a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua
a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua a comparative study of a Roman frontier province. - Historia Antigua
-434- 7: 2 17. T know of no published plan and Trousset's account is rather short of detail. 18. If the outer wall is not the main defensive enceinte then clearly Si Aioun was not a fortlet at all, but a small outpost like Gasr Zerzi. 19. Goodchild 1976a, pl. 53. 20. See above, note 5. Also Reynolds and Simpson 1967,45-47. 21. Mattingly 1982,73-80. 22. Goodchild 1951b, 74-79 (with plan). 23. The excavations by an expedition from Cambridge University have never been fully published. See Reynolds and Brogan 1960,51-52; Reynolds and Simpson 1967,45-47. 24. Brogan 1980,51 and pers. obs. 25. The plan was made for the ULVP by myself and Mr. D. Buck. 26. Brogan 1980,51 and pers. comm. J. N. Dore, who notes that there were sherds of terra sigillata and early ARS forms (second century) in abundance but comparatively little late ARS and no TRS. The floreat of the site was undoubtedly early in date. 27. See, for instance Toussaint 1906,230-36. 28. Brogan 1964; 1971a; Di Vita 1964a; Jones and Barker 1980; Barker and Jones 1981; 1982; Jones et al 1983. 29. cf the contrasting views of Goodchild 1950a, 41-44 and di Vita 1964a, 71-73. 30. Many of the gsur in the Gebel Tarhuna were ditched and the vast proportion were civilian foundations, see Oates 1954,91-117. 31. Elaborate mausolea were built near Roman outposts as well, as at Si Aioun, Trousset 1974,118-20. 32. See Gauckler 1902,321-40; Toutain 1903a, 372-74; Leschi 1943,5-22; Goodchild 1949a, 32-34; Ward-Perkins and Goodchild 1949,28. 33. Smith 1971,299-318, argued for parallels with the milefortlets and milecastles of Hadrian's Wall which he suggested were designed for the outstationing of centuries. 34. It is highly unlikely that either the officer in command or the garrison size was the same at these two sites. 35. See above 6: 4. The theory was advanced with some reservations by Goodchild 1949a, 32-34; -1950a, 41-44 and Ward-Perkins and Goodchild 1949,26-29 and became widely accepted without the necessary qualifications. 36. Goodchild 1952b, 80, talked of a zone of limitanei settlement behind the limes' forts which was inaugurated by Severus Alexander, with the implication that most gsur were part of an official scheme for the defence of the region. 37. See App. 3, nos. 114-119. 38. See now Buck, Burns and Mattingly 1983,52-54. 39. cf Goodchild 1950a, 41 and the more cautious views of Buck, Burns and Mattingly 1983,52-54. Concerning the pyrgoi see above pp. 121-22. 40. Toutain 1903a, 325-30; Cagnat 1913,539-42. 41. The site-was visited by members of the ULVP in 1980 and planned by myself and J. R. Burns. 42. The only other new discovery of note was a piece of entablature (from a small mausoleum ) which I discovered in a heap of rubble in another part of the Italian fort. 43. For the identical masonry and treatment of the corners, see Goodchild 1976a, pl. 31; di Vita 1964a, pl. xxxv, b, c, d. 44. See App. 2, the Banat village and Burns and Mattingly 1981,27-29.
7: 2 -435- 45. The survey of the site was carried out by H. Coddington and I. Skirton under the direction- of J. R. Burnss. and myself. The final drawing for . publication was by myself. 46. J. N. Dore (pers. comm) notes 2 sherds of terra sigillata, examples of ARS forms 5; 23,27,27/31 (10 rims) which as a group hint at a late second-century. origin for the site. Later pottery included ARS forms 50,58,32/58,59,69 and TRS 2,3. 47. The site was surveyed in 1979 by G. D. B. Jones, myself and others for the ULVP. 48. For example, a fortified building of this type was excavated at Hr. Suffit (Tarhuna) by Bartoccini 1929,106-10. Although clearly defensive in nature one can be less certain of a military interpretation on the basis of the ashlar masonry. 49. Boinag is almost certainly the site known to Pliny as Boin (NH, V. 37) 50. Rebuffat 1970c, 181-87; 1970d, 17-18. 51. Brogan and Reynolds 1964,43-46; Rebuffat 1970b, 136-37; 1982a, plates; App. 3, nos. 48-49. 52. Rebuffat 1972a, 324-26; 1975c, 499; 1982c, 197-99, on sites in the wadi Neina and bei el-Kebir (for instance Shwerif and a "forteresse" at Oum el-Gueloub nearby). 53. The cistern at Zerzi was actually constructed by the Roman army and the same was no doubt true in other cases. These large cisterns were not simply to supply the small detachments with water but to encourage travellers and transhumers to use the routes under Roman supervision. 54. This fact is played down by Goodchild 1971,160. 55. Warnes was first visited and planned by de Mathuisieulx 1905,88-89, a fact unknown to Smith 1971,302-03, who also published a plan. Coodchild 1976a, pl. 19, is a superb air-photograph of the site which shows the gasr in its full context with ditch and low counterscarp wall. The site was visited and resurveyed for the ULVP in 1981 by myself, Dr. D. Welsby and P. Moffat. 56. IRT 881 (= App. 3, no. 32). The text is very worn and overlain by graffiti, but the visible letters suggest it belongs in the class identified as Latino-Punic by Levi della Vida 1963,65-94; 1965,59-62. 57. The plan reproduced by Gauckler and Cagnat is preferable to Trousset's simplified version. 58. The latest coin is of Eugenius A. D. 392-94. 59. The following list of towers is compiled from Trousset 1974. His site nos. 18,34,40,101,115 are possibilities at best for military sites. Nos. 54-57,74,107,111 are certainly in association with other military sites. But his site 108, which I visited in 1982, is not a tower at all, but a farm with an associated square mausoleum covered by a circular tumulus: 60. Including gates four towers are associated with the Tebaga clausura, one with Bir out All, one (or two) with Skiffa, one with Chenini; four with Hadd Hajar (including one discovered in 1981 by D. Buck). 61. See above 6: 3; Barth 1857,123; Coodchild 1954a, 54, and pers. obs. with ULVP. The tower stands in a dominant position c. 1 km north of the fort with extensive views of the approach corridors from the north and east. 62. Donau 1904a, 467-77, on the tower 250 m south of Benia Ceder; Donau 1909a, 36-37, Trousset 1974,78, on Mergueb ed Diab. See also note 64, below. 63. On the varied functions of towers, see Baatz 1970; Gichon 1974,513-30. 64. Rebuffat 1978,846, describes the legend which links Bezereos and Tamezrend. 65. Di Vita 1964a, 87-88; Rebuffat 1978,845-46. 66. Rebuffat 1978,845-46; 1982a, 483-85.
- Page 19 and 20: -383- 7 3: 1/3: 2 17. An example of
- Page 21 and 22: -385- 3: 2/3: 3 46. Frezouls 1957,6
- Page 23 and 24: -387- 3: 3 tribes which cumulativel
- Page 25 and 26: -389- 3: 3 75. There were at least
- Page 27 and 28: -391- 4: 1 21. Johnson 1969,1-3. 22
- Page 29 and 30: -393- 4: 2 13. Sallust, BJ, XCII, 1
- Page 31 and 32: -395- 4: 2 65. For Saniat Gebril, s
- Page 33 and 34: -397- 4: 3j4; 4 20. Camps 1960,279-
- Page 35 and 36: -399- 4: 5 12. See above note 7. Ma
- Page 37 and 38: I -401- CHAPTER 5 FRONTIER THEORY A
- Page 39 and 40: -403- 5: 1 36. A few examples from
- Page 41 and 42: -405- 5: 1 66. On Byzantine frontie
- Page 43 and 44: -407- 5: 2 15. Desanges 1957,5-43.
- Page 45 and 46: -409- 5: 2 intervention and when Ca
- Page 47 and 48: -411- 5: 3 12. The evidence has bee
- Page 49 and 50: -413- 5: 3 50. See note 49, above.
- Page 51 and 52: -415- 5: 4 43. Rebuffat 1981,213-22
- Page 53 and 54: -417- FOOTNOTES CHAPTER 6 TRIPODITA
- Page 55 and 56: -419- 6: 1 53. Romanelli 1939,110-1
- Page 57 and 58: -421- 6: 2 9. The case has been con
- Page 59 and 60: -423- 6: 2 /6: 3 presented each one
- Page 61 and 62: -425- 6: 3 Tillibari (Ramada); Then
- Page 63 and 64: -427- 6: 3 have been a nzanerus col
- Page 65 and 66: -429- 6: 4 9. Rebuffat 1977,402-14;
- Page 67 and 68: -431- 7: 1 26. See Jones et al 1983
- Page 69: -433- 7; 1/7; 2 81. Cagnat 1913,542
- Page 73 and 74: -437- 7; 3 2. See Pringle 1981,96 a
- Page 75 and 76: -438- 7: 3 28. Trousset 1978,167-79
- Page 77 and 78: -440- 7: 4 V1CI 1. The study of vic
- Page 79 and 80: -442- 7; 4 53. But one should note
- Page 81 and 82: -444- 8: 1 26. Dore 1983,54-57. Als
- Page 83 and 84: -446- 8: 1 64. As is the case with
- Page 85 and 86: -448- 8: 2/8: 3 22. For further exa
- Page 87 and 88: -450- 8: 3/8: 4 27. Contrary to the
- Page 89 and 90: -452- 8: 4 33. See the classic acco
- Page 91 and 92: 9: 1 -454- promptior. Severus was a
- Page 93 and 94: -456- 9: 1 82. Nimran himself canno
- Page 95 and 96: -458- 9: 1/9: 2 124. Brown 1972,294
- Page 97 and 98: Ii! 1 -460- 9: 2 43. Ammianus Marce
- Page 99 and 100: 9: 3 -462- 15. Jones 1971,293. 16.
- Page 101 and 102: -464- ITINERARIES :I THE COASTAL RO
- Page 103 and 104: -466- Table of recorded distances o
- Page 105 and 106: -468- III TACAPAE TO THE DJERID OAS
- Page 107 and 108: -470- VI GEBEL EL-ASKER ROUTE - Cap
- Page 109 and 110: -472- APPENDIX 2: Tribal centres in
- Page 111 and 112: -474- At the narrow northern end of
- Page 113 and 114: -476- II The Banat 'Village (Nf '39
- Page 115 and 116: -478- APPENDIX 3: MILITARY EPIGRAPH
- Page 117 and 118: -480- RAS EL AIN (Talalati, Tabalat
- Page 119 and 120: -482- 29. [In]comparabilis virtutis
7: 2<br />
-435-<br />
45. The survey <strong>of</strong> the site was carried out by H. Coddington and I. Skirton<br />
under the direction- <strong>of</strong> J. R. Burnss. and myself. The final drawing for<br />
.<br />
publication<br />
was by myself.<br />
46. J. N. Dore (pers. comm) notes 2 sherds <strong>of</strong> terra sigillata, examples <strong>of</strong><br />
ARS forms 5; 23,27,27/31 (10 rims) which as a group hint at a late<br />
second-century. origin for the site. Later pottery included ARS forms<br />
50,58,32/58,59,69 and TRS 2,3.<br />
47. The site was surveyed in 1979 by G. D. B. Jones, myself and others for<br />
the<br />
ULVP.<br />
48. For example, a fortified building <strong>of</strong> this type was excavated at Hr.<br />
Suffit (Tarhuna) by Bartoccini 1929,106-10. Although clearly defensive<br />
in nature one can be less certain <strong>of</strong> a military interpretation on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the ashlar masonry.<br />
49. Boinag is almost certainly the site known to Pliny as Boin (NH, V. 37)<br />
50. Rebuffat 1970c, 181-87; 1970d, 17-18.<br />
51. Brogan and Reynolds 1964,43-46; Rebuffat 1970b, 136-37; 1982a,<br />
plates; App. 3, nos. 48-49.<br />
52. Rebuffat 1972a, 324-26; 1975c, 499; 1982c, 197-99, on sites in the<br />
wadi Neina and bei el-Kebir (for instance Shwerif and a<br />
"forteresse" at Oum el-Gueloub nearby).<br />
53. The cistern at Zerzi was actually constructed by the <strong>Roman</strong> army and<br />
the same was no doubt true in other cases. These large cisterns were<br />
not simply to supply the small detachments with water but to encourage<br />
travellers and transhumers to use the routes under <strong>Roman</strong> supervision.<br />
54. This fact is played down by Goodchild 1971,160.<br />
55. Warnes was first visited and planned by de Mathuisieulx 1905,88-89,<br />
a fact unknown to Smith 1971,302-03, who also published a plan.<br />
Coodchild 1976a, pl. 19, is a superb air-photograph <strong>of</strong> the site which<br />
shows the gasr in its full context with ditch and low counterscarp<br />
wall. The site was visited and resurveyed for the ULVP in 1981 by<br />
myself, Dr. D. Welsby and P. M<strong>of</strong>fat.<br />
56. IRT 881 (= App. 3, no. 32). The text is very worn and overlain by<br />
graffiti, but the visible letters suggest it belongs in the class<br />
identified as Latino-Punic by Levi della Vida 1963,65-94; 1965,59-62.<br />
57. The plan reproduced by Gauckler and Cagnat is preferable to Trousset's<br />
simplified<br />
version.<br />
58. The latest coin is <strong>of</strong> Eugenius A. D. 392-94.<br />
59. The following list <strong>of</strong> towers is compiled from Trousset 1974. His<br />
site nos. 18,34,40,101,115 are possibilities at best for military<br />
sites. Nos. 54-57,74,107,111 are certainly in association with<br />
other military sites. But his site 108, which I visited in 1982, is<br />
not a tower at all, but a farm with an associated square mausoleum<br />
covered by a circular tumulus:<br />
60. Including gates four towers are associated with the Tebaga clausura,<br />
one with Bir out All, one (or two) with Skiffa, one with Chenini;<br />
four with Hadd Hajar (including one discovered in 1981 by D. Buck).<br />
61. See above 6: 3; Barth 1857,123; Coodchild 1954a, 54, and pers.<br />
obs. with ULVP. The tower stands in a dominant position c. 1 km<br />
north <strong>of</strong> the fort with extensive views <strong>of</strong> the approach corridors<br />
from the north and east.<br />
62. Donau 1904a, 467-77, on the tower 250 m south <strong>of</strong> Benia Ceder; Donau 1909a,<br />
36-37, Trousset 1974,78, on Mergueb ed Diab. See also note 64,<br />
below.<br />
63. On the varied functions <strong>of</strong> towers, see Baatz 1970; Gichon 1974,513-30.<br />
64. Rebuffat 1978,846, describes the legend which links Bezereos<br />
and Tamezrend.<br />
65. Di Vita 1964a, 87-88; Rebuffat 1978,845-46.<br />
66. Rebuffat 1978,845-46; 1982a, 483-85.