a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua

a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua

historiantigua.cl
from historiantigua.cl More from this publisher
04.02.2015 Views

-447- 8: 1/8: 2 presses worked to full capacity for one month might produce c. 1500 hectolitres of oil. For comparison, the total oil production of Libya in 1946 was only c. 7500 hectolitres. 8: 2 The Army and the economy 1. Fentress 1979,124-87. 2. Fentress 1979,175-79. 3. The Aures plain is also prime agricultural land rather than a marginal environment like that of Tripolitania or southern Numidia. See also note 27 below. 4. The evidence for irrigation systems is too extensive for all of it to have been military in origin and one may suspect a native origin for a good deal of it, contrary to the views expressed by Baradez 1949a; Birebent 1962,487-507; Gsell et al 1902,1-143. 5. See now Shaw's fundamental study of the nundinae or rural markets in Africa, 1981a, 37-83. 6. On the Roman economy, see Finley 1973 and Hopkins 1978. On the economy of Roman Africa, Gsell HAAN I, 1-176 and Haywood 1938,3-119, are still fundamental for their discussion of the primary sources. 7. O'Leary 1982, was a slightly misguided attempt to identify either a "primate" or "dendritic" market system in Tripolitania using an inadeq- uate data base. The methodologies, however, should prove of great value in future work. 8. Manning 1975,112-16; Bowman and Thomas 1983,83-96; Rebuffat 1982a, 505-06. 9. Manning 1975,112-14; to some extent the speed of economic development may have conditioned the advance and development of frontiers. 10. See above 7: 3. 11. There are good parallels for this sort of economic development in modern colonial situations, for instance, Oliver 1979,13-23 (on West Africa). 12. See Hodder 1979,189-96, Reece 1979,211-217 (particularly 216-217). Also Jones and Walker 1983,189-93, who raise fundamental questions about the interrelationship between an "embedded" native economy and a Roman market system. 13. Very few coins have been found in surface sherding and excavation by the ULVP. Only two identifiable examples were found at Ghirza by Brogan (1976,123) and one in the wadi el-Amud (1964,52, a bronze of Galb a: ) . 14. Barker 1982,2-8; 1983,1-49. 15. See further 8: 3, below. For discussion of the functioning of embedded economies (based on social ties and obligations) see Polanyi et al 1957, passim; Hodder 1979; Haselgrove 1979. 16. Rebuffat 1977,407-13, lists the economic needs of fort and vicus. 17. The investment of capital in developing the land and in planting new olives is less tangible archaeologically but was not insignificant either. 18. Reynolds 1955,142 (Agerem); IRT 898,900 (Ghirza); the Antar inscrip- tion is to be published by Brogan. 19. Burns and Mattingly 1981,26-27, on the pair of obelisk tombs at el- Amud in the wadi N'f'd. 20. This was the practice in modern times also, Louis 1975,175; Brehony 1960,64. 21. The presence of some Roman finewares on a wide range of sites may indicate exchange rather than cash purchase, even though it would appear to confirm a rise in production levels above subsistence farming.

-448- 8: 2/8: 3 22. For further examples of models dealing with the special position of the gasr (or large farm) see Barker and Jones 1981,33-42. 23. Marichal 1979,448; Rebuffat and Marichal 1973,186. 24. See further below 8: 4. 25. Marichal 1979,448. Macargus is also recorded among the grain trans- porters (24 modii), though his main surplus was clearly in oil. 26.1 Selesua -1 Sbitualis -1 Siddipia s1 Aggatui -4 Isidarim a 12 modii - 105 litres. Another unit whose exact name is not known was equal to 3 Zsidarim or 9 modii. The base unit of this system is equivalent to 3 modii or 26.25 litres, the rest are multiplications of this. The same system also applied to olive oil, Marichal 1979,448. 27. Fentress 1979,175, has estimated that the combined spending power of the Third Legion and auxiliaries in Numidia and Tripolitania was HS 10,000,000 per year. A fair proportion of this will have been spent in the locality of the main garrison posts. The military market was, therefore, likely to have been a lucrative one and offered incentives for increased sedentary agriculture, Trousset 1981a; Rebuffat 1977,395-415; 1979,232-35; 1982a, 505-06. 28. See now Jones and Walker 1983,189-91, who argue that where vicus development was slow, it could be given official encouragement by the granting of tax exemptions and other privileges. The converse of this is that within its "dependency zone" a fort could exert considerable influence on local production patterns by restricting the choice of markets open to farmers. 29. See above the discussion in 7: 4. 30. Buck, Burns and Mattingly 1983,54. The processes are little under- stood as yet, but the work of the ULVP can suggest some of the possible alternatives. Prebble 1969, gives a graphic account of how sweeping socio-economic changes can be carried through by an elite following their subjugation in battle (in this case in the Scottish highlands in the eighteenth century). 31. Cf Garnsey 1978,235: "In rewarding the African elite with land and other material benefits, the Romans were following their traditional policy of building up a network of families, groups and communities with vested interests in the prolongation of Roman rule. What emerged in Africa, as elsewhere, was a highly stratified society, reflecting the unequal distribution of land". It also involved the coercions exploitation and extortion of a much larger peasant class, whose docility was a key factor in the prosperity, Picard 1975,98-111. 8: 3 The decline of Tripolitanian agriculture 1. As was evident from the discussion of a paper by D. Roques at the Cam- bridge Cyrenaican colloquium in April 1983. The consensus opposed his view that the Cyrenaican agricultural economy was still flourishing in the fifth century in spite of the raids of the Austuriani. 2. Duncan-Jones 1962,47-115; 1963,159-78. The recent excavations at Sidi Khrebish (Berenice) show that that town's economy declined after the third century A. D. see Lloyd 1977, passim. 3. Courtois et al 1952 passim. See also Courtois 1955,312-23; Whittaker 1978,360-61; Bourgeois 1980,213-228, on rural continuity into the Vandal period.

-447-<br />

8: 1/8: 2<br />

presses worked to full capacity for one month might produce c. 1500<br />

hectolitres <strong>of</strong> oil. For comparison, the total oil production <strong>of</strong> Libya<br />

in 1946 was only c. 7500 hectolitres.<br />

8: 2 The Army and the economy<br />

1. Fentress 1979,124-87.<br />

2. Fentress 1979,175-79.<br />

3. The Aures plain is also prime agricultural land rather than a marginal<br />

environment like that <strong>of</strong> Tripolitania or southern Numidia. See also note<br />

27 below.<br />

4. The evidence for irrigation systems is too extensive for all <strong>of</strong> it to<br />

have been military in origin and one may suspect a native origin for a<br />

good deal <strong>of</strong> it, contrary to the views expressed by Baradez 1949a; Birebent<br />

1962,487-507; Gsell et al 1902,1-143.<br />

5. See now Shaw's fundamental <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> the nundinae or rural markets in<br />

Africa, 1981a, 37-83.<br />

6. On the <strong>Roman</strong> economy, see Finley 1973 and Hopkins 1978. On the economy<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> Africa, Gsell HAAN I, 1-176 and Haywood 1938,3-119, are still<br />

fundamental for their discussion <strong>of</strong> the primary sources.<br />

7. O'Leary 1982, was a slightly misguided attempt to identify either a<br />

"primate" or "dendritic" market system in Tripolitania using an inadeq-<br />

uate data base. The methodologies, however, should prove <strong>of</strong> great<br />

value in future work.<br />

8. Manning 1975,112-16; Bowman and Thomas 1983,83-96; Rebuffat 1982a,<br />

505-06.<br />

9. Manning 1975,112-14; to some extent the speed <strong>of</strong> economic development<br />

may have conditioned the advance and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>frontier</strong>s.<br />

10. See above 7: 3.<br />

11. There are good parallels for this sort <strong>of</strong> economic development in modern<br />

colonial situations, for instance, Oliver 1979,13-23 (on West Africa).<br />

12. See Hodder 1979,189-96, Reece 1979,211-217 (particularly 216-217).<br />

Also Jones and Walker 1983,189-93, who raise fundamental questions<br />

about the interrelationship between an "embedded" native economy and<br />

a <strong>Roman</strong> market<br />

system.<br />

13. Very few coins have been found in surface sherding and excavation by<br />

the ULVP. Only two identifiable examples were found at Ghirza by<br />

Brogan (1976,123)<br />

and one in the wadi el-Amud (1964,52, a bronze <strong>of</strong><br />

Galb a: ) .<br />

14. Barker 1982,2-8; 1983,1-49.<br />

15. See further 8: 3, below. For discussion <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong> embedded<br />

economies (based on social ties and obligations) see Polanyi et al 1957,<br />

passim; Hodder 1979; Haselgrove 1979.<br />

16. Rebuffat 1977,407-13, lists the economic needs <strong>of</strong> fort and vicus.<br />

17. The investment <strong>of</strong> capital in developing the land and in planting new<br />

olives is less tangible archaeologically but was not insignificant either.<br />

18. Reynolds 1955,142 (Agerem); IRT 898,900 (Ghirza); the Antar inscrip-<br />

tion is to be published by Brogan.<br />

19. Burns and Mattingly 1981,26-27, on the pair <strong>of</strong> obelisk tombs at el-<br />

Amud in the wadi N'f'd.<br />

20. This was the practice in modern times also, Louis 1975,175; Brehony<br />

1960,64.<br />

21. The presence <strong>of</strong> some <strong>Roman</strong> finewares on a wide range <strong>of</strong> sites may<br />

indicate<br />

exchange rather than cash purchase, even though it would<br />

appear to confirm a rise in production levels above subsistence<br />

farming.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!