04.02.2015 Views

Cyprus - Andreas Neocleous & Co

Cyprus - Andreas Neocleous & Co

Cyprus - Andreas Neocleous & Co

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CYP/14<br />

INTERNATIONAL AGENCY AND DISTRIBUTION LAW<br />

The agent is still entitled to his commission if the principal contracts at a lower<br />

price or on terms other than those the agent was authorized to offer, provided<br />

that the contract as finally concluded is merely a different way of carrying out<br />

the same contract the agent was employed to arrange.<br />

However, in such a case the terms of the agency contract will be strictly<br />

scrutinized to ascertain whether the agent was the effective cause. In Socrates<br />

Eliades v Pantelis Petrides, 19 it was held that contracts under which a principal is<br />

bound to pay commission for an introduction which does not result in a sale must<br />

be expressed in clear language.<br />

An agent is entitled to remuneration for his services as agent, if either the<br />

express or implied terms of any agency contract so provide. Where the contract<br />

contains express terms, the agent cannot claim remuneration other than in<br />

accordance with those terms.<br />

In the absence of express terms, the right to claim any remuneration and the<br />

amount and terms of payment are determined by such terms as may be implied.<br />

In deciding what terms are to be implied the court must consider:<br />

• All the circumstances of the case;<br />

• The nature and duration of the services;<br />

• The express terms of the contract; and<br />

• The customs and usage of the particular trade. 20<br />

In the absence of any factors to the contrary, a term will be implied to hold that<br />

the agent is entitled to reasonable remuneration.<br />

These principles were applied in the following cases:<br />

• JF Aho Et Fils Trading Under the Style Societe BEPIN and Another v Photos<br />

Photiades & <strong>Co</strong>;<br />

• Orphanides v Michaelides; and<br />

• Ioannis Patsalides v Georghios Th. Takkas.<br />

In JF Aho Et Fils Trading Under the Style Societe BEPIN and Another v Photos<br />

Photiades & <strong>Co</strong>, 21 the court held that the contract should be interpreted and<br />

applied as if the parties had made it, if made at all, and the court should not<br />

tailor the contract for the parties or reconstruct an agreement on equitable<br />

principles.<br />

Where the agent is to be remunerated on the happening of an event, the question<br />

whether that event has occurred depends on the facts of the case and the express<br />

or implied terms of the agency contract.<br />

19 Socrates Eliades v Pantelis Petrides (1972) 1 CLR 5.<br />

20 Read v Rann, 1830, 10 B&C 438.<br />

21 Civil Appeal Number 4704-1968.<br />

(Release 2 – 2013)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!