a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua

a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua

historiantigua.cl
from historiantigua.cl More from this publisher
04.02.2015 Views

-451- 8: 4 coins, burnooses, copper pots and kettles, brass basins, looking glasses, swords, guns and pistols, powder, tools, horses. From the Sudan/Fezzan to Tripoli were carried slaves, gold and ivory on a very small scale, various types of cottons and garments, leather as hides and manufactured articles, water skins, ostrich skins and feathers, wooden bowls and mortars, honey, civet, pepper, kola nuts. 9. The most important recent discussions of the trade are Bovill 1968, 6-40; Law 1967,181-200; Daniels 1970a, 42-44. 10. Pliny NH, V, 37; XXXVII, 92-93, XXXVII, 104; 175, on the cornelian which clearly originated in the Syrtic desert hinterland (Nasamonitis) or in the Garamantian lands. Pliny (XXXIII, 111) also mentioned Garamantian palms so it is possible that dates were exported on a minor scale. 11. This part of the myth originated with Duveyrier, see Monod 1974,51-66. 12. Daniels pers. comm. and note 9 above. 13. See Ayoub 1967a, 16-20, for a reference to finds of gold, semi- precious stones (including cornelian), ivory, ostrich egg shell, silver bracelet, fragments of bronze and brass, coins, sea shell vessels, glass and fine pottery. Also 1968a, 41-53,77-81; Daniels 1971a, 261-85; 1973,39-40; 1977,5-7. 14. See above, 6: 2. Also see now Tagart 1983,143-54. 15. Daniels 1973,37. 16. Compare the far less fragile items involved in the later trade, note 8 above. 17. Herodotus IV, 183; the presence of negro slaves is attested in the Roman world, but their numbers are difficult to assess, Law 1967,195; Desanges 1976,121-34. 18. Lyon 1821,66. 19. As note 13 above. 20. Monod 1974,51-66 and note 10 above. 21. Pliny, NH, V, 26; other references to elephants north of the Sahara are V, 5; V, 18; VIII, 1; 4; 15; 18; 24-26; 31; XI, 32. 22. Desanges 1964,713-25. 23. A model elephant was erected by the main street in Lepcis (pers. obs. ) and the office of the Sabrathan merchants in Ostia's "Piazzale delle Corporazioni" was fronted by a mosaic of an elephant, Romanelli 1960, 63-72. 24. IRT 231 (Oea), 295 (Lepcis). See further Aurigemma 1940a, 67-86; Romanelli 1920,376-83. 25. Daniels 1969,48-51. Natron is an important raw material in glass making. 26. See above 6: 1 and Daniels 1971a, 281-85. 27. Rebuffat 1979,232; 1982a, 502-06; 1982c, 196; Marichal 1979,451. 28. Rebuffat 1982a, 502-06. 29. Rebuffat 1979,232; cf. Cagnat 1914a, 142-46; Darwin 1964,7-23, Fentress 1979,183-84, on the Zarai tariff. It is normally assumed that all customs dues were collected by the procuratorial staff in the provinces. This seems unlikely with regard to customs control in the militarised zone. The significance of Zarai is that it passed into civil control after the frontier had been moved forward and the garrison withdrawn. 30. Cf. Fentress 1979,182-86; Barker 1981,131-45; 1982,2-8; 1983,1-49. 31. Bovill 1968,6-12. 32. The size of wild beast shows, particularly in Rome, suggests that the market may have been very lucrative. The scale seems to have escalated: Caesar put 400 lions against gladiators in a single day; Augustus had 3,500 animals slaughtered in 26 shows: Titus opened the Colosseum with the lengthy slaughter of 9,000 animals, under Trajan 2,246 beasts were killed in a single day (Bovill 1968,6-7).

-452- 8: 4 33. See the classic accounts of Jones 1964,841-45; Finley 1973,126-27, on the transportation of cereals. 34. Finley 1973, remains of fundamental value as a sober analysis based mainly on the literary evidence. See also Polanyi et al 1957; Hodder 1979. 35. Jones 1964,241-42; Lewis and Reinhold 1955,463-72. 36. Fentress . 1979,180. 37. Marichal 1979,448. These 16 urnae (apparently containing oil) had a total capacity of 210 litres which was four times the Tripolitanian standard unit of 52.5 litres. Each urna, therefore, contained 1/4 of the standard unit or 13.125 litres. 38. As note 37. A donkey could carry 6 urnae or 11 units of 52.5 litres. 39. Particularly in the pre-desert, wagon and cart transport will have been rather impractical because of the roughness of the terrain, it was also more expensive than camel and donkey transportation. 40. Apuleius, Apol. XLIV, 6. 41. See above 8: 2 note 20. Most of these production and transportation payments will have been made in kind rather than cash in any case. In an economic system where so many of the production costs are invisible or not equateable with the eventual cash value of the product, one might expect a high proportion of the cash profit to be converted into consumer or luxury goods in the Roman market system. 42. All things being equal, if the balance was disturbed by warfare or by a decline in the cash markets and the volume of exports it would have become more difficult for the more remote farmers to dispose of their surpluses. 43. Marichal 1979,448, on grain supplies. (Also 8: 2, notes 25 - 26 above). On the consumption of meat by the Roman army see Davies 1971,222-48; Bowman and Thomas 1983,83-96 (the Vindolanda evidence). 44. Cf. Fentress 1979,176-82; Leschi 1947,101-04; Lequement 1980,185-93. 45. P. Kendrick and J. N. Dore pers. comms. 46. Goodchild 1949b, 39; 1951b, 96-99; Bartoccini 1929,93-95; Arthur 1982, 61-72. On Tripolitanian amphorae see Manacorda 1977,542-601; Panella 1977,135-49. 47. Pliny, NH, IX, 60; Reese 1980,79-93. 48. Pers. obs. The shells were mainly of murex branderis and murex trunculus. For the technical detail of the dye production process, see Reese 1980, 79-86. 49. Constans 1914,278-82; AE 1915,44. 50. Haynes 1959,54-55, noted the appointment of curatores rei publicae for Lepcis and Oea during the third century as a sign of financial trouble. This may have been in part occasioned by the oil dole for the city of Rome which was given by the Emporia as a form of tax from the reign of Severus, SHA, Sev, XVIII, 3; XXIII, 2. It is difficult to judge the effects of this tax which was levied intermittently until the time of Constantine. 51. This was strikingly illustrated by the recent excavations at Sidi Khrebish (Benghazi) where there was a dramatic fall in imported trade goods in post-third century levels, Lloyd (ed) 1977; 1983, and pers. comm. 52. Romanelli 1927,69-84; 1960,63-72; 1971,11-17; Manacorda 1977,542- 601, Zevi and Tchemia 1969,173-214, on the evidence from amphorae distribution.

-451-<br />

8: 4<br />

coins, burnooses, copper pots and kettles, brass basins, looking<br />

glasses, swords, guns and pistols, powder, tools, horses. From the<br />

Sudan/Fezzan to Tripoli were carried slaves, gold and ivory on a very<br />

small scale, various types <strong>of</strong> cottons and garments, leather as hides<br />

and manufactured articles, water skins, ostrich skins and feathers,<br />

wooden bowls and mortars, honey, civet, pepper, kola nuts.<br />

9. The most important recent discussions <strong>of</strong> the trade are Bovill 1968,<br />

6-40; Law 1967,181-200; Daniels 1970a, 42-44.<br />

10. Pliny NH, V, 37; XXXVII, 92-93, XXXVII, 104; 175, on the cornelian<br />

which clearly originated in the Syrtic desert hinterland (Nasamonitis)<br />

or in the Garamantian lands. Pliny (XXXIII, 111) also mentioned<br />

Garamantian palms so it is possible that dates were exported on a<br />

minor<br />

scale.<br />

11. This part <strong>of</strong> the myth originated with Duveyrier, see Monod 1974,51-66.<br />

12. Daniels pers. comm. and note 9 above.<br />

13. See Ayoub 1967a, 16-20, for a reference to finds <strong>of</strong> gold, semi-<br />

precious stones (including cornelian), ivory, ostrich egg shell,<br />

silver bracelet, fragments <strong>of</strong> bronze and brass, coins, sea shell<br />

vessels, glass and fine pottery. Also 1968a, 41-53,77-81; Daniels<br />

1971a, 261-85; 1973,39-40; 1977,5-7.<br />

14. See above, 6: 2. Also see now Tagart 1983,143-54.<br />

15. Daniels 1973,37.<br />

16. Compare the far less fragile items involved in the later trade,<br />

note<br />

8 above.<br />

17. Herodotus IV, 183; the presence <strong>of</strong> negro slaves is attested in the<br />

<strong>Roman</strong> world, but their numbers are difficult to assess, Law 1967,195;<br />

Desanges 1976,121-34.<br />

18. Lyon 1821,66.<br />

19. As note 13 above.<br />

20. Monod 1974,51-66 and note 10 above.<br />

21. Pliny, NH, V, 26; other references to elephants north <strong>of</strong> the Sahara<br />

are V, 5; V, 18; VIII, 1; 4; 15; 18; 24-26; 31; XI, 32.<br />

22. Desanges 1964,713-25.<br />

23. A model elephant was erected by the main street in Lepcis (pers. obs. )<br />

and the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the Sabrathan merchants in Ostia's "Piazzale delle<br />

Corporazioni" was fronted by a mosaic <strong>of</strong> an elephant, <strong>Roman</strong>elli 1960,<br />

63-72.<br />

24. IRT 231 (Oea), 295 (Lepcis). See further Aurigemma 1940a, 67-86;<br />

<strong>Roman</strong>elli 1920,376-83.<br />

25. Daniels 1969,48-51. Natron is an important raw material in glass<br />

making.<br />

26. See above 6: 1 and Daniels 1971a, 281-85.<br />

27. Rebuffat 1979,232; 1982a, 502-06; 1982c, 196; Marichal 1979,451.<br />

28. Rebuffat 1982a, 502-06.<br />

29. Rebuffat 1979,232; cf. Cagnat 1914a, 142-46; Darwin 1964,7-23,<br />

Fentress 1979,183-84, on the Zarai tariff. It is normally assumed<br />

that all customs dues were collected by the procuratorial staff in<br />

the <strong>province</strong>s. This seems unlikely with regard to customs control<br />

in the militarised zone. The significance <strong>of</strong> Zarai is that it passed<br />

into civil control after the <strong>frontier</strong> had been moved forward and the<br />

garrison<br />

withdrawn.<br />

30. Cf. Fentress 1979,182-86; Barker 1981,131-45; 1982,2-8; 1983,1-49.<br />

31. Bovill 1968,6-12.<br />

32. The size <strong>of</strong> wild beast shows, particularly in Rome, suggests that the<br />

market may have been very lucrative. The scale seems to have<br />

escalated: Caesar put 400 lions against gladiators in a single day;<br />

Augustus had 3,500 animals slaughtered in 26 shows: Titus opened the<br />

Colosseum with the lengthy slaughter <strong>of</strong> 9,000 animals, under Trajan<br />

2,246 beasts were killed in a single day (Bovill 1968,6-7).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!