</strong> the situations governed by <strong>EU</strong> law<br />

and which are confined in all relevant respects within a single Member State.<br />

The European Court has already stated several times its view that <strong>citizenship</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the European Union is the fundamental status <strong>of</strong> nationals <strong>of</strong> its Member States.<br />

A national <strong>of</strong> at least one Member State enjoys the status <strong>of</strong> a Union citizen under<br />

article 20(1) TF<strong>EU</strong> and may, there<strong>for</strong>e, rely on the rights pertaining to that status,<br />

including the right to move and reside <strong>free</strong>ly within the territory <strong>of</strong> the Member<br />

States. However, if there is no element indicating that the national measure at<br />

issue in the main proceedings has the effect <strong>of</strong> depriving an individual <strong>of</strong> that<br />

right, the article is not applicable.<br />

The right to transfer the benefits <strong>of</strong> Union <strong>citizenship</strong> to a non-<strong>EU</strong> Member State<br />

spouse must be applied within the Member State <strong>of</strong> which the Union citizen is<br />

both a national and a resident.<br />

Author:<br />

Law Firm:<br />

Website:<br />

Christos Floridis<br />

<strong>Andreas</strong> <strong>Neocleous</strong> & Co LLC<br />

www.neocleous.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!